2 Likes
I’m curious what the reviewers say because I would not be comfortable using a study design like this to give any operational advice (what I’m paid to do for my real job). There are too many compounding variables that are not accounted for in the data points. It’s a big jump from the data saying there is a correlation between higher ranking, higher scores, and a stronger jaw/neck angle and then saying there is implicit bias or that judges only watch the front end.
(this isn’t condoning riding with a strong angle by any means, just critiquing study design)
8 Likes
