I was wondering about this yesterday based on something I saw as I drove home from Mom. There was a man riding his horse in the grassy separation between the interstate and the parallel front road. He wasn’t 15 feet from the pavement on the interstate, quite close.
I assume he was trying to traffic proof his horse, but it seemed like an extreme exercise. The interstate was very busy, including plenty of semis and one oversized load with weird big pipe things. The horse was lathered around his neck and breastplate. Horse was quite reactive, head up, body language :eek:, and they were spinning tight circles much more than going forward. The guy could ride and was doing a good job of keeping the horse from bolting, which the horse obviously wanted to do. Other than no helmet and his choice of riding location, I had nothing negative that I noticed about him in my approach and drive by. That was on a straight way, so I had half a mile to watch him. My horse radar went off immediately as I topped the previous hill :yes:, so I had several seconds.
The safety of this situation bugged me. Even if he was traffic proofing his horse, this was either a first lesson at that level or a bad enough day that I would have gone back for review to previous, less exposed steps. Had the horse dumped him, this could have been extremely, even fatally bad for horse, man, and/or traffic. But only later did it occur to me that he might have actually been breaking a law. The interstate clearly posts on the entrance ramps at regular intervals a whole list of prohibited things, including “no nonmechanized vehicles.” Do you think that riding a horse in that median strip that close to the interstate legally consists of riding ON the interstate and thus is prohibited and call-on-able? Or is it legally riding on the frontage road? Is the dividing line of those halfway between them? If so, he was to the interstate side of it, but no doubt, he would have claimed he was riding on the frontage road.
I didn’t call, as he seemed to be a competent rider and was keeping control at least then, though having to work at it. The horse was very upset by every body language signal he could give. I definitely wondered about safety here if the horse got away from him. Had I known of a specific law he was breaking, I might have called, but I didn’t even think of that “no nonmechanized vehicles” thing until later, and I’m still not sure it applied or if he was legally “on” the interstate.
I doubt I’ll ever see this again, but just wondered. The man could ride, but this really seemed to push safety limits to me, and for a lot more people than just him. Too much downside risk for upside “traffic-proofing” potential, IMO.