Michael/ Lauren civil trial update February 9

[Knights_Mom]

@MHM

Or maybe Rosie was staying with LK’s parents or sisters, if she wasn’t banned from the family homes.

As in the parents would allow Kujo the bitey dog but not their daughter?

That would be something.

[MHM]

You never know.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@trubandloki

@CurrentlyHorseless

@trubandloki

@CurrentlyHorseless

@trubandloki

Thank you for posting this screen shot of @Inigo-montoya’s (Jonathan Kanarek) post.

The last paragraph makes me scratch my head.

It seems to me if the prosecution at the criminal trial had any evidence of someone else doing that list of things to Michael before the shooting that they would have brought that up for the jury. So weird that Jonathan Kanarek would say something like that when it was not true… I guess he was caught in yet one more lie. Just like Jonathan Kanarek saying he wanted to cooperate with discovery in the civil trial.

Are you serious?

IM is saying that MHG was the one harassing and tormenting MB. Duh.

Why on earth would the prosecution bring that up in the criminal trial?

???

Even the prosecutions expert witness testified that Michael wasn’t delusional because Lauren Kanarek was tormenting him. But he never mentioned that MHG was also. Seems so weird that someone trying to make Lauren look sweet and a victim would not have mentioned MHG’s part if they had a part, I mean, this was the prosecution’s witness.

Michael’s defense was about His state of mind. If MHG was part of that, why would Schelly let Lauren Kanarek look so bad on the stand?

I guess in the movie in your head, the prosecution just ignores some great bit that makes their victim look less like the cause of the whole problem.

The criminal trial was not about who or what caused MBs mental breakdown.

It was about whether MB shot LK (yes) and whether he was insane at the time he shot her (also yes).

It was irrelevant to the prosecution as to whether LK or MHG or both or neither were “tormenting” him.

Not really, but I can see how the movie in your head can be confused.

If the prosecution could make their victim look more sympathetic they would have pounced on it.

Anyway, you were not there, you have no idea if MHG did anything at all. Does your posting rule not apply to you here?

We all know that Jonathan Kanarek (@Inigo-montoya) has been proven to not be near as reliable as you would like him to be.

Edit to add bolding since it appears we need to bold bits of our posts now.

Re bolded: How does asserting MHG added greatly to the pressure on MB make LK appear more sympathetic? It doesn’t.

The prosecutions position was that it’s a crime to attempt to murder a person, regardless of whether the person is “sympathetic” or “unsympathetic”.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@trubandloki

just read your post! I inferred nothing. I read your words.

So post my words, again.
If you find the words “I read the police report”, or similar, put them in bold.

[Joanne]

If one says something is not in a certain police report, do you [g} get the impression that the person read it and knows what is and is not in the report?

[MHM]

People, people. Please.

[Joanne]

The post by Currently Horseless is located:

Thread: MB Civil Suit rulings 11/15/2022

Post #: 3308 +/- a couple of posts.

[BigMama1]

@CurrentlyHorseless

So post my words, again.
If you find the words “I read the police report”, or similar, put them in bold.

Let’s recap: you stated that to your knowledge something was not in the police report. Unless you had seen that report, what knowledge could you possibly have about it?

You didn’t say it wasn’t mentioned in court, or that you had not seen any reference to it in court filings. You said it wasn’t in the report. We all understand that statement was just puffery, a fabrication perhaps intended to make yourself look or feel important or knowledgable. We also get that statement clearly implied you had read the report. Own your own words.

[Knights_Mom]

This didn’t age well

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@BigMama1

@CurrentlyHorseless

So post my words, again.
If you find the words “I read the police report”, or similar, put them in bold.

Let’s recap: you stated that to your knowledge something was not in the police report. Unless you had seen that report, what knowledge could you possibly have about it?

You didn’t say it wasn’t mentioned in court, or that you had not seen any reference to it in court filings. You said it wasn’t in the report. We all understand that statement was just puffery, a fabrication perhaps intended to make yourself look or feel important or knowledgable. We also get that statement clearly implied you had read the report. Own your own words.

I said it was based on statements made in court testimony about the incident that police report was about. In particular, the testimony of RC.

I’ve explained it before. Don’t blame me if you missed it.

[Joanne]

[Knights_Mom]

[3PonyFarm]

That poor hamster.

[Knights_Mom]

@3PonyFarm

That poor hamster.

No one likes hamster on hamster crime.

[3PonyFarm]

It is a problem in this country.

[BigMama1]

Nice try, but no. Isn’t it great that the screenshots can refresh your memory? They are so handy.

[Ambitious_Kate]

@CurrentlyHorseless

Re bolded: How does asserting MHG added greatly to the pressure on MB make LK appear more sympathetic? It doesn’t.

The prosecutions position was that it’s a crime to attempt to murder a person, regardless of whether the person is “sympathetic” or “unsympathetic”.

Honey, you’re uber multi quoting again. You had gotten so good at not doing that, you’re slipping. Just thought I’d let you know.

[McGurk]

@Sdel

I imagine it is actually a fishing game to hunt down potential social media connections that can be stalked and attacked in real life…play dumb and see who comes up with the real story in order to identify possible links.

This requires more attention and emphasis.

[trubandloki]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@trubandloki

just read your post! I inferred nothing. I read your words.

So post my words, again.
If you find the words “I read the police report”, or similar, put them in bold.

Oh @CurrentlyHorseless, I will just let all your words speak for themselves.
And thankfully they are all screen shots so you can not claim they are edited or just portions are posted, which seems to be your lasted “twister game” attempt.

Your original post (and I know someone else so nicely posted it just last evening for you, but I promised I would post it for you so here it is).

And here are your responses, which as you can see, change over time.

[eggbutt]

Thank you @trubandloki and others who recalled and posted screenshots and links.