Yes, there is, and it could conceivably take up all the weekend slots. Unlikely, but possible.
They might ride their individual tests during the time frame, but they do not compete against each other.
1 Like
Not dag but in dressage youâre only really competing against yourself.
1 Like
Just like an open card. All the 2â6" rounds for the day are run at the same time, but you may have 3 divisions being scored and placed individually.
2 Likes
I bet more barns would leave their beginners at home to learn vs going in the Walk/Trot classes at WEF if they could more easily find people to teach them while away. This rule change would open up some options for this situation.
And FWIW, this happens at events sometimes too (albeit smaller ones). At the mini trial Iâm headed to this weekend, theyâre running BN Open and BN Rider with alternating competitors (i.e., each division taking turns) to make sure everyone has enough time between dressage and show jumping. Theyâre still being scored separately for the divisions, but theyâre running as one large group.
I can see where it could get a bit complicated with the hack schedule-wise but to me thereâs no major reason why over fences classes over the same course at the same height canât be run as an open card.
1 Like
Interesting logicâŠ
You really think that the only reason trainers take their beginner students to a horse show is because there is no one left at home to teach them more?
I would think it has more to do with the fact that people want to horse show, people want their kids to horse show, and the barn is going to this horse show anyway so taking their beginners to this fun experience makes sense.
Leaving them at home with some other instructor will only make those people go to some other barn where they are taken to the horse shows.
10 Likes
You hack them first, if possible. If you run ALL the hacks and flats first, back to back, then everyone in the first handful of rotations is already there and ready to go and no one is waiting around for Suzie to wander back up from the barn or free up in the jumper ring.
It doesnât work with certain types of classes or every show but there are plenty of times you can set the course, run the hacks for the day for that height, jump everyone around on an open card, then run any callback flats or âspecialâ classes, then reset for the next height and repeat. Or, hack everyone, get people in rotations and run one or two divisions together before running the next.
We got rid of the jog already, so a little shuffling around of classes and cards seems less wild than⊠whatever this rule change is. At least to me.
4 Likes
Reminder that this âfun experienceâ comes to the tune of $1000-$2000. Not a ton of folks that have been in the sport for ~12 months jumping up & down at the idea. When they head to another barn, itâs often because there is no one left at home to teach the beginners when the show team is on the road.
It is really hard to find up/down instructors and keep them long term.
6 Likes
Yes. I agree that it is expensive and all that stuff.
But, I also do not think that people go to shows just because there is no one at the barn to teach lessons.
Which is what the post I responded to was saying.
4 Likes
Iâm going to say something that is super controversial here. Nix the Pro vs Amateur distinction all together.
Itâs impossible to police and just creates animosity within the horse world. The label has nothing to do with your riding ability.
Letâs be real, what matters more is the size of your wallet. A lot of Amateurâs who were born into money or have wealthy families which gives them the ability to put more time, effort, and money into competing than low to mid-level pros can get or do.
If want an example and think distinction between pro and amateur matters, please go to any show and watch the wealthy amateur walk in on their 6 or 7 figure horse, with their Olympic coach and put most of the so-called Pros to shame.
We shouldnât be punishing people for trying to keep themselves in the sport. If they teach some lessons, do some training rides, sell some horses, etc. who cares. We should celebrate these people as they are doing what is necessary to stay in the sport and setting examples of working hard for something you love to do.
15 Likes
Why would that not be true, then, of every discipline? As long as they give blue, red, yellow, etc. ribbons, itâs as much a competition as it is in any other discipline.
Because in hunters you donât get a score (other than in the classic) and judging is always based on ranking the horses seen THAT DAY. Year end awards are based on points that go off pinning based on ranking that day.
In dressage you always get a score and judging is based on how close you were to ideal that day. Year end awards are based on averaging those scores.
If in a hunter round everyone chipped and ran, someone is still getting a blue. And that blue is worth the same as next week when everyone was so flawless that the judge was breaking ties based on tiny minutiae like whose turnout was better. Both those blues are the same and neither rider knows how close or far they were from the mythical 100.
In a dressage class, if everyone sucked, no one is getting a score over a 50. And that you got a 49 and someone else got a 48 doesnât mean you were good. It means you sucked the least. You get a score sheet showing where you earned and lost points. And next week when the highest score is a 80 and the lowest was a 79, those people know that they rocked it. Even the lowest person in the high 70s knows they did well. And the people scoring in the 50s arenât getting a year end award even if they never appeared at the same shows as the people who scored in the 70s.
8 Likes
Donât kid yourself. One of the things they teach in the judging programs is that judges must rank the class correctly. The class they are seeing THAT DAY.
2 Likes
So what do you propose division be divided by instead?
Show experience? Show results? Annual income? Net worth?
Because a person who is wealthy because they work a full-time job in a high-paying field and can afford a fancy horse but only has time to ride 3x/wk is still going to have an uphill battle against a trust fund kid who can ride multiple 7-figure horses per day, even though theyâre both amateurs.
I donât know that there is any one way that makes it âfairâ for everyone, but Iâm not sure reclassifying instructors of beginners as âamateurâ is going to make things better overall.
4 Likes
Thatâs exactly what I said?!
8 Likes
Agreed. Thereâs a reason horse shows are adding more and more very basic entry level divisions for beginners, and Iâm pretty sure itâs not âthe beginners wanted to stay home and learn but they had to come to the show because thereâs nobody to teach them since Suzie wants to keep her amateur status.â
4 Likes
[quote=âSticky_Situation, post:182, topic:796545â]
So what do you propose division be divided by instead?
Show experience? Show results?[/quote]
^^This is the only way to come close to a level playing field, if that is the desired result.
3 Likes
Not @dags and itâs been more than a minute since I showed dressage.
Some of the shows would run an open card with open, amateurs, and juniors. In some cases, everyone had to enter the open class and then you could add the junior or amateur for an additional fee, which might have been $20 at the time. What you got for your added fee was an increased chance of getting a prize or a ribbon, which is how I happened to walk off with two blue ribbons and two Del Mar mugs at the end of a pretty large first level class. Riding a TB. If it was a test that could qualify for USDF stuff, you could also tack that qualification on but Iâm not sure if there was ever a separate set of ribbons for that.
Other shows ran the amateur division separately. The amateurs often preferred this as there was a perception that the judging was harsher in the open classes, making it harder to get qualifying scores.
For California Dressage Society (CDS) championships, the cutoff percent for a qualifying score was lower to qualify for the amateur division at the championship show. Not sure about USDF regionals (no USDF nationals in my day).
CDS also runs a separate amateur championship (actually three, in different parts of the state) so thatâs a bonus for being an amateur.
But, since qualifications and horse of the year standing are based on scores, people tend to care less about ribbons.
Iâm not sure how getting rid of the amateur divisions would solve everything. You have everyone in one class, making it theoretically harder for a less experienced person to get a ribbon, and thus points if that matters to them.
I say theoretically thinking about jumpers. I have won and placed well in large open meter classes because over half the class was trainers prepping eq horses and racking up the time faults.
Iâm not a judge, but my understanding is that they donât love dealing with multiple cards in very large classes. Mixing in the amateurs and juniors would make keeping track of those cards plus the open cards kind of complex, at least IMHO.
2 Likes
This would be a very interesting and perhaps best way to divide the competitors. An âopenâ division at each height where you can have all the folks who have won/accumulated x points at that level and the ârestrictedâ division at each height for those who have never won at that level or have fewer than x accumulated points at that level/height. Get rid of pro/amateur entirely and maybe add an even more âeliteâ division at the big shows only open to those riders who have accumulated a large number of wins/points. This would allow riders with not as fancy horses to compete against similar animals, less experienced riders to compete against similar riders, etc. So three divisions at 2â6âelite, open and restricted and so on up the height scale.
3 Likes
