Very interesting contemporary assessment of Secretariat, trying to be objective. He did not mention one of the points I think added with Count Fleet, the fact that due to war time fuel restrictions, the tracks cut track grooming and maintenance down to absolute minimum. Hertz says Belmont was only grooming the track once a day, in between training and races. On Secretariat’s positive roster, I also think he benefited from TV. So many people SAW it. Secretariat was an emotional experience. I do definitely think he was a great racehorse, but I have wondered a few times what might have happened had Man o’ War (my vote for the title Big Red and for the best racehorse of the 1900s) been televised. He once won by 100 lengths. Multiple times won by double digits. Carried 130 pounds as a 2-year-old. We can compare through history all day; without having them on the same track, same day, hard to know.
But overall, as an objective evaluation, I liked this editorial. And his final proposal would indeed have been fascinating.
Blood Horse, July 9, 1973
Editorial - It’s simply signed “the Editor”
If Secretariat were to stop racing right now, 30 years hence, when the bloom has gone from our current infatuation with this horse, so we are left only with the cold tabulation of his racing record:
Chances are we would be obligated to place Secretariat in a niche with Count Fleet.
They were about the same kind of 2-year-olds, although Count Fleet was ranked higher on the Experimental Free Handicap, assigned six pounds above scale at 132 by the late John B. Campbell, while Kenny Noe Jr. ranked Secretariat only three pounds above scale at 129 pounds. In his last start at two, Count Fleet won the Walden Stakes by a Secretariat-type margin of 30 lengths.
At three, Count Fleet did not lose the Wood Memorial, beat a horse probably as good as Sham - Blue Swords - by three lengths in the Kentucky Derby and by eight lengths on an off track in the Preakness. Then he won the Withers by five in the mud and won the Belmont by a wide margin (25 lengths) in record time while injured.
At three, Secretariat inexplicably lost the Wood but demonstrated complete superiority over his contemporaries in winning the Triple Crown races in record times, and then added the Arlington Invitational, which probably was not a greater task than winning the 1943 Withers.
So the records of these two, right now, hardly are distinguishable, the reputations each enjoyed while racing probably are comparable, their greatness hailed no more enthusiastically than, perhaps, that accorded Graustark or Hoist the Flag before their injuries.
The point is that the Count Fleet niche of greatness, 30 years after he left the track, is below that level reserved for Man o’ War and Citation. Thirty years from now, Secretariat’s record, so far, probably would put him right there with Count Fleet.
It is our belief that Secretariat is more than that. Opinions die, however; records live. And Secretariat’s record is not likely to be enhanced, in retrospect, by running off from such as My Gallant, or Our Native, or Sham again in the Travers, or beating last year’s 3-year-old champion at scale weight in the Woodward or Jockey Club Gold Cup.
Handicapper Noe already has pronounced Secretariat seven pounds better than Key to the Mint, eight better than stablemate Riva Ridge, 15 better than Summer Guest by his Brooklyn Handicap assignment - and these are his closest rivals.
Secretariat’s true place in the history of the Turf cannot be attained with hollow victories gained by judicious selection of spots where weight, distance, and competition are favorable - management counted wise and prudent with an ordinary horse.
To be Horse of the Century, Secretariat must meet every genuine challenge. The only such challenge left for Secretariat in all the world is the 1 1/2 miles, uphill and down around irregular turns, clockwise, at weight for age against Europe’s best classic and older horses, the Prix de l’Arc de Triomphe, the greatest prize of all, run the first Sunday of October in Paris.
Why take the risk? Why accept such a challenge? Because it is a challenge. Because he might not win it. And that is what the sport of racing is about.