Rebels Invited to change the NHJC By-laws

Well the duties of the Zone Committee will be the next changes to work on in the next article. Hopefully, I’ll find time this week.

Anyone with some writing ability should send articles to their local papers and magazines, and your local horse news letters. There are several sites here on the web that will publish “editorial” type articles.

The more of you who do that, the more of you who include this topic on all the BB’s that you visit and start a dialog the better.

I think the issue of revising these by-laws to make the NHJC a democratically run association that is accountable to the members is the best legacy we can leave the children.

Our success will depend on how well we NAG…NAG…NAG…NAG them all and let them know we care. If the NHJC does turn us down and ignores our proposed rules changes then we can petition the AHSA for assistance, the Executive Committee and the Board of Directors of the AHSA who have the final say on this matter.

Go to our site: http://www.hunterjumper.org and go to the bottom of the page and click on the “Reference” button. That opens our library of documents. We will keep adding to them.

I didn’t mean to imply that you are getting no support, Snowbird, but there is the perception problem again and it is something we continue to struggle with. I’m also not saying “carry on,” but I AM saying it seems like you are out in the woods alone on this one and that’s not a good thing. It may simply because this is a busy time for people right now (the BB is kinda slow–I wish I didn’t have the time to be on it right now, alas, but my knee is so screwed up I can’t ride and I haven’t been able to work, much less prepare and show, anything for over three months now).

Anyway, I am getting emails about the perception part, Snowbird. That’s why I’m saying this. Sometimes, one makes the effort NOT because it will achieve something, but rather because of the impression it makes, right? As long as its just one or two people out there, militant crazies of not, it carries little weight. It is tiring trying to get people to stand up and be counted, and I agree with you that it isn’t likely to ever succeed given this particular crowd, but that doesn’t mean we should stop trying. Why don’t you at least ask those who email you privately if you can copy snippets here and there from their emails–anonymously, of course–and post them here? I’m saying you need to find ways to indicate that support IS out there–otherwise, I fear, disbelief from the doubters may sabotage your efforts. Don’t give up on the campaigning, no matter how discouraging it seems. Campaigns take time to have an effect and they have NO effect if they aren’t visible!

Erin, first a note to you (or Weatherford): I’m not “going private” with this for a reason. I hope you can understand my desire to illustrate this process so that others will see the difficult process we are going through and perhaps as a result, support our struggles. If you do not understand my reasoning, feel free to delete these comments between Snowbird and I–but I hope you will read them first.


I’m also not saying “carry on,” but I AM saying it seems like you are out in the woods alone on this one and that’s not a good thing.

So then I gather what you really mean is you don’t think I should “carry on” and that I should quit because I am all alone in my views and as you say this is not a good thing.


Whoops, sorry. That was a typo, plain and simple: I meant to say I am not saying NOT to carry on… I think if you read it corrected, you’ll find it actually makes more sense.


I didn’t mean to imply that you are getting no support, Snowbird, but there is the perception problem again and it is something we continue to struggle with.

By making the statement you imply that I am getting no support and that somehow I have a problem with the way I am perceived. A negative statement in the above context reinforces the negative which might otherwise not exist, I do take that very personally.


I’m sorry you missed the “we” in that statement: if I’m included myself in the perception problem, there is no need for you to think I am talking exlusively about you. Moreover, I am only reporting what I’m encountered in private emails–and I’m reporting it publicly because I think it might help everyone to understand the process “we” are going through (and in that “we” I’m not just including you and I any more either).

It may simply because this is a busy time for people right now (the BB is kinda slow–I wish I didn’t have the time to be on it right now…

The BB is not slow as you well know that is a very lame excuse and not valid and very patronizing…you can see someone else hurt?


Really, Vik! Where ARE you getting this reading from? The BB has been, IMO, slow lately. There are no really hot topics generating huge responses, etc. I meant what I said. There was nothing hidden in that comment. Me? Want to hurt someone, especially you? WHY? Especially YOU!
Sometimes, one makes the effort NOT because it will achieve something, but rather
because of the impression it makes, right?

Unless, you are talking about yourself, I certainly have never needed to try and impress anyone. Nor would I do anything for such a shallow reason.

I’m sorry (again!), but you are misunderstanding me. I’m not talking about an “impression” in the egotistical sense. I’m talking about the impression of people working together to achieve a valued goal, of people hanging in there, carrying on, not falling by the wayside. That’s what I meant about doing things that show the inclusion of more people than just us diehards (or “militant crazies,” as we’ve been called).


Just because you think this is the right way does not make it so!..Your implication that there is no support is yours and that’s all…

Snowbird, surely you don’t really think I think that way? Remember, I’m a “take it or leave it” person? If you don’t agree, that’s OK. Perhaps I should put “IMO” at the end of every statement–but I ask that you consider it “there” even when it isn’t, OK? Moreover, nowhere have I said there was no support: I’m only saying that I’m getting emails that indicate that perception is out there. I want to figure out a way to counter that perception. I don’t know how we can do that, but I think…er, IMO…it may be important.


“I certainly wish that if you wanted to have this discussion you would have been considerate enough to do it privately.”

Is there any chance that I have convinced you NOT to take this private? I don’t know if anyone has read these last few exchanges, but they illustrate something good about you–and also about me–and about the way we are working, in our different ways and for our different reasons, on the same, very difficult goals. I can “hear” the emotions behind your statements–and I hope others can, too. I hope they can hear how much you care, how determined you are and how confident THEY can be that you are (and have been for a very long time) working very, very hard for the good of the sport with no motivations other than those you have described (something which, as I have admitted to you before, I cannot say about myself!). Please, don’t take these last statements as patronizing. In them, I am not really talking to you, but rather–hopefully–to others. I hope you can understand that.

I hope that the section will be up by tomorrow. Also, it occurred to me that I will underline the red text which we want to have added so that those of you who print it out will find it easier to recognize in Black and white copy.

The website for our little rebellion is up and running. We’d like all of your comments and they will be posted.
http://www.hunterjumper.org

I wonder if there is anyone who disagrees that as members we are entitled to know, and have the officers of the NHJC accountable to us a members?

I wonder if there is anyone who disagrees that we should have the duty to vote on the issues that affect our competition?

So far, I have not heard from anyone who believes this is the wrong approach and I would like to know so that I might be better prepared for any debate on the issues.

Your opinions would be valued.

I am what I am, I do what I do and if there is no one who cares so be it! That is democracy afterall.

You have your approach and I have mine. No doubt I have received as much email saying that they perceive you in a way differently than you would expect. And some have expressed concerns that your approach creates tangents which will get us all off course and accomplish nothing.

You come to a problem one way based on your personal experience and I approach a problem from a different point of view and from different experiences.

My experiences may not be so etherial but they have worked for the past 30 years in this industry. There will be people from all sides who have different perceptions, afterall perceptions are what one person gleans from their point of view, not always a lofty premise.

I have great respect for differences of opinion, I am very suspicious of any product which is unanimously approved, to me that frequently looks like a plot.

Since it is not my intention to manipulate the attitudes or rely on contemporary sales techniques but to simply put a view of the ideas forward for analysis and corrections.

I am a very simply minded channel. If no one wants to use the channel that’s their choice isn’t it? Generally, I find that silence is approval. You are likely to hear promptly and loudly from anyone who disagrees. It is much easier to bring negative ideas forward for attention, that’s one of the sad reasons for “attack” ads in todays politics.

The desire to achieve has been as much the cause of failure because it frequently inspires an anxiety which leads to, too much compromise. My intention is not just achievement but to be honest straight and up front and state the issues with a solution.

I really don’t think I need to be taught how to accomplish things or how to get along with people. That may be your field of expert but I haven’t seen any evidence of that yet. So until I am proven wrong I will take this approach and simply post what is my understanding of the issues in a fashion that will in my opinion accomplish our goal.

I prefer a record which is uncluttered with generalities and wordy preaching which usually only inspires whinning and moaning about world affairs.

[This message has been edited by Snowbird (edited 09-17-2000).]

None!

This thread is to discuss ways to change the the By-Laws of the NHJC. Your dialog is just a tangent that would take us off course and I choose not to join you there.

I think we have wasted enough time and space on personal issues that have nothing to do with the purpose of this thread or this board. I am certain that others are totally bored with our personal disagreement.

You as an expert in communication are obviously aware we have used up our 15 minutes, or you wouldn’t have felt the need to be apologetic to Erin and Weatherford.

I certainly am not at all interested in the perceptions from your personal emails, and I know no one is interested in the personal perceptions from my email. If I wanted to take lessons in communication I would sign up for a course with you. I’m not sure why you think that your ideas are interesting to me or any other poster.

If you prefer to lecture us from your podium by all means continue but please not on this thread.

If you wish to dialog on the issues at stake in this sport and industry I’d be happy to join you in the dialog.

I have added four more paragraphs the the Proposed Revisions. I have also changed the proposals of the NHJC to blue,i.e those not yet approved by the AHSA, ours are in red. So far all the paragraphs involve our right to know and a restructuring of the Zone Committees to be more representative of the general membership.

The voting procedure is next on the agenda.
Updated Proposed Revisions to the NHJC By-Laws

[This message has been edited by Snowbird (edited 09-19-2000).]

So does the silence regarding changes, omissions or additions mean that you all agree? Is there no dissention at all or is this project only the victim of negligence?

If you are interested in helping to pay for ads in advance of the convention you can email directly to me. I would be grateful for any help.

Please also print out from the website for posters or for ads in your local newsletters.
We need help from all over the country if this is to work. Remember we have no subsidies and no budget.

<BLOCKQUOTE class=“ip-ubbcode-quote”><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Snowbird:
I think that the misunderstand for JCH is just the difference between an AHSA Life member and the proposed Life member of the NHJC that isn’t a member of AHSA. I think we all agree that non-AHSA members shouldn’t be on committees.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
You’re right, it didn’t occur to me that they were referring to non-AHSA life members.

Snowbird,
Hi have looked over your proposals and I have toadmit there is so much there I’ll have to go backto it severaltimes and read slowly and sort of take it allin.I agree with what you ahve done so far up to the first portiona nd will revisit again.I honestly do not know how you do this, do you ever sleep ?

I have put underline in the sections of the Revisions that are done so far. That is the red portions so that if you print it out so you read it better you will still know the changes that we are asking for.

Basically the changes affect our right to know and our representation on the Zone Committees as well as the right to vote.

Remember we also have these proposed as Rule Changes and they are posted on the AHSA website.

The revisions as they progress will be posted to our website. http://www.hunterjumper.org
The Revisions so far, a work in progress are at: http://www.hunterjumper.org/BY-Laws.htm

[This message has been edited by Snowbird (edited 10-01-2000).]

Snowbird, will you please translate some of the alphabet soup for those of us that have come back to this recently?

Exactly what is the NHJC = and how long has it been around?

The US Hunter Jumper Organization, is this a new creation of your battleground?

Hope you don’t mind this history lesson…
The website is great.

Thanks, Kate

When is the deadline for proposing changes?

Thanks brilyntrip, I know and it is really tedious but since copies of the By-Laws are not available for us members, I thought this would accomplish both things so it was worth the effort.

The old guard firmly believes that we are not really interested in all this stuff, and if we want the right to know and the right to vote I think we need to demonstrate our knowledge.

The copy I received of the By-Laws was sent anonymously for our information. I’m doing it a little bit at a time both because of my available time and because I think it will be easier to follow. I hope that you will all print them out and circulate to those who may not be on the internet.

Looks pretty good to me. ANy comments from Portia, who is working on the AHSA By-Laws right now?

Dear Snowbird,
I have just ben able to get on line for brief periods of recent will try to read thruall ofthis this weekend and I’ll let you know what I think (not that my opinion is so important)

The deadline for rule changes was March 1st for us ordinary members. Committees had up until September 15th to submit their changes.
But if you have some ideas, now is the time to get them out on the table - let us hash them over and then submit them next year by March 1st.

Has anyone found yet anything with which they disagree in the proposed Revisions?

Does anyone have any questions for the work being done so far? Any difference of opinion?

Anyone interested can email to:
members@hunterjumper.org

It would be wonderful if you made copies of the advertisement and or did you own and had it included in all your local newsletteres.

There is also a color print that you print out and maybe even laminate and post in tack shops and at your local horse shows.