Any illusions I may have had on that front have gone out the window with the atrocious management of endurance riding under FEI rules.
Agreed, ground juries have long memories! It has been my experience that eventing ground juries tend to be more strict than dressage or show jumping. And I am skeptical that horses are medicated âfor the jogâ more than for the job.
I have to wonder about the âFEI show jumping is clean sportâ when the horses are getting all these chemical cocktails (even Trameel is a chemical albeit natural). For some reason I assumed, wrongly, that the horses were getting no medicines (chemicals) in FEI because is was supposed to prevent masking pain or discomfort. Those medicines alleviate pain, i.e., mask it. When I take a medication, I know that the root cause of my pain is not being fixed, my body has to do that, the medicine merely helps. And before you all go nuts about this, thatâs the story of the Olympics - drug free, remember?
But NSAIDS are not prohibited for Olympic human athletes, just for FEI horses, arenât they?
It always bothered me that the reporting was so piss poor. Published resources were either pointing fingers at AN or an avenue for a character witness testimony. There was very little information on what actually happened.
The groom was never alerted that she could return. After an extended amount of time, she decided to check on him (Nereo) and there was no one there overseeing the horses. Nereo was left alone with an empty, unsecured recovery drip for an an undetermined amount of time. There was no documentation visible (which is standard practice), including vitals or what was administered. After the were able to reach the veterinary team, AN had words. The vet threw his clipboard at AN prior to AN shoving him. Nereo was not easy to manage for the last trot up. They had a very specific regimen. Nereo utlimately did not recover well and the farrier had to get higly involved. He stepped down afterwards out of frustration.
There is a steep misunderstanding of what management of UL horses consists of and itâs largely due to how unwell received the information is. Injections arenât used only to keep a horse sound, theyâre also utilized to provide high level joint support.
Yes. This. In part, this is why I am continuing to question some the statements that the horse wasnât on Legend or Adequan. That doesnât make sense to me. It was an upper level jumper in its teens. I would assume itâs on a regimen of joint support. Most horses at that level are. Joint support like Legend and Adequan is different than the inappropriate use of intra articular steroid injections to prolong the competitive career of a horse that is not truly sound anymore.
I give my horses legend every week they jump for the most part. Itâs not to make them sound or mask pain but to optimize their comfort and support their joints/prevent deterioration. If ALL it takes is that to make an unsound horse sound that isnât much. Itâs not like giving a horse bute before a jog.
Iâd say most savvy people give horses adequan and legend before a vetting so it goes optimally. Again, if thatâs the difference between sound and unsound, the horse isnât unsound.
The pearl clutching around what it takes to manage a horse at that level is really shocking to me. Think of how hard they work and how they are stuck in a box most of the time they are at a show. Itâs not optimal for normal horse recovery (like a night of turnout).
I totally agree thatâs itâs not exclusively for the jog, but if a horse has a history, you know it has to be top of mind, especially if heâs just one of those funky question mark movers but still gets around the sticks just fine. I mean you canât lose a class or win it for that matter if you donât even get a ticket to play!
WADA rules crack me up. Stack nsaids? Sure. Gabapentin? Donât mind if I do! HCL/water pill, a super common blood pressure med? Better get that TUE form filled out!!!
There comes a point when I wonder if I have enough drugs in me that I will drip sweat on my horse and trigger a positive.
Because some people carry more weight. I donât think @OutsidersOpinion is saying a groom or owner could have stopped it from happening. I think they are saying the RIGHT groom or owner could have. Lee is a legend in the sport. I agree that there is no way a vet is risking ruining the relationship with someone like Lee or McLain when the other option is just wait for the owner to arrive.
But with someone who has their first horse competing at this level, where their name or relationship isnât as valued or doesnât carry as much weight - you can see how they have a lot less power in that situation, especially in light of the signed loan agreement.
No on would want to risk McLain or Kent or Laura saying âscrew this, Iâm never loaning a horse for international competition again.â But with someone who doesnât consistently send horses to that level - not a concern.
Thatâs partly because some of those innocuous medications are used to mask more performance enhancing ones
I highly doubt that that form the owner signed was kept anywhere available and even if it were I also feel it safe to say that the vet personnel and other USEF people in charge are not accustomed to having to show it to the grooms, as someone suggested. The release says what it says and the owner signed it. They donât have to call anyone, discuss it with anyone or explain it to anyone, per that release.
I also agree with poster who stated that had it been a high profile big marquee name or horse that the situation may have unfolded differently.
I donât know why people are assuming that there was a phone call between the vets.
I read that as, she said that her Vet was âavailable by phoneâ not that the Ridyah vet called him, but that he should have.
The owner said she had given the team explicit instructions that Chromatic was not to be given anything (meds) without her permission. Yes, she signed an agreement. IMHO team officials owed her the professional courtesy, and the respect as an owner, to notify her in advance of their plans. Thatâs what USEF officials agreed to.
edited to add: I donât care if Pepe or KC are considered big name people or not on the international level. To float the idea that if either one had better name recognition which would have made them untouchable, adds insult to injury.
There is a lot of discussion of this situation elsewhere, and many people are saying that there was conversation between the vets via phone throughout the horseâs time in Riyadh.
Oh, I know why, but I still giggled about the other 2 examples in comparison to the lowly little water pill
What âmany people are sayingâ doesnât mean much. If the owner said that, it would be different.
The owner has noticeably not made a statement about the vetsâ communications, except to say that treatments to the horse were supposed to be run by her or her vet. Apparently the treatments in question were not run by her. But were they run by her vet? Itâs unclear.
It seems clear to me.
@Virginia_Horse_Mom, that may be true, but perhaps not about this. I havenât seen anything to indicate otherwise.