It was established in the criminal court by the jury that Barisone did not shoot at the boyfriend. Why would GAS say that Barisone shot at the boyfriend ?
It’s BS quite frankly. If they expected SGF to know that Lauren was in danger and somehow it was on them to remove Barisone from the situation, then it was also on Lauren to GTFO…since the situation was so dangerous and the signs were so clear.
I also think that this particular attorney (GAS) and legal team have been reading too much COTH or think it has a larger impact than it does. So many people on the horse industry know F all when it comes to forums and/or COTH. I also have no idea how it was on them to know about LK’s SS matters.
Plus, if I’m a landlord and police get continously called to one of my properties because the tenn
ant(s) on that property are causing trouble, what is my actual responsibility there, legally? Does anyone know. Is there an actual law or case they could site there. If that’s the case, man, landlords have a lot to answer for. So many crimes have been commited by various tenants everyone on rented properties across the US. Also, what action did they expect SGF to take? Give MB an instant (lol) eviction and say, “Oh here, we removed our main tenant, who is also apart of this LLC (IIRC) from the property and you can just stay Lauren, it’s all yours. We just know he’s going to shoot you and/or attack you.”
Right.
I guess it’s worth a try though? Just throw the kitchen sink at it and all that :shrug:
Speaking (writing) of Krol hearings, I seem to remember some discussion here around the time of MB’s first hearing about legislation in NJ concerning crime victims’ rights to be kept informed on their case, to make clear that a crime victim does not have a right to attend mental health hearings after an NGRI verdict. Am I remembering correctly, and did anything ever come of that legislation?
(Of course, as has been pointed out here, NGRI means there was no crime, so while there may be a gunshot victim, there is not a “crime victim” once that is the verdict so logically one would think “victims’ rights” legislation would no longer apply. But apparently the law in NJ is not that logical.)
I am going to state right here and now, very clearly, that I have NEVER once done anyone’s bidding on COTH, other than my own. I have no relation to Michael Barisone, do not know him, and am NOT dressage aficionado.
I probably would have continue to follow along and read, had it not been for the fact Lauren Kanarek threatened me and attempted to dox me repeatedly.
I will never back down from a bully, which is exactly what Lauren Kanarek and her ilk are. @Inigo-montoya went as far as to comment that he thought I was stupid, but hey, at least I know when to keep my mouth shut, unlike the educated attorney he likes to present himself as!
If Jonathan and Kirby Kanarek were treated so damn badly over here, why were they here repeatedly to begin with?
They should have wised up long before they did, and realized most of COTH is a group that has been around the block more than once, and we saw through LK’s bogus stories very quickly.
I mean, the sad part is that sometimes “BS” does stick. It’s frustrating and I’ve seen/heard of some wild things that have happened…the cases themselves and the verdicts.
If the Kanarek’s can justify to the court changing the attorney yet again, due to incompetence or negligence in the filings, they will achieve yet another round of delays.
I’m not sure that will work. I think it is highly likely that the Kanarek’s are the ones writing the filings or at least the history/background portions…to many similarities and reaching to address CotH discussions for it to have been GAS. Unless we believe that their attorney has been reading the last few threads.
Lordy, what a weird, messy, sloppy filing. I’m always amazed when they cannot even get a simple term consistent throughout the document (e.g., Plaintiff/plaintiff).
They go on and on about what the criminal case settled wrt MB, but ignore what it settled wrt RG (aka MG ).
And can anyone tell me what about producing videos/texts that are on your phone and transcripts that you made and already produced for other parties would qualify as an ‘incredible burden and oppressive expense’?
Incredible burden? Oppressive expense? That level of hyperbole rises to histrionics.
Given BN’s and GAS’s previous involvement, I’m not surprised that Amateur Hour continues regarding the written product and reasoning therein.
Any chance that when BN finally grokked that this was a dog with fleas he just needed someone to take the frontman position so it wouldn’t reflect directly back on his practice and GAS owed him a favour?
This is the best description ever of this whole situation. JK and KK cannot escape being identified as the very active players they were.
I still believe asking for all the emails and texts between RG/JK are very relevant as far as what was sent to him immediately after the fact. We all can, or should, recognize the Kanareks are going to hide everything they possibly can. They continue to prove there sure was a lot of fire underneath all that smoke!
As far as the elderly Kanareks on this forum - didn’t they voluntarily come to this forum and engage others including making derogatory personal remarks against some? Didn’t they promote all sorts of BS?
Personally I haven’t spoken with anyone related directly with the situation in YEARS. Perhaps Michael has developed super telepathy while he’s been incarcerated and he is sending the mob mental instructions. Anyone on this forum who knows me knows I am no one’s messenger and have no issue speaking my mind!