[QUOTE=jennycash;8155138]
Well finally got in touch with agent. “Call it a lesson learned. If you can’t afford the horse don’t put a deposit down.” All this because I asked for vet records for shots, teeth, ect.
Police said it was civil matter so I have to go to Small Claims Court and deal with it there.
Because the “contract” that was written does not state it was refundable or non-refundable do I have an legal standing?[/QUOTE]
Was the “agent” working for you or for the seller? In other words did you call/ask the agent to find you a horse? If so the agent was working for you. If the agent called you about the horse, well, this can be a bit of a “grey” area. A lot of so called “agents” just work the “street”. They “hear” of horses for sale either directly from the seller or another agent. That agent may or may not be the “authorized” agent for the seller. This should be clarified when someone calls offering a horse. This is a big difference between an “agent” and a “broker”.
An agent for either party has a fiduciary obligation to “work” for and in the best interest of one party or the other. They cannot legally work for both without full disclosure and to keep things legal and to protect themselves a “dual agency” disclosure form should be written and signed off on by both the seller and the buyer. Commissions being paid, how much and by whom needs to be stated. It is perfectly legal to receive a commission from both sides as long as it is disclosed and accepted.
Brokers basically work for their own interest.
An agent is supposed to not only be well versed in the buying and or selling of horses but also to the legal paper work needed to protect their client. They should know how to draw up any and all contracts needed to protect their client. But they should also advise the client to have the contracts reviewed by their attorney. This is not always necessary but the agent should advise and it is up to the client to have it done or not.
The contracts I use were written by my “horse” attorney years ago. I just “tweak” them to fit the deal. But I have lots of different ones to work from. I would never use a “non horse” attorney. They don’t have a clue about all of the “nuances”. And you will pay for their education while they do the “research”.
If you want to post the exact wording of the “contract”, you can leave out names addresses, I will be happy to comment on what I think your options are. And how to go about things before going to small claims court. Keep in mind getting a judgement does not get you a check. The court will just “direct” payment not force payment and or collections. But the person will have a judgement noted on their credit report and public records. You may be in a position to sue both the seller and the agent.
Doesn’t sound like we are talking a lot of money here. I would be very surprised that either would want to go to court over this and take a chance of having a judgement levied against them. The wording of the contract will reveal a lot.
All it may take is a properly worded “letter of demand” written and properly executed to get them to come to their senses and send you a check.