[QUOTE=Plumcreek;8190055]
Good post Crone and pAin’t. I have no admiration for either woman, just was amazed at LP’s facial skin, considering my ball cap years did nothing to save my own.
On LP, I have a theory: In Western World, it is possible to be a ‘big friggin deal’ trainer with no talent, as jumping over fences or training for piaffe is not required, and gimmicks, spurs and leverage bits abound. I have seen many women and men in Western World get rough with horses when their talent for getting a horse to understand or advance in skills reaches it’s very short end. LP seems to be one of those.[/QUOTE]
My theory is a bit different.
Some people are just naturally good at getting what they want without fireworks, are eternally patient and adaptable to each situation and subject, be it horse or human.
Other people, not so much and that seems to be many to most, in any discipline or whatever else we do in life that requires that talent.
One other facet of the true talented, they tend not to be showy, they make it look so easy, no fireworks, no entertainment, like watching paint dry, until you realize you have the whole painting developing right in front of you.
Does help if the mere basics are there, that anyone can and when it comes to horses, honestly, should take the time to learn.
The Parelli bunch didn’t and when they realized that, decades down the road, well, we can see the results in what they invented as “horsemanship”, that is, because of the lack of knowledge and attention to mere basics, very rough around the edges.
If someone is where there are more western trainers, they may feel there are more of those not up to par than other types of trainers.
The same if someone is where there are more English riding schools and trainers, because there are more of those around than others.