I found this under a stallion’s name on HorseTelex and am not sure what it means. Can someone interpret it?
aangew.verr.ond.
2011: SI 3 DR 146 22%
I found this under a stallion’s name on HorseTelex and am not sure what it means. Can someone interpret it?
aangew.verr.ond.
2011: SI 3 DR 146 22%
Anyone want to take a crack at it?
Placed 3 with a score of 146 in dressage. not sure about the 22% Will go look
His Tb percent
[QUOTE=stoicfish;6616025]
Placed 3 with a score of 146 in dressage. not sure about the 22% Will go look[/QUOTE]
Placed 3rd where? Can’t be at an SPT because this particular stallion hasn’t been performance tested yet.
[QUOTE=stoicfish;6616027]
His Tb percent[/QUOTE]
No, the ox/xx percentage is on a separate line.
aangew.verr.ond.
2011: SI 3 DR 146 22%
XX/OX rate: 32,62%
Post the link. It is hard to guess otherwise.
This horse? http://www.horsetelex.com/horses/pedigree/714762
Yes.
[QUOTE=DownYonder;6615321]
I found this under a stallion’s name on HorseTelex and am not sure what it means. Can someone interpret it?[/QUOTE]
Looks like:
Approved 2011
SI - Studbook Italy 3rd Pl?
Dressage score 146.22
Approved with BaWu
Wurttemberg.
[QUOTE=Noms;6616090]
Looks like:
Approved 2011
SI - Studbook Italy 3rd Pl?
Dressage score 146.22[/QUOTE]
Hmm, I would be surprised if it is Italy. For one thing, he is with Edward Gal (or at least, he has been - is apparently supposed to do an SPT this fall). And for another thing, I think the main Italian WB registry is UNIRE (Unione Nazionale Incremento Razze Equine).
[QUOTE=Noms;6616093]
Approved with BaWu
Wurttemberg.[/QUOTE]
I am not sure that approval will hold since he hasn’t met any stallion performance requirements.
It means that he is approved by the Wurttemberg registry ( the site was not updated since he seems to have lost his approval) However he was accepted to the KWPN performance test (aangew.verr.ond.) means that, but did not participate as of yet so he is not KWPN approved.
In 2011 his breeding index was 146 in dressage with a very low reliability of 22%.
I don’t know about the SI but it’s not the rank that is for sure.
[QUOTE=bloomingtonfarm;6616621]
It means that he is approved by the Wurttemberg registry ( the site was not updated since he seems to have lost his approval) However he was accepted to the KWPN performance test (aangew.verr.ond.) means that, but did not participate as of yet so he is not KWPN approved.
In 2011 his breeding index was 146 in dressage with a very low reliability of 22%.
I don’t know about the SI but it’s not the rank that is for sure.[/QUOTE]
SI is normally followed by the Showjumping Index.
[QUOTE=bloomingtonfarm;6616621]
It means that he is approved by the Wurttemberg registry ( the site was not updated since he seems to have lost his approval) However he was accepted to the KWPN performance test (aangew.verr.ond.) means that, but did not participate as of yet so he is not KWPN approved.
In 2011 his breeding index was 146 in dressage with a very low reliability of 22%.
I don’t know about the SI but it’s not the rank that is for sure.[/QUOTE]
Wasn’t that his first breeding year?
Ah, thanks so much, Bloomingtonfarm and Feather River!
So more questions - since he has not a performance test of any kind, and has no offspring yet under saddle, how did they calculate his dressage index?
And is the lack of a jumping index because there is nothing to base it on (since he is a dressage stallion, and again, has not done a performance test)?
That’s a really interesting question. I don’t know the answer, but I’m wondering if show results are one component of the rideability index, and because of that there was one lonely number to plug into the calculation. Did he show?
It probably has something to do with the new way of calculating the inheritablity scores which takes into account ancestors/relatives???
The reliabiltiy of a breeding index is very important. 22% is low because he has no offspring in sport.
The breeding index is calculated taking the sire and dam breeding index so this is just a potential. As the offspring of the stallion get older and present themselves at keuring or performance test their reliability goes up and ususaly reach a peak when the offspring are 10 years old.
So the breeding index is volatile untill I would say the offspring reach 7 years old when it tends to be a more reliable number.
I find that the breeding index is higher with a low reliability and tend to get lower as they are more reliable.
The number of offspring has a huge impact also on the reliability. More is better of course so you may have offspring of 7 to 10 years old but the stud still have a low reliability because of few offspring which doesn’t make it statisticaly strong. When you see 70 to 75% it start to be reliable meaning it won’t really change with more offspring.
However for mares, 60% is VERY high , I don’t think I ever saw more than 66% because they can’t have so many offspring as a stallion.
[QUOTE=DownYonder;6616819]
And is the lack of a jumping index because there is nothing to base it on (since he is a dressage stallion, and again, has not done a performance test)?[/QUOTE]
This database is administrated by the Dutch so if there is no indication the breeding index is always for the KWPN and will specified if from other registry. Since the separation of the jumping versus the dressage you will not find anymore dressage index for the jumper’s stallion and vice versa.
It used to give both index but the dressage horses do not have to do the free jumping at the studbook and , even if they score the walk and trot for the jumpers, the total points only include the canter and the jumping component .