Paid deposit now seller is ignoring?

[QUOTE=gumtree;8174966]
“And there are at least 20 states that require Coggins for horses to be sold”

13 states according to this website. http://www.horsetradertricks.com/coggins--scary-facts.html

Florida
Georgia
Illinois
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Mississippi
New Jersey
New York
North Carolina
Ohio
Texas
Vermont

These states require a current Coggins for any horse shipped on public roads.

Florida
Louisiana
Mississippi
New York
Oklahoma
Texas[/QUOTE]

I found this fairly fascinating, as Virginia wasn’t listed.

Apparently, the Code changed in 2011. The way it’s now written is pretty crappy, as it does not address foals at foot, and is vague enough that it could encompass any horse at a boarding facility. i’ve been under the impression that Virginia did not require a negative coggins on foals at foot and under 6 months.

I was wrong. I believe i will clarify this with the state vet.

http://www.vdacs.virginia.gov/animals/pdf/2%20VAC%205-70.pdf

I received an answer from the state vet - Virginia. Should they attend an “equine event”, foals are not required to have a coggins under 6 months and still nursing. I was directed this page, where they buried that tidbit:
http://www.vdacs.virginia.gov/animals/pdf/eia-faq.pdf

You also need a coggins in WI to sell a horse

This thing got so far derailed it turned into another form of transportation.

[QUOTE=roseymare;8175616]
You seemed to be intent on proving me wrong. I did the research too and twenty states require either a Coggins every year, a Coggins for a sale or Coggins for travel on their highways. I went to each individual states statutes. Your list is 19 and if you add in Arkansas where by law every horse needs a Coggins yearly it is twenty states that require a Coggins for some form of a sale whether it be to sell the horse, to move the horse or to have the horse. I was not throwing out advice without facts.
Maybe someone else will answer the contract question since you refuse to. I feel that if it is required by law in a state then a bill of sale does not need to spell it out. Obviously it would be better if it did for all parties but I don’t think if it is not the owner of horse at the time of sale is somehow absolved from providing a Coggins in those states.[/QUOTE]

No, it is never my intent to prove you wrong anyone wrong pre-say. I don’t play that game, thought it does seem to be popular. I think most people that have read my various comments in the forum the would say I am not given to being snarky as a rule. Even if I think the comment is completely asinine and or has no bases in fact.

If someone offers up facts that are more current and or counter the facts as I know them I am the first say I stand corrected.

“The Devil is in the details” or in the wording. Which has been basically what I have been trying to say in my various comments in regards to the buying and selling of anything. Especially horses.

First, not my list, read what I said about that list; “According to this website” I made no guarantee that the list was complete nor accurate. Surprisingly it is quite difficult and time consuming to find out what states require what for sales and or transport without going state by state. And time consuming reading through the statues to find something that directly addresses the question. Also states can and do change their statues at any given time. So what may have be the law of the land last year may not be this year. Word to the wise.

According to THAT list 13 states require a current Coggins must be included with the sale of a horse in THOSE states. In other words without checking the exact wording of each state’s statutes I can only assume that ANY seller private or commercial must supply at their cost a current Coggins WITHOUT being asked by the purchaser as part of the sale.

You brought up Arkansas so I checked their statues regarding the sale of horses and the need for a Coggins to be part of the transaction.

2-40-819 Testing requirements for change of ownership.
(a)(1)(A) All equidae which are sold, bartered, traded, given free of charge, or offered for sale, or any horses otherwise exchanged for any reason within Arkansas except at approved markets must be accompanied by a record of a negative equine infectious anemia test conducted at an approved laboratory within the previous six (6) months.
So that brings the “un-official” list of states requiring the seller to supply a current Coggins as part of the sales transaction to 14. To confuse things even more it seems in some states a “current” Coggins can be within the last 12 months and some the last 6 months.

The second list of 6 states, 5 of which on included in the list above it require a current Coggins to travel with the horse when being shipped around WITHIN those states. So does Arkansas, so that brings this list up to 7 states.

2-40-823 Requirements of equidae moving within the state.
All equidae moving within the state for any reason shall be accompanied by a negative current official equine infectious anemia test.

I did not address how many states require the OWNER of a horse, not a horse for sale just a horse/s in their possession and or under their care to be tested Annually. I would like to believe every state does but I don’t know that for fact. I have no interest in checking every state. I know what my state requires.

I would like to believe that most responsible owners, care takers pull Coggins as a matter of course along with vaccinations without being told and or required. I would like to believe most responsible seller that has horses on offer do the same.

But it is still up to the purchaser to perform “due diligence” BEFORE signing on the dotted line and handing over payment. Which is what this whole thread has been about. Check and use facts do not assume anything. Every state has and uses different “rules and regs” when it comes to sales and purchase. And as is illustrated “health papers” and requirements.

“I was not throwing out advice without facts” but you said;
“And there are at least 20 states that require Coggins for horses to be sold”
Not trying to pick on you but “at least” is not a fact, in my book it is a guess. If you wanted it to be a fact list the states.

“I feel that if it is required by law in a state then a bill of sale does not need to spell it out”

In my opinion you have answered your question. But most horses are sold by “hobby” owners and sellers. And have no idea or the “rules and regs”. And how complicated things can get if either buyer or seller “assumes” a lot of things.

So to make sure there are no misunderstandings a purchaser should include in their well written Offer to Purchase contract everything they want as part of the sale regardless of their “protection under their states laws”. Taking legal recourse under state law is a PITA and can be expensive. Win, lose or draw.

[QUOTE=IPEsq;8175656]
There are some additional states, like Colorado and Wyoming, where the buyer will need to have a brand inspection done, which requires a current health cert and bill of sale for the horse to be registered to buyer with the state and for some travel within the state (usually a certain number of miles of travel) and outside of the state, and the health cert requires having a Coggins #.[/QUOTE]

So how do they handle Thoroughbreds that are not branded. Do they consider their lip tattoo the “brand”

When I lived there the “travel distance” was I think 75 miles from “home”. A friend said it had something to do with the “rustling days”.

I had a brand inspection done for my old (non-branded) horse, and thinking of it I need to go ahead and get one for my new-ish OTTB. They just marked “no brand” and recorded other markings, much like a Coggins, including photos of her.

Figured I would update everyone.

So far the lawyer has been spoken to. She helped with the correct steps I need to take.

Certified demand letter was sent. Refusal of signature and returned back to me.

Spoke with courts and all paperwork has been mailed. Looks like September is when the hearing will be.

Thanks for the update…sorry it’s been dragged out into a real sh**show.

OP – Thanks for the update. I don’t know if it would help you at all, but I consider myself a reputable selling agent and I have sold a number of horses for clients over the years. I adopted my sales procedure under the guidance of a lawyer and thought I’d share it in hopes that it will help you in the future. If this no longer interests you then please feel free to disregard…

If a person tries a horse and decides they want to pursue purchasing the horse the process I follow is:

a) Buyer makes an offer and I counter the offer until a purchase price is settled.

b) Buyer leaves a deposit that is 10% of the agreed purchase price and signs what I call a Purchase and Sale Agreement. This agreement outlines all the details of the sale including the full contact information of all the parties involved, the full description of the horse, and the FULL terms of the sale. This agreement is four pages long and was written by a lawyer.

It puts time stipulations on how long a buyer has to perform a pre-purchase exam (usually 7 days). It also states that the deposit is only refundable in the event that the pre-purchase exam is not satisfactory and that the full balance of the purchase price must be paid within 24 hours of the pre-purchase exam. It also states that the horse will be held off the market during this time and it has specific stipulations for when the transfer of ownership is official and how long the buyer has to remove the horse from the present location. At this time, I also provide the buyer with copies of registration certificates and coggins tests (I do not consider it normal to provide copies of full medical records but would do so upon request, at the buyer’s expense).

c) The pre-purchase exam is scheduled and performed by a licensed veterinarian under my direct supervision.

d) Depending on the results of the exam, the buyer either completes the sale or declines to buy the horse. If the buyer declines, the contract becomes null and void, if not, the buyer has 24 hours to pay off the balance owed on the horse.

NOTE: The agreement also contains an option for the buyer to decline a pre-purchase exam. They can sign off on the exam and will have X number of days to payoff the balance owed in full.

e) Once full payment has been received, I provide buyer with a Bill of Sale that states that all the requirements of the Purchase and Sale Agreement have been met and full ownership transfers to the buyer. This is a signed document and states very clearly the “Effective Date of Sale”, which is the date responsibility for the horse transfer to the buyer. I also give the buyer all the original registration certificates and other necessary documents pertaining to the horse. Once this has been completed, based on the terms in the Purchase and Sale Agreement, the buyer has X number of days to arrange transport and remove horse from the premesis.

A couple things to note, I never accept cash payments. Ever. A wire transfer is preferred but, most of the time, a certified check is acceptable. My agreement also states that no sale is final until the check clears the bank and I will not sign the Bill of Sale or let the horse leave until it does. There are a lot of details in the agreement beyond what I outlined and I know there are people who are a lot more lax than this but I usually deal with expensive horses and, so far, the above approach has never failed me (knock wood).

I’m so sorry you’re dealing with this. Best of luck in court. I hope you can get your money back!

Have been following this…any results?

[QUOTE=Jackie & Starlette;8225285]
Have been following this…any results?[/QUOTE]

Hearing not until September per post 285

Was kinda wondering once they got served (and even though they refused) if they coughed up the deposit to avoid courts…

[QUOTE=gumtree;8178887]
So how do they handle Thoroughbreds that are not branded. Do they consider their lip tattoo the “brand”

When I lived there the “travel distance” was I think 75 miles from “home”. A friend said it had something to do with the “rustling days”.[/QUOTE]

Most horses are not branded in those states. “Brand inspection” no longer signifies an actual brand, it’s just a figure of speech from olden days.

I bought a horse in Colorado and had to have a brand inspection so I could trailer the horse, and to leave the state. A state brand inspector comes out and looks at the bill of sale and confirms the identity of the horse to the bill of sale. Then he gave me a little yellow paper, a form certifying the ‘brand inspection’ had been done and the horse is legally owned (not stolen, I suppose).

The law in the state is that every horse & owner has to have that slip of paper to prove the horse is legally owned. If you bring a horse in from elsewhere I think you still have to get one, and have to have one if you sell the horse in-state. Theoretically you could be in trouble if you were on the road with the horse, especially crossing state lines, and didn’t have that piece of paper with you.

It’s not a big deal to get one, it’s just a phone call and an appointment with the inspector, along with your paperwork showing you own the horse.

In reality I never heard of anyone being asked to show their brand inspection. It’s just another piece of paperwork, another government form and another government job … and I’m pretty sure there is a nominal fee as well.

[QUOTE=gumtree;8178887]
So how do they handle Thoroughbreds that are not branded. Do they consider their lip tattoo the “brand”

When I lived there the “travel distance” was I think 75 miles from “home”. A friend said it had something to do with the “rustling days”.[/QUOTE]

Missed this initially.

It’s kind of a misnomer. There is no actual “brand” issue in most cases. Although, if horse has a brand, it is noted on the paper like they do with all distinctive markings, similar to a Coggins paper. It is the state’s way of helping people avoid “stolen horses” issues. If I had bought my horse from another brand jurisdiction, I would have to show the original brand inspection to get my CO one done. Horse was not purchased in a brand jurisdiction, but I did have to show a bill of sale to prove I am the owner as well as health papers.

Okay, it’s now October…what happened?

[QUOTE=Jackie & Starlette;8341063]
Okay, it’s now October…what happened?[/QUOTE]

Ditto. :yes:

Curious myself. Any news?

Maybe she’s busy repairing her friend’s trailer?

http://www.chronofhorse.com/forum/showthread.php?475408-Horse-damaged-friends-trailer-what-would-you-do

[QUOTE=IPEsq;8226424]
Missed this initially.

It’s kind of a misnomer. There is no actual “brand” issue in most cases. Although, if horse has a brand, it is noted on the paper like they do with all distinctive markings, similar to a Coggins paper. It is the state’s way of helping people avoid “stolen horses” issues. If I had bought my horse from another brand jurisdiction, I would have to show the original brand inspection to get my CO one done. Horse was not purchased in a brand jurisdiction, but I did have to show a bill of sale to prove I am the owner as well as health papers.[/QUOTE]

Yeppers. And to add more info: In Colorado, the brand inspection is the only ownership document that matters. The brand board steps in when there is an ownership dispute and uses the brand inspection history on the horse to settle the issue. They are useful in the case of theft. The brand inspection is also a permit to transport the horse, and the basic inspection must be reissued if the horse is transported more than 75 (I think it is…) miles, but you can request a permanent card on the horse that will allow unlimited traveling. Brand inspection documents must be with the horse during transportation, and the brand board does have the right to seize the horse if documentation cannot be produced. Horses are required to be inspected at time of sale and before transport to their new home, and the brand guys can really make your life difficult if you don’t follow their rules. You don’t want to piss off your local brand inspector.

That said, I really appreciated all that they do, and I like having the additional documentation on my horses. I always had the permanent cards, and even got one on Pigs before I left the state, just to have one more piece of documentation on who he is and that he is mine.

Here’s an example of a permanent card. My name and address is on the back, as well as registry info and some additional info about the horse including color and weight. There’s also a listing of the fees ($43 for this one, although the price has gone up considerably recently.)

I understand this is probably all really weird to someone who hasn’t lived in a brand board state, but it’s really odd to me to not have this sort of required documentation here in MN after living all of my horsie life in CO.