I have probably created a macronutrient problem for my horse, somewhat deliberately. An increase in his pergolide dose put him off his grain over the summer, and I switched him from 2lb/day of TC Lite to 2lb/day of TC Senior to get the medicine to go down. This is about 1/3 of the recommended serving by weight- he meets his calorie needs with forage alone- and my intention was that if I couldn’t get him back to eating the Lite, I would monitor his condition by bloodwork and supplement as required. And lo, now that he knows the joy of a really delicious food, he is not interested in eating celery again, because he is not stupid.
As I’m considering his condition, his bloodwork to date, and the need to further monitor and adjust, I’m wondering if a FeedXL subscription might be a good tool- or if I don’t have complete enough data to allow it to work for me. Here are the constraints I’m working in:
- I board. I am not involved in pasture management, and I’m not readily able to get the grass tested.
- Our hay vendor is consistent but the suppliers who sell to them are not, so a hay analysis would not be of benefit.
- The major problem I need to solve for is that my horse’s summer condition is good, but in winter I observe changes that I attribute to his nutrition. (I suspect that I know where he’s deficient based on his physical condition and what’s dead in his field- omega 3’s, magnesium- and both of these are a bit hard to prove by bloodwork.)
So: if I went with a FeedXL premium plan, would I be getting enough data to help me address his nutritional needs even with my constraints? From the site, it looks like I’ll be able to access average forage analyses for my area. Do these averages include seasonal variations? (The best pasture in the world won’t help if the grass is dead.) If you’re a FeedXL client already, would you suggest using this tool in addition to regular bloodwork, or have you found that it has obviated bloodwork and other monitoring?