New decision in Holstein

[QUOTE=Go Fish;8111821]
Thank you for reiterating this.

I scratch my head a lot with these type of threads. TBs are very good at what they are bred to do…race. I’m not sure why we can’t celebrate that fact instead of constantly having silly arguments about which type of horse is at the top of the “sporthorse” pile. It would appear that the fact that most sporthorse breeders no longer want a TB in their breeding program is a bitter pill to swallow for some people. Get over it - it’s not going to be changing anytime soon.[/QUOTE]

the problem … generally WB breeders love TBs … in the 2d or 3d generation of the paper.
But to stand there, one has to use them before …

so to say ‘let the neighbor do it’ (using the TB to cover the mare) is intellectual dishonesty because that is reaping what you didn’t sow …

[QUOTE=ahf;8123982]
I am not a TB hater. I have an in-foal TB broodmare grazing outside my office window as I type this. I bred her to produce a show hunter or eventer. If I was looking to produce a showjumper i would not have used her for that, nor would I have used a Tb stallion. Here’s why:

A while back, I took the 2009 Hannoveraner Jahrbuch Hengste, and analyzed the jumping breed values for all TB and half-TB stallions in the book. The results were actually worse than i had thought they would be. Of the 19 stallions, only two had a positive index (greater than the mean of 100), and neither of those two a value high enough for me to use to breed a showjumper.

2009 Jahrbuch Henste Springen

Amerigo Vespucci xx 75
Amoroso (Augustinus xx) 102
Calderon (Cardinal xx) 92
Colway Bold xx 95
Heraldik xx 118
Lancier (Lauries Crusador xx) 69
Lauries Crusador xx 69
Laurentio (Lauries Crusador xx) 81
Lemon Park (Lemon xx) 87
Likoto xx 67
Londonderry (Lauries Crusador xx) 67
Longchamp (Lauries Crusador xx) 58
Markus Deak xx 77
Mytens xx 108
Noble Roi xx 94
Prince Thatch xx 67
Sunlight xx 85
Waldstar xx 86
Wilawander xx 67

Average 82.31579[/QUOTE]

who said stats don’t lie ?

you are wrong on some points :

first : after disappearing, the breed indices of a stallion decrease
second : you mix stallions being dressage stallions and known to be brakes for SJ with SJ (or EV) stallions
third : HAN isn’t a SJ stud-book anymore

I finally arrived at the end of this discussion …

My first contribution was msg #1073 (something like that).

I arrived here (even if I knew about this forum) doing a research which let me to a msg on page 10 and I thought to myself that this could be interesting. So I subscribed to the forum.

And I was right that the discussion was / is interesting … half of the time (and I’m generous by saying half of the time).
Most msg were off topic, petty jelousy, diffamation, personal agression, obtuseness, megalomania and professional turgidity … and even outright lies (ignorance or volitional ?).

And I arrived here thinking that perhaps the American forae would be different tahn the German and French ones. And again it seems that I was right if this discussion is an example : it’s even worse !
I can take off topic any day, if the contributors are aware of this fact and limit themselves. Not here though !
Some are so involved that they don’t realise the agressivity of their words and the incongruness of their contributions.

What made the whole discussion hardly bearable is that the original poster never was in a position to manage this thread, being constantly on the defense.

And even the moderators were mediocre because in banning one without the otherS (it takes two to fight !), they left their neutral position behind and took sides … inacceptable.


On the content there are many things to say. Instead of discussing the pro and contra of the decision of the HV board to allow TBs licensed by other SB the discussion turned to ‘are TBs (still) necessary’ with a side aspect of TBs in high level sport and a component of ‘TBs vs WBs’.
The first one is old and is not in the hands of the board, because evidently, it’s the breeder who makes the decision to use, or not, a TB stallion in a WB breed.
The second one isn’t new …
and the third is not ‘cool’ either

Other discussions, related, could have been interesting :
change / evolution in the sport : width, heights and technicity of the course
what can a TB stallion bring to the WBs on an individual and breed level

Sorry to say so here, but it was not a great experience !

Yup, we need to have the skin of a rhino to contribute to the forums.

I have thoroughly enjoyed your contributions to this discussion, OBdB. As you might have picked up from my posts I am definitely in favor of hot blood crosses.

Since I come from the Arabian perspective I have little knowledge of how the individual TB’s pedigrees will affect the Holsteiners, but I can tell that continued infusions of hot blood is needed/or will be needed in the future.

After studying the Holstein mare line book I sometimes think that the Holsteiner should be called the Ethelbert breed like the Morgan breed is named after Justin Morgan (a half TB sire of looong ago!) Of course the Holstein breeders saw the need to continued TB outcrosses to turn a light harness horse into a very good riding horse. There is a LOT of TB blood in the modern Holsteiner.

And I still think it is a great pity that the Ethelbert sire line was allowed to die out. Heidelberg, in particular, sired some really nice, refined mares, even before the TB blood was reintroduced.

I will be rereading your posts. They are a valuable addition to this discussion. Thank you very much for taking the time to write them.

I personally hope that you return to this board in the future. Your posts have been extremely interesting because you have such a depth of knowledge of both Holstein and France which can inform any discussion and perhaps balance some of the discussions here.

You’d be an invaluable addition to this forum.

Viney,

The introduction of short format was not due to WB influence, rather the lack of ability to produce enough 3* events for all countries. The land requirements were challenging for some, and availability of events were making it difficult for a lot of countries to qualify. Stating this as a WB conspiracy is not accurate or helpful.

Tim

Welcome OBdB, I am also looking forward to read more from you as the Holsteiner and the SF horse are my favorite Studbooks.

Dr. Nissen had recently a presentation about inbreeding during the WBFSH Assembly. It is unbelieveble how Achill got integrated in the Holsteiner horse. Libero H is the perfect exaple of having 27 times of inbreeding on Achill.

And the genetic contribution of Cor de la Bryère is 11.55 % and from Ladykiller xx 8.61 % to the Holsteiner horse. What I don’t understand is that Almé only has a contribution of 2.03 % I would have thought he would be higher aswell.

Can you give me cites on your position? If WB influence was not at work, why did the FEI kill long format for qualification? There could easily have been a compromise that allowed horses to qualify for the Games either through long format or short format CCIs. No such compromise was allowed. Lack of qualification through long format is what put the final nail in the coffin.

[QUOTE=RyTimMick;8393978]
Viney,

The introduction of short format was not due to WB influence, rather the lack of ability to produce enough 3* events for all countries. The land requirements were challenging for some, and availability of events were making it difficult for a lot of countries to qualify. Stating this as a WB conspiracy is not accurate or helpful.

Tim[/QUOTE]

Can you give me cites on your position? If WB influence was not at work, why did the FEI kill long format for qualification? There could easily have been a compromise that allowed horses to qualify for the Games either through long format or short format CCIs. No such compromise was allowed. Lack of qualification through long format is what put the final nail in the coffin.

It seemed at the time almost comparable to the FEI saying to SJers that competitions couldn’t be held in venues that seated less than 60,000 spectators.

How do you explain the maintenance of the dressage coefficient?

[QUOTE=Bachus;8394038]
Welcome OBdB, I am also looking forward to read more from you as the Holsteiner and the SF horse are my favorite Studbooks.

Dr. Nissen had recently a presentation about inbreeding during the WBFSH Assembly. It is unbelieveble how Achill got integrated in the Holsteiner horse. Libero H is the perfect exaple of having 27 times of inbreeding on Achill.

And the genetic contribution of Cor de la Bryère is 11.55 % and from Ladykiller xx 8.61 % to the Holsteiner horse. What I don’t understand is that Almé only has a contribution of 2.03 % I would have thought he would be higher aswell.[/QUOTE]

What follows is part opinion, part observation and part speculation, so it has to be taken with a grain of salt …

the first difference between these 2 (Corde and Ladykiller on one side - Almé on the other) is that C and L were light horses licensed with the goal to improve the model and the technic. Whereas Almé was not licensed (?) only some of his sons : Athlet a Hanovrian, Ahorn a Hanovrian with an excellent HOL paper and Aloubé, rather onscur but with at least one excellent stallion son (Alcatraz).
Almé was not a light stallion and his best products come from blood mares. The same has to be said about his 3 sons in HOL.

The second difference is that both C and L were stallions of the Verband whereas the A were privately owned, and Aloubé was a loan (I think) without much influence.

Subsequently the A-line never had the favor of the HOL direction which at that time was an important handicap. I also think that the Q-line by Quidam suffered from this stand of the direction, just like the Qs of Quick Star (to a lesser degree but non the less).
For the 2 Qs, it has to be said that they were not the easiest to crossbreed so there had to be an experimentation as to what type of mare suits them.

It was always my opinion that the HV didn’t choose the right stallions when licensing Selle Français stallions. Quick Star and Quidam were choosen because of their career, nothing to say about that.
But, in my opinion, in a SB as consolidated as the HOL, you have to keep a constant flow when using outcross stallions to anchor the qualities which you were looking for in the first place. And with the 2 Qs, they choose 2 stallions with somewhat the same defaults.

[QUOTE=vineyridge;8393838]
I personally hope that you return to this board in the future. Your posts have been extremely interesting because you have such a depth of knowledge of both Holstein and France which can inform any discussion and perhaps balance some of the discussions here.

You’d be an invaluable addition to this forum.[/QUOTE]

Thank you very much, I’m flattered … but I am convinced that other have more in depth knowledge of the HOL than me …

My strength could be the knowledge of both, the HOL and the SF stud-books.

We will see what my opinions will do here … :lol::smiley:

I started the topic.
So could you tell me a bit more about the following please:
What made the whole discussion hardly bearable is that the original poster never was in a position to manage this thread, being constantly on the defense.

[QUOTE=OBdB;8393323]
I finally arrived at the end of this discussion …

My first contribution was msg #1073 (something like that).

I arrived here (even if I knew about this forum) doing a research which let me to a msg on page 10 and I thought to myself that this could be interesting. So I subscribed to the forum.

And I was right that the discussion was / is interesting … half of the time (and I’m generous by saying half of the time).
Most msg were off topic, petty jelousy, diffamation, personal agression, obtuseness, megalomania and professional turgidity … and even outright lies (ignorance or volitional ?).

And I arrived here thinking that perhaps the American forae would be different tahn the German and French ones. And again it seems that I was right if this discussion is an example : it’s even worse !
I can take off topic any day, if the contributors are aware of this fact and limit themselves. Not here though !
Some are so involved that they don’t realise the agressivity of their words and the incongruness of their contributions.

What made the whole discussion hardly bearable is that the original poster never was in a position to manage this thread, being constantly on the defense.

And even the moderators were mediocre because in banning one without the otherS, the left there neutral position behind took sides … inacceptable.


On the content there are many things to say. Instead of discussing the pro and contra of the decision of the HV board to allow TBs licensed by other SB the discussion turned to ‘are TBs (still) necessary’ with a side aspect of TBs in high level sport and a component of ‘TBs vs WBs’.
The first one is old and is not in the hands of the board, because evidently, it’s the breeder who makes the decision to use, or not, a TB stallion in a WB breed.
The second one isn’t new either …
and the third is not ‘cool’ either

Other discussions, related, could have been interesting :
change / evolution in the sport : width, heights and technicity of the course
what can a TB stallion bring to the WBs on an individual and breed level

Sorry to say so here, but it was not a great experience ![/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=OBdB;8390773]
Just a few basic informations … a bit like an introduction :

I have actually 5 mares, 3 old (20 / 19 / 17) and 2 young (4 / 5).

The old mares a based purely on HOL breeding :
20Y old mare and 19Y old mare : Sir Shostakovich xx - Farnese - Fax I - Marabu II
17Y old mare : Parco xx - Farnese - Fax I - Marabu II

The young mares belong to the French (SF) registry :
4Y old : Quality Touch - Sir Shostakovich xx … (mother is the 20Y old mare)
3Y old : Alligator Fontaine - Sir Shostakovich xx … (mother is the 19Y old mare)

I had one foal in 2015 : a colt from Iowa KWPN out of the Quality Touch mare

The 17Y old mare by Parco xx is in foal from Simplex xx (foaling date late april 2016).

I also have a SF-filly by Jaguar Mail (born 2008), actually ridden by a young woman in southern France (mostly SJ, a bit EV)
And I still have the full brother of this filly (born 2009), still working with him as he matures slowly (physically and mentally).

And finally, I have the brother to my 3 old mares who is actually my riding horse (as little as I ride nowadays) … He is by Campione out of the Farnese mare.

as for my writings here, please bear in mind that English is only my third language …[/QUOTE]

If I am reading your pedigree notes right, your 3 year olds is out of a Sir Shostakovich XX daughter, while the sire Alligator Fontaine has both grandsires as XX?
and your Parco XX daughter is in foal to Simplex XX.

This is a high amount of TB close up.

I would appreciate your reasoning for selecting such high percentage XX sires with such close direct XX ancestry, versus say a linebred Selle Francais, KWPN or Holstein as sire.

I ask as it is the opinion of several that TB should remain farther back in the pedigree and close TB is too risky / will damage the jump.

What are you breeding for: Show Jumping, Eventing?

Thank you,

[QUOTE=Elles;8394286]
I started the topic.
So could you tell me a bit more about the following please:
What made the whole discussion hardly bearable is that the original poster never was in a position to manage this thread, being constantly on the defense.[/QUOTE]

I don’t know the manners here on this forum, but generally when I open a discussion in the other forae where I write, I keep an eye on the discussion to not go off topic or to wholy change in topic.
Likewise when the discussion is too heated, I try to put out the biggest fires.

You didn’t do this, because ‘you yourself’ was under fire for constantly going back to the 60s / 70s / 80s.
So you never were in a position to manage ‘your’ discussion.

this sentence was absolutely not meant as an attack … sorry if it came across like this !

[QUOTE=D_BaldStockings;8394462]
If I am reading your pedigree notes right, your 3 year olds is out of a Sir Shostakovich XX daughter, while the sire Alligator Fontaine has both grandsires as XX? and your Parco XX daughter is in foal to Simplex XX. This is a high amount of TB close up. I would appreciate your reasoning for selecting such high percentage XX sires with such close direct XX ancestry, versus say a linebred Selle Francais, KWPN or Holstein as sire. I ask as it is the opinion of several that TB should remain farther back in the pedigree and close TB is too risky / will damage the jump. What are you breeding for: Show Jumping, Eventing? Thank you,[/QUOTE]

When someone tells me that he likes papers with TB in the 3rd / 4th / … generation … for a TB to stand in these generations, someone has to use them ! And when someone who likes TB in these generations doesn’t want to breed a TB … then he is, in my opinion, intellectually dishonest, because he intents to reap what he didn’t sow (as already said in one of my msg above).

What I breed for depends on the individual horse … meaning if the horse shows jump and gaits and blood why not considering to event him ? The sport in which he / she competes doesn’t depend on his paper, but on his abilities !
Intuitively, I’m attracted to blood horses, the lighter the better. And with this said, I really don’t consider a horse to be exclusively a EV or SJ genitor.

I hold some opinions which are not very popular, but are the fruit of my analysis.
Generally when one has to be make a decision, more than one possibilities can be considered. In breeding at the time when I started with a heavy mare, you could go slow by using light WBs or you could choose to do it faster by using ‘Veredlerhengste’ (TB or AA). I choose the faster way … and because I also have a profond fondness for light horses and even the lightest WBs of that time didn’t ‘do it’ for me, considering the offspring would be a mix of my mare and a WB.
The second point is, in my eyes, the future of SJ competitions is not higher - wider, but competion will be intended for horses with more technic, more elasticity, more maneuverability, more flexibility, better recuperation capacities and better reactions. And more solidity.
The power of the jump isn’t the ultimate judge anymore.
And third, I am convinced (but this is just MY opinion nothing more nothing less) that the WBs have a tendancy to become heavier if you stop perfusing ‘light blood’, meaning TBs or AAs. (This I already stated in one of my postings above with Capitol I as an example).

My first mare, my basis mare, had to be bred to very light horses and I didn’t have generations to reach this goal … The question was which TB and after some errors (with TB and WB), the choice of Sir Shostakovich was the right one. Having two fillies by him I choose another one, Parco, very different then Sir Shostakovich. And again I had a filly.

In 2007 I was approached to breed an eventer for a friend, if we could find a stallion for both our goals (her : eventing - me : breeding). That stallion was Jaguar Mail. The filly out of this reunion was very much TB-like … I loved it ! But subsequently, we found out that she didn’t have the gaits to be an eventer, but she had a very very good jump - and she became a SJer !

Considering that a foal out of Jaguar Mail and a mare by a TB could be a very good jumper, I decided to continue on that way.
Quality Touch has a very good paper - Quick Star out of Sevada (mother to Classic Touch) - and was all what I considered good in a stallion : excellent paper, good career in SJ, good progeny and beside the head, a good model. The filly born in 2011 was good without being excellent in conformation as a foal. But maturing, she was all I expected her to be !
She is an even more refined version of her mother and qualified at 2 years for the French National Championship, where she obtained the best marks for freejumping and 7th place over all (German equivalent would be ‘Staatsprämienstutenschau’ but for 2 years old and with the freejump). That was in 2013.

In 2011, I decided to use a stallion who I liked very much for his career (to this day the stallion with the highest French performance index for a stallion - ISO 190) and his paper : Alligator Fontaine. He is also said to be a very good mother’s father … His model too is very much what I like, though a bit to big …
He became the father of the filly born in 2012. She too qualified for the French National Championship, where she placed 9th. That was last September.

Having been given a present by the stallion owner for the succes of the QT-mare, I choose a stallion of whom I had expectations to maintain the light model of his mother. This stallion is Iowa KWPN, excellent paper, good career, very much like Landgraf (his grand-father) but in a more reduced model. The foal, born in 2015, won the regional championship here in HN Le Pin and qualified for the National Foal Championship.

And finally, I love to experiment !
And even though my mares are all direct descendants of TBs, I always fear that the heavier model of my basis mare will come through over the generations.
So I participate in the ‘Route des Etalons’ every year to look at TB stallions, after studying their papers, videos, photos, careers.
I choose Simplex xx because he is a TB with a good career in terms of number of races, his progeny matures early, he has a good model and an excellent character. All the foals by him I saw (all TBs) had correct gaits even for a sport breeder, nice characters, good models.
Does this make him a sport stallion ? well we have to wait for the birth and then some years to know if this risk was worth to be taken.

There was one other point I considered : I saw 2 years ago a TB stallion by Montjeu out of a mare of the Nagaika female tail. He seemed to have it all : great model, excellent paper with references even in the sport breeding (Narow, Noble Roi, Nouveau Roi, etc). He was, in my eyes, one of the best candidats for a ‘Veredlerhengst’ … Alas, when I contacted the owner for his use on a sport mare, they told me he was put down …
So when I see a stallion, a TB stallion, who fulfills all my desires in all aspects … I wouldn’t hesitate anymore.

Over the years and this since 1991 when I used the first TB stallion, I read, looked at, analysed all writings, pedigrees on TBs in sport breeding and sport performance. I am convinced that if you choose correctly the TB, there is no danger of it being a flop, because he compensate his shortcomings with other traits (those mentioned above) as essential, or even more, as power.
Do I sacrify the F1 generation ? Not in my eyes and also not in breeding time terms : breeding is a generational activity.

To choose a TB stallion for a sport mare correctly, you have to evaluate his model in terms of WB-model and he has to have gaits (difficult, I know !). If you can persuade the owner to jump him … that’s even better.
But in my eyes, there are no pre-dispositions for a TB stallion to be used in WBs. I don’t care if he was a stayer or a miler, he has to have a model compatible with WB breeding.
I tend to very much look at horses said to have liked profond terrains. I don’t care for their winnings, but I appreciate solidity, shown by an important number of races run.

In all my breeding choices, I try to follow my gut feelings …

When someone tells me that he likes papers with TB in the 3rd / 4th / … generation … for a TB to stand in these generations, someone has to use them ! And when someone who likes TB in these generations doesn’t want to breed a TB … then he is, in my opinion, intellectually dishonest, because he intents to reap what he didn’t sow (as already said in one of my msg above). What I breed for depends on the individual horse … meaning if the horse shows jump and gaits and blood why not considering to event him ? The sport in which he / she competes doesn’t depend on his paper, but on his abilities ! Intuitively, I’m attracted to blood horses, the lighter the better. And with this said, I really don’t consider a horse to be exclusively a EV or SJ genitor. I hold some opinions which are not very popular, but are the fruit of my analysis. Generally when one has to be make a decision, more than one possibilities can be considered. In breeding at the time when I started with a heavy mare, you could go slow by using light WBs or you could choose to do it faster by using ‘Veredlerhengste’ (TB or AA). I choose the faster way … and because I also have a profond fondness for light horses and even the lightest WBs of that time didn’t ‘do it’ for me, considering the offspring would be a mix of my mare and a WB. The second point is, in my eyes, the future of SJ competitions is not higher - wider, but competion will be intended for horses with more technic, more elasticity, more maneuverability, more flexibility, better recuperation capacities and better reactions. And more solidity. The power of the jump isn’t the ultimate judge anymore. And third, I am convinced (but this is just MY opinion nothing more nothing less) that the WBs have a tendancy to become heavier if you stop perfusing ‘light blood’, meaning TBs or AAs. (This I already stated in one of my postings above with Capitol I as an example). My first mare, my basis mare, had to be bred to very light horses and I didn’t have generations to reach this goal … The question was which TB and after some errors (with TB and WB), the choice of Sir Shostakovich was the right one. Having two fillies by him I choose another one, Parco, very different then Sir Shostakovich. And again I had a filly. In 2007 I was approached to breed an eventer for a friend, if we could find a stallion for both our goals (her : eventing - me : breeding). That stallion was Jaguar Mail. The filly out of this reunion was very much TB-like … I loved it ! But subsequently, we found out that she didn’t have the gaits to be an eventer, but she had a very very good jump - and she became a SJer ! Considering that a foal out of Jaguar Mail and a mare by a TB could be a very good jumper, I decided to continue on that way. Quality Touch has a very good paper - Quick Star out of Sevada (mother to Classic Touch) - and was all what I considered good in a stallion : excellent paper, good career in SJ, good progeny and beside the head, a good model. The filly born in 2011 was good without being excellent in conformation as a foal. But maturing, she was all I expected her to be ! She is an even more refined version of her mother and qualified at 2 years for the French National Championship, where she obtained the best marks for freejumping and 7th place over all (German equivalent would be ‘Staatsprämienstutenschau’ but for 2 years old and with the freejump). That was in 2013. In 2011, I decided to use a stallion who I liked very much for his career (to this day the stallion with the highest French performance index for a stallion - ISO 190) and his paper : Alligator Fontaine. He is also said to be a very good mother’s father … His model too is very much what I like, though a bit to big … He became the father of the filly born in 2012. She too qualified for the French National Championship, where she placed 9th. That was last September. Having been given a present by the stallion owner for the succes of the QT-mare, I choose a stallion of whom I had expectations to maintain the light model of his mother. This stallion is Iowa KWPN, excellent paper, good career, very much like Landgraf (his grand-father) but in a more reduced model. The foal, born in 2015, won the regional championship here in HN Le Pin and qualified for the National Foal Championship. And finally, I love to experiment ! And even though my mares are all direct descendants of TBs, I always fear that the heavier model of my basis mare will come through over the generations. So I participate in the ‘Route des Etalons’ every year to look at TB stallions, after studying their papers, videos, photos, careers. I choose Simplex xx because he is a TB with a good career in terms of number of races, his progeny matures early, he has a good model and an excellent character. All the foals by him I saw (all TBs) had correct gaits even for a sport breeder, nice characters, good models. Does this make him a sport stallion ? well we have to wait for the birth and then some years to know if this risk was worth to be taken. There was one other point I considered : I saw 2 years ago a TB stallion by Montjeu out of a mare of the Nagaika female tail. He seemed to have it all : great model, excellent paper with references even in the sport breeding (Narow, Noble Roi, Nouveau Roi, etc). He was, in my eyes, one of the best candidats for a ‘Veredlerhengst’ … Alas, when I contacted the owner for his use on a sport mare, they told me he was put down … So when I see a stallion, a TB stallion, who fulfills all my desires in all aspects … I wouldn’t hesitate anymore. Over the years and this since 1991 when I used the first TB stallion, I read, looked at, analysed all writings, pedigrees on TBs in sport breeding and sport performance. I am convinced that if you choose correctly the TB, there is no danger of it being a flop, because he compensate his shortcomings with other traits (those mentioned above) as essential, or even more, as power. Do I sacrify the F1 generation ? Not in my eyes and also not in breeding time terms : breeding is a generational activity. To choose a TB stallion for a sport mare correctly, you have to evaluate his model in terms of WB-model and he has to have gaits (difficult, I know !). If you can persuade the owner to jump him … that’s even better. But in my eyes, there are no pre-dispositions for a TB stallion to be used in WBs. I don’t care if he was a stayer or a miler, he has to have a model compatible with WB breeding. I tend to very much look at horses said to have liked profond terrains. I don’t care for their winnings, but I appreciate solidity, shown by an important number of races run. In all my breeding choices, I try to follow my gut feelings …

In my research on TBs, I have found that all pure dressage TBs in the past fifty years who have reached International GP have come from the Hyperion sireline, which goes back to Bay Ronald. Since so many German WBs also derive from the Bay Ronald sireline, that might suggest that looking for his descendants close up (and as many as possible) might be a way to find sporthorse gaits.

This is one of my idees fixe as is the benefit of having all three of the TB foundation sirelines in the first five generations, plus the sires of the mares in the 5th. I believe this adds something both in performance and breeding. I believe that Herod is truly helpful, and he is increasingly hard to find within five generations. Matchem seems to be only active in the United States, but can still be found in Europe farther back through Precipitation.

Which Nagaika are you referring to? The 1954 French mare or the 1967 German one? If the stallion you are talking about was Noble Sang, his damsire was Windwurf, whose dam comes from the magnificent German Waldrun mare line which has produced so many excellent TB stallions used in sport horse breeding.

[QUOTE=vineyridge;8395013]
In my research on TBs, I have found that all pure dressage TBs in the past fifty years who have reached International GP have come from the Hyperion sireline, which goes back to Bay Ronald. Since so many German WBs also derive from the Bay Ronald sireline, that might suggest that looking for his descendants close up (and as many as possible) might be a way to find sporthorse gaits.

This is one of my idees fixe as is the benefit of having all three of the TB foundation sirelines in the first five generations, plus the sires of the mares in the 5th. I believe this adds something both in performance and breeding. I believe that Herod is truly helpful, and he is increasingly hard to find within five generations. Matchem seems to be only active in the United States, but can still be found in Europe farther back through Precipitation.

Which Nagaika are you referring to? The 1954 French mare or the 1967 German one? If the stallion you are talking about was Noble Sang, his damsire was Windwurf, whose dam comes from the magnificent German Waldrun mare line which has produced so many excellent TB stallions used in sport horse breeding.[/QUOTE]

yes it was Noble Sang ! and Nagaika was his grand-dam !

For the rest of your post …
in SJ no contest that a majority of the TB stallion lines goes bach, in fine, to Eclipse by the way of St Simon or Bay Ronald, but there are others too :
Furioso goes back to Matchem
Julio Mariner by the way of Tourbillon to Matchem
Sir Shostakovich goes back to Bend Or
Hand in Glove to Bend Or
Count Ivor to Bend Or
Parco to Bay Ronald
Anblick goes back to Isinglass - Isonomy
Sire (father of AF) goes back to Blandford - Isinglass
Ultimate to Blandford
Orange Peel to St Simon
Barnaul to Fairway - Bend Or
Laudanum to Blandford
Cottage Son to Son In Law - Bay Ronald
Fra Diavolo is a Teddy
Turner a Tourbillon
Sacramento Song is a Prince Rose - St Simon

It’s not as clear cut in SJ as you said it is in dressage breeding.

It is to be expected that when nearly 50% of the TBs are of the Sire-line of Nearco that the sport TB stallion line do the same, probably even more because Nearco stands (or stood) for quality …

just to end the reflexions on my horses …

When looking at my young mares, people find it always surprising that the QT- mare is much much more TB-typed than th AF-mare … with nearly 20% less TB-blood mathematically.
And my answer is always the same : look at the mothers (full sisters) -
the first one is very much TB-like while the second was is build like a carriage horse.

http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?showpic=10711217&time=1439125103
http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=10804704

Okay, thank you for the clarification.
I love to play Sherlock Holmes investigating bloodlines :-).

[QUOTE=OBdB;8394651]
I don’t know the manners here on this forum, but generally when I open a discussion in the other forae where I write, I keep an eye on the discussion to not go off topic or to wholy change in topic.
Likewise when the discussion is too heated, I try to put out the biggest fires.

You didn’t do this, because ‘you yourself’ was under fire for constantly going back to the 60s / 70s / 80s.
So you never were in a position to manage ‘your’ discussion.

this sentence was absolutely not meant as an attack … sorry if it came across like this ![/QUOTE]