There have been over 3,000 posts since I last dropped by, so I’ll admit I’ve skimmed a bit to try to catch up, but I have a question for the legal professionals:
If a civil case were brought against a pirate for murder most foul by a consistently humorless seafarer,
And if that curiously hawkish seafarer had been made to walk the plank by the pirate’s mate,
And if that mate were never provided with W2s, but were instead paid in kind through the provision of bed, board, brandy, and of course booty,
And if the churlishly heedless seafarer inspired this punishment by interrupting every one of Fezzik’s charming rhyming couplets and steering the ship toward the Cliffs of Insanity,
And if, as a result of walking the plank, the caustically hyperbolic seafarer were only mostly dead,
And if this covertly heartless seafarer’s only purpose for living were ‘to blave’,
And if Jim E. Stark, who failed to disclose whether he was licensed as an EMT or as a superhero, assisted in getting the slightly alive but clearly hopeless seafarer to Miracle Max,
But inconsistencies existed in transcripts made of his illegal and mysteriously missing recordings,
And nobody served proper 3-day emergency eviction notices to any hamsters before spinning their wheels, Then, my dear, esteemed legal professionals, regarding the assignment of comparative neglegence: does it matter if the movie in my head resembles Better Call Saul more than My Cousin Vinny? And can a person be held legally responsible for understanding the word ‘verbatim’ or appropriate use of quotation marks?
Asking for a friend.
Oh and because I’ve noticed that plain language isn’t always sufficient for communicating complex legal concepts on this forum, feel free to illustrate your answers with amazing drawings, interpretive ninja dances, or if you’re elderly enough to have been on the internet in the pre-Mean Girls era, a hamster dance.
I guess you also think that nurses and radiology technicians and phlebotomists and dental hygienists and optometrists and the like cannot refer to themselves as “health care professionals.”
Once again you display your propensity for faulty logic.
Platonically of course. I don’t want this getting weird or anything LOL
There’s always a chance of a surprise verdict but I think the hamsters agree this case may be beyond “if the hamster wheel don’t fit, you must acquit”.
And yes I know these are guinea pigs. I blame Google.