No, actually, that’s utter and complete baloney. I’ve retired two young sickle hocked dressage horses so far.
If the angle is at the hock, it puts the hock in a vulnerable position and each step puts more wear and tear on the hock. This is why dressage works SO hard to get the horse to step up by bending each joint of the hind quarter and swinging the leg freely forward, from the croup on down, just a slight bit, overall moving the leg under the body, instead of having the hock overbend.
This mare has several issues, and yes it is quite sickle hocked as sid says. And sid is not wrong about that; the folks who are contradicting her are. It seems we’re trying to start another myth at this bb, that Anne Gribbon’s letter unwittingly supported - that we can do anything with any horse, and that conformation issues don’t exist, or if they do, they’re actually advantages.:lol:
Actually, if I wanted to keep this horse sound for a long time, I would not plan a very active, demanding career for this horse, and I would not longe her or jump her. I would allow her to work a notch or two down from ‘very active, forward and correct dressage’ so she wasn’t working those hocks excessively hard. I would try very hard to keep her work consistent, so she was brought into a moderate level of fitness gradually and kept there very diligently, and I wouldn’t throw a long heavy workout at her one day or go for a long gallop or trail ride, just cause I felt like it. This sort of hock is vulnerable both to cumulative wear and to injury.