Michael/ Lauren civil trial update February 9

It’s pretty unbelievable isn’t it? Maybe she was watching a movie in her head instead of the video?

Mr Bilinkas does not ask “When?” After some silence, he repeats the question and Judge T tells him to move on.

I suspect that’s a print out of the actual text in his hand when he asks the question.

17 Likes

I wonder if/when MBs side gets records related to professional experts who have evaluated her mental and emotional health Pre and post shooting, if any of the records will speak to an actual psychological disorder with respect to lying.

Such disorders exist. Maybe that’s a partial explanation.

4 Likes

This was one of the emotional moments in the trial.

4 Likes

What’s the lie?

The quotes LL provides there are on the video verbatim.

2 Likes

Really? No. Not really. Where do you hear the “when” question at that point?

9 Likes

I just want to point out that public shunning is a very effective tactic……but it requires everyone’s participation to work.

21 Likes

Yes. It’s kind of hard to watch, honestly. The contrast between the “victim” and the defendant is just…well, I don’t have good words.

20 Likes

The “when” and her response, verbatim, are earlier in the exchange.

The order may well be different from what is suggested in her post. But it’s all there, verbatim.

1 Like

Yes, but some of this is because getting a response lights up those dopamine centers like a Christmas tree.

I know it does mine!

6 Likes

I will try harder.
I will try harder.
I will try harder.
I will try harder.
I will try harder.
I will try harder.
I will try harder.

:wink:

5 Likes

So it is not verbatim!

You can’t combine two different conversations and then say it is verbatim.

What happened here was Mr. B tried to repeat her comment about finishing the bastard. And then they went on to go over one of her social medial posts, the one where she bragged about being Miss Bad A$$ and blocking him from him truck, which on the stand she claimed did not happen.

Telling the truth is so hard for some, clearly.

28 Likes

Interesting but not surprising.

1 Like

One exchange was asking whether she wanted to scare him, the other as to whether she wanted him “finished”. Yes, different exchanges on the same topic. The “when” would apply to both.

Not surprising that you would brand it a lie, @trubandloki

All the quotes are there verbatim.

Again, you can not combine two conversations and say it is verbatim.
That is not what that word means.

Yes, it is a lie to say something is verbatim when it is not.

26 Likes

I will admit, I get a dopamine rush everytime I punch a straw man.

But it’s time to stop. I’ll just let the stupid straw men hang out over in left field.

15 Likes

No, I fail to see the hypocrisy because there is absolutely none.

When LK decided to “FINISH THE BASTARD”, as well as publish her manifesto online, and act like “Miss Badass”, her words not mine, she intended to provoke trouble.

She teased RC about her missing gun on social media, and gained access to an office and things she had no lawful right to.

What does this equal @CurrentlyHorseless???

No hypocrisy and not one ounce of sympathy for LK.

LO had no dog in the fight when this incident took place.

35 Likes

And by extension she would have free access to the office/safe (where the gun was kept) the night before the shooting happened. Barisone would think she was gone and drop his guard or just as likely he might have gone to a hotel himself. But where he and the others would not be, is in the club room sleeping in front of those office doors.

7 Likes

@CurrentlyHorseless, If you use the theory on that verbatim means what most of the rest of the world uses, that previous conversation (literally 45 minutes before the conversation being discussed, so I doubt anyone thinks the question applies to both) was not verbatim either, since verbatim means exactly the same words and all.

The exchange was at 3:36 in that video

Mr B: was it your intention to scare Michael Barrisone?

LK: um…maybe at that point.

Mr B: what point was that?

LK: I don’t recall. After being bullied and tortured for weeks and days.

@CurrentlyHorseless, it is ok for even you to admit that sometimes Lauren Kanarek lies. Even she admits she lies on social media.

14 Likes

That is where the ignore feature comes in.

8 Likes

So - back to discussing the case.

I had this thought about discovery and subpoenas.

I know that during discovery, lawyers typically have to subpoena social media platforms of one variety or another to get ALL content that was posted by a user with a specific IP address, or content that is tied to a specific email account. - if the email or IP address is linked to a party involved in the lawsuit

I wonder if MB and CD have recently sent subpoenas to our very own COTH to see if there are additional, previously unidentified, accounts on this platform that are linked to LK. After all… didn’t she pop onto this thread just a little while ago with yet another new username? My guess is that they will have to formally document all the posts she made with that account, and include them in the file.

I also wonder if they have sent subpoenas to YouTube to see if that weird Bob Abooey account actually does tie to an email or IP address linked to LK?

It’s my understanding tech platforms can be slow to respond to subpoenas… but maybe, given the Kanareks’ decision to use delay tactics since last summer right up until present, MAYBE that will mean that MB and CD have all the extra time work in their favor, and they get even MORE crazy social media evidence back from a few key platforms regarding stuff LK has said online within the last 9 months. Then they can question her on all of this stuff as well during her deposition.

I will seriously laugh if that ridiculous Bob Abooey YouTube account is formally tied to her in court documents. That was SUCH a stupid move… to rant online in comments on L&C videos during and after the actual criminal trial.

22 Likes