I’m considering switching my easy keeper over to a ration balancer. Low NSC rating is important to me, and of course there’s the ambiguous statement on each saying “Low NSC”. From my research, Purina is around 13.3, Tribute was, what… um… 15? And TC was 9.8%. So TC is my choice there. He’s currently getting TC Sr.
Also of concern is the added selenium. I’m in CT/ US where Se levels are generally low and it’s not uncommon for many barns to supplement without testing firs. I’m not so secure in that fact but I’m not hot to spend $80 on a test that really becomes a moot point… when selenium is already added to a ration balancer.
Given these trains of thought, which of the above would you steer toward? Why? Are you a brand loyalist or have you had better experience with one vs. the other?
Horse is essentially a retired, healthy 17 y.o. QH G. He eats about 4lb TC Sr daily and about 15 - 18 lbs of hay. Currently in a dry lot t/o situation. He’ll get a few hours of pasture a few times a week come spring/ summer…
He’s ever so slightly more chunky than I’d like him to be, but not a panic and not affecting his health.
Appreciate any opinions. Thanks.