People who own pets they can't afford...

…or the story of how I probably ticked off my mother-in-law! It just drives me crazy when people get animals and don’t consider the long-term costs like vet bills. I am sure I am preaching to the choir here but I just feel all riled up about this. When my husband and I first started dating, his parents had two dogs–a blind cockapoo and an older morbidly obese lab. Neither ever went to the vet. The lab eventually died from what I think was diabetes. The cockapoo lived a miserable existence. Never got groomed and had terrible matted fur, was blind and also seemed deaf. He eventually died too of some unknown cause. I always hated going over to their house because that dog was so miserable. He smelled not just like a matted stinky dog but also of death. He had feces caked to his behind. Had lumps and oozy ears and was just a sad sight.

After the first lab died, they adopted a one year old lab mix. This was about 6 or 7 years ago when I was still in college and my husband was living at home and in school. The dog was WILD and had way more energy than what a 55 year old couple needed. But she was sweet as could be and I took a liking to her so when I was home visiting I would work with the dog to train her and walk her and take her to the park. But once again, the dog never went to the vet or got medical care. The dog also became morbidly obese like the previous lab. But not my dog, all I could do was offer my suggestions to take her to a vet and also put her on a diet. Which were never followed.

Eventually now-husband and I both finish school, get jobs, move away. We go home for the holidays and dog is still fat with too much energy and no one to exercise her and infested with fleas. They also have a sad-looking FIV positive cat that wanders the neighborhood. When we were home for Christmas, I noticed the dog has an apple sized lump. I tell mother-in-law and she says “oh, we know, it’s been there a while” but they can’t take her to the vet. Well today she posts on Facebook, oh dog’s lump is bigger what should I do? I comment well, have you taken her to the vet? And of course she has this sob story about how last month she got laid off of work and they can’t afford the vet etc. But last year they also bought a brand new 2017 Dodge Ram 1500, which start at about $28,000! For Christmas she got me a new Kitchenaid mixer that I did not ask for! I was appreciative but would have rather she used the money to take the dog to the vet! And the lump has been growing for a year now so not like it is a new issue.

I just ended the conversation by saying I am sorry to hear dog isn’t doing well and I hope you are able to find the money to take her to a vet because part of owning a pet is getting it medical care when necessary. This was a long-winded post, but it just drives me crazy. Why do they keep getting animals if they can’t afford the medical care? Or aren’t willing to prioritize their expenses to pay for the vet even though they can afford a new truck and new oven/stove and other such things. My husband and I have two cats and my horse and in the last year both cats have seen the vet for their annual check-up. One cat has been in twice for a skin allergy and a UTI. The horse has been seen too many times to count for a corneal abrasion and then a lameness exam and knee injection. But that’s part of owning animals. I just hope the dog is okay because she really is a good dog. I’m hoping the lump is just a fatty growth and not cancerous or anything but we will probably never know.

Once an animal comes into your house as your pet you have the responsibility to take proper care for it. Period.

5 Likes

That has always been my mentality too and it’s a shame others don’t seem to agree. I’ve been sitting here thinking that maybe if she dropped her pack a day cigarette and 6 pack of beer habits they could afford vet care for the pets…

3 Likes

It’s possible you’re seeing more a generational thing rather than a financial one. Just 30 short years ago, people did not take their pets to the vet unless something was seriously wrong. If you had a fat dog, you just walked it more or fed it less. That’s not to say you didn’t love it. It just how it was. You certainly didn’t have well pet visits back then.

I remember the first time a vet asked me when I last had my cat’s teeth laser cleaned and I asked her what she was talking about. I’ve had over 20 cats over the years and never once had teeth done. I’ve never had one live fewer than 14 years, so I’m still thinking it’s a very unnecessary and costly experience. I’m sure younger people are gasping and judging me as they read this. Just pointing out that you need to take into account how things were in different times. Once upon a time, most dogs were “outside” dogs. Everything evolves. It just takes time with some things.

13 Likes

It always shocks me when a friend I value, doesn’t value their family member.
I do whatever I can for ny pets, while other people’s get hit by cars, picked up by animal control, or decide thry are now a breeder.

1 Like

While I totally agree and my vet bills back me up, some people have a different mentality. I’ll use my dad as an example…he adopts older big dogs usually 10 yo plus. He gives shots himself, gives flea/heart worm treatment, loves them, gives them a happy few years. When they get lumpy, can’t get around, quality of life goes done he takes them to our cousin who is a vet and has them PTS. They get a few years of love and a very dog friendly lifestyle.

I dont consider that that an unkind owner, he has time but not willing to drain his limited retirement fund on treatment of an animal.

Many times its lack of knowledge in how to take care of a pet properly. You don’t know, until someone explains it.

14 Likes

A lot of it is genetics. I see vastly more dogs in need of dental help than cats. Up until recently I had two Snowshoes, both adoptees, not related. One had horrible teeth, was prone to cavities which are rare in cats. I had to clean his teeth at least every 18 months, and he was down to 3 teeth by the time he died. Other cat, same food etc, I finally cleaned his teeth at age 12 so that I wasn’t doing it when he was 14

I was just in the vet’s office on Thursday. A couple came in with their two dogs to get Bortadella vaccinations because they were going on vacation and the boarding kennel required Bortadella. Without missing a beat, they told the receptionist they couldn’t afford monthly heart worm meds.

1 Like

I agree people shouldn’t get animals they can’t or won’t care for.

i also agree that sometimes the teeth thing seems excessive. Luckily I have a great vet who is much slower to recommend tooth work than the clinics I used before who wanted to do annual $5-600 cleanings on each cat and dog. I didn’t think that was necessary and it was a lot of anaesthesia which can always go wrong. My vet only recommends it now if there is an issue. I have have had one pet need his teeth done in 6 years under this vet (not counting horses which I have done annually of course).

3 Likes

I’d like to comment on the fact this dog has a lump and remind everyone that sometimes, not all lumps are health issues. My Doberman has a lump on his shoulder. I regularly get people glaring at me and making snide comments about how I should take him to the vet and get it removed. He has been to the vet, the lump has been biopsied and it is a fat cyst. It’s filled with what the vet likens to oil. We could remove it, but it’s right on his shoulder and wouldn’t heal as well due to the location. He’s thin skinned and the area is more likely to tear than heal. So the vet told us to just keep an eye on it to make sure it didn’t get bigger (it hasn’t in 4 years). So not every owner who lets a lump stay on a pet’s body is bad or neglectful. I take great care of my pets and they eat better than I do, but I would rather leave a harmless lump on my animal instead of risking infection and skin tears because of the location.

7 Likes

Yes, definitely, I should have made that clearer in my original post! Not all dogs with lumps are being neglected. My issue is that the dog has never been seen by a vet to even evaluate or biopsy the lump. Is it a fatty cyst or is it cancer? Who knows?! My childhood dog had a lump on her side that was tested by a vet and diagnosed as a fatty lump and we never had it removed because she was old. I just wish they would take the dog in to at least get the lump looked at by a vet to see what it is. It keeps growing and the dog has other issues too. I would hate to see the dog slowly die of cancer. Both the previous dogs the in-laws owned had slow, miserable deaths and were never kindly put to sleep because it was too expensive.

4 Likes

I think these situations are less about what people can afford and more about the choices people make about the quality of life for their pets. I probably can’t afford pets, but my dog eats Acana, exercises daily and has pet insurance. He lives a charmed life. I do what I can. You don’t have to spend a fortune on animals, but you do need to make choices so they aren’t fat and miserable from any number of animal problems, like fleas, heart worms, allergies or what have you. Sometimes those small choices have huge repercussions for pets and it’s super difficult for some humans to make those decisions. It’s often just selfishness and it’s super frustrating to watch.

6 Likes

While I agree with most of what is said here but I don’t think many are prepared for more then basic care…shots… wellness exams …dentals and minor emergencies. And I don’t think that makes them bad pet owners. Example I had a small breed dog break a leg. The vet bill was almost 8k when it was said and done. I was foudrtinaute that I was able to get a loan. And I keep a 1500.00 credit card solely for pet emergencies over the basics but I wasn’t prepared for a 8k vet bill and I don’t think many of us do. The older pet owners are on fixed incomes and it sad that they can’t get the vet care either because they can’t afford it or they are simply from a time when you wouldn’t think of spending a lot on a pet and sadly these pets are in some cases the only companionship they get.

5 Likes

I agree with both and I feel that the test is whether the animal is suffering. Suffering is not ok!

I also feel it’s ok for a person to choose to euthanize rather than pay an 8k vet bill, even if they “could afford it”.

7 Likes

Sure, I can see that regarding a huge bill. I chose not to have a surgery in that range done on an older dog. I did take very good care of her while she lived, and had her euthanized when her life became too painful.

I’m not going to forget when my co-worker was called by her house mate and told her cat was badly injured and she chose chose not to even go home and have her mortally wounded cat put down. She just sat in the office crying, and said it would be too expensive to bring the cat to the vet for that. She just let him die under the house. Not long after that she brought in 5 pairs of expensive jeans to show off, that she had just picked up while shopping.

3 Likes

Yes, it angers me also. When you get a pet, you need to put aside some money for emergencies. they happen. All the time. If you cannot afford to put anything aside, then don’t take the pet.

2 Likes

I have absolutely zero patience for that crap.

My brother and his family are the WORST about this. Let’s buy the $500 puppy, then let it die because we don’t feel like taking it to the vet, or because we just bought a brand new couch and can’t afford it. I have taken more of their freaking animals to the vet than I can count. I paid to have two of their horses euthanized because they were suffering and they ‘couldn’t afford it.’ I’ve had five of their cats spayed, because I was sick of paying for their kittens. But by George, they can buy Laura Ashley and an $80,000 mobile home and designer clothes and pay to have their adult kids live with them.

There’s just no excuse. None. I don’t care. You can suck it up and pay for the animals (if that means euthanasia over surgery, so be it), or you can not own them. But you don’t let them suffer and you don’t put your own stupid wish list over their well-being and health.

4 Likes

Hi
I agree that sometimes PTS is a option and reasonable with giving circumstances. Looking back I should have aputated the leg. But I still got my guy…8k later…:slight_smile:

I had a dog who required surgery when he broke both radius and ulna in a freak accident. It was quite pricey but the thing was…it was really hard for me to justify bowing out of a “one and done” type surgery. He was a very young dog and he healed up just fine. I would have more trouble, for example, doing expensive surgery or treatment on an older pet to garner a few extra months. Likewise, I elected to put down a 5yo kitty I had because he was in kidney failure. The vet said i could do dialysis but he would ultimately need put down, probably sooner than later. That’s the choice I made. Could I have afforded the dialysis? Yes, probably. Was it the right decision one way or the other? YMMV.

1 Like

I didn’t mean to imply that it was a bad decision to pay it! Just that it is a lot of money, and I wouldn’t fault someone who chose not to do it! I’m glad your guy is doing well! I hope I never have to make such a decision.

1 Like