[QUOTE=cdn_alter;8806526]
Happy for Nick, especially after everything he has gone through with Big Star! But I am disappointed for Eric.
Imagine having only 1 rail (in the final jump off no less) all week then being beat by someone who had 3 rails and a time fault over the course of the week. Same for Kent, Voyeur was on point all week but it caught up to him today and just got a little tired. Still, he had a lower total amount of faults then Nick. I believe the same goes for Peder, but I’m not certain.
I think this format is one of the reason non horse people don’t “get” show jumping at the Olympics, and why it isn’t actively broadcast. For example, person who knocks 2 rails can beat someone who only had a time fault, because of the day the rails were knocked down. They don’t get the point of having all those rounds if they won’t get counted. It’s just as easy to seed countries using FEI ranking points, Nation’s cup standing or even a regular draw. That’s just my opinion from watching the past few days of coverage with my non horsey friends, but I’d like to know what you all think.[/QUOTE]
Given that many sports operate at the Olympics with group stages and qualifying rounds, I don’t see how the showjumping set-up would stop members of the public from “getting it”.
In the women’s soccer, the three unbeaten teams from the group stages, Brazil, USA and Canada, all got knocked out by teams that had lost games in the group stages, with Canada and Brazil losing out in the semifinals to teams they had beaten in earlier rounds, Germany and Sweden respectively.
In many track events, you can qualify for the final by finishing fourth in the semifinal, and then go on to win gold in the final.
Don’t see how the showjumping is particularly confusing.