Q: Anyone know exactly what drugs cause “EPO antibodies”?
Racing lawsuit will be reheard
At issue is the allegedly illegal ban of a horse at Charles Town.
By Beth Henry / Journal Staff Writer
POSTED: July 2, 2008
CHARLES TOWN - An ongoing legal battle involving a horse banned from Charles Town Races & Slots took another turn recently when a circuit court judge weighed in on the matter.
The case involves an appeal filed in Jefferson County Circuit Court before Judge Gina Groh, in which horse owner Kevin Patterson claims that the West Virginia Racing Commission and the Board of Stewards at Charles Town Races have illegally banned his horse from racing.
Charles Town’s stewards prohibited Patterson’s horse, Brooklyn Bridge, from thoroughbred racing when they placed it on the track’s veterinarian’s list indefinitely on June 8, 2007. They said the horse’s standard blood test showed “high EPO antibodies,” and decided that the horse was to remain on the list, unable to race, until “an EPO antibody reading is below the cut-off standard.” The Racing Commission upheld that decision in February.
The problem is, there is no West Virginia racing law that prohibits EPO antibodies or provides an acceptable “cut-off standard,” according to Patterson’s attorney, Paul Weiss, who filed an appeal of the Racing Commission’s decision on March 5.
Weiss said the Racing Commission’s attorneys, who work in the state Attorney General’s Office, have not been able to show that a statute against EPO antibodies exists, and it appears that the stewards and the commissioners have acted well beyond their lawful powers and authority.
“It’s absolutely shocking,” Weiss said in a recent interview, adding that his client has suffered financial harm and lost more than $19,700 because his horse has not been able to race.
Weiss said Patterson does not deny that the EPO antibody was present in the horse, but says the antibody itself is not a drug. The presence of the EPO antibody simply suggests that the horse was exposed to erythropoietin, or EPO, at some point in the past.
His appeal stressed that Brooklyn Bridge’s blood test showed no impermissible drugs in its system.
Patterson said he’s extremely frustrated with the situation because Brooklyn Bridge is a good horse, but it’s 11 years old and nearing the end of its career. He has owned the horse about eight years, and said neither he nor his trainer have exposed the horse to any illegal substances.
“I keep feeding him and keeping him happy, hoping for the day he can race again,” Patterson said in a phone interview last week from his farm in Chambersburg, Pa. “This is the first time we’ve ever had a situation like this happen.”
He said he is seeking support from the Charles Town Horsemen’s Benevolent and Protective Association and the national HBPA.
“It is real important that all horsemen pay close attention and support this case, because the outcome of this lawsuit could have an effect on them for years to come,” he said last week. “We as horsemen cannot continue to let the commission and the stewards make the rules up as they go.”
In the appeal, Weiss also claims that the Racing Commission violated Patterson’s due process rights, denied him fair consideration and failed to follow standard hearing procedures in regard to transcripts and official records.
Senior Deputy Attorney General Tom Smith, who is representing the Racing Commission in this case, could not be reached for comment.
After reviewing the petition for appeal and considering motions in the case, Judge Groh issued an order on June 19 that calls for the Racing Commission to set a new hearing date, and grants Patterson’s request for the court to stay enforcement of the administrative order. That means his horse can be removed from the veterinarian’s list and allowed to race while the legal proceedings continue.
Weiss said he is happy with Groh’s order because it granted some relief to his client and should allow the horse to race for the time being. Weiss also said the judge got right to the main point of the case.
“She said the same thing we’ve said from day one - ‘show me the statute or regulation that prohibits EPO antibody,’” Weiss said Tuesday afternoon in a phone interview.
Weiss also said if Brooklyn Bridge is not allowed to race, the track would not be following the judge’s order.
“If we have any further difficulty with them, I do believe that would be contempt of court,” he said, adding that Patterson intends to enter his horse in a race this weekend.
Patterson said he tried to enter Brooklyn Bridge in a race this past Saturday, but the stewards did not allow the horse to be entered because the Racing Commission’s attorney had not informed them about Groh’s decision. However, he faxed a copy of the order to the stewards and was told there shouldn’t be any more problems complying with the court order.
Weiss said it’s not over yet, and he is waiting for the Racing Commission to set a new hearing.
“We’re pleased with it for now,” Weiss said.