[QUOTE=sm;3478429]
Yes and no. To the USET, it makes no difference when he was found guilty of fraud (held liable for half a million dollars) if it was a civil court or not. What would the USET defense be for hiring the guy: he is not a criminal, it was a civil court case only? That would go over great at the fundraisers.
Technically you are probably correct, which is why I changed my post earlier. Mea culpa. However fraud still remains a criminal offense, and he is Persona Non Grata at the USET due to being found liable in court (if for no other reason).
Who cares if the guy is liked or not, that is completely irrelevant. Klaus would be out too with the same conviction.[/QUOTE]
Civil fraud is not the same as criminal fraud. Since I am a white collar criminal defense lawyer, you might defer to my expertise on the issue. A default judgment is not the same thing as a judgment rendered after an adjudication on the merits. A finding of liability is not a conviction. You cannot be “convicted” in a civil matter.
Now, if you want to say that having a default judgment rendered against you makes you person non grata at a USET fundraiser, you are entitled to your opinion. But somehow, I think a number of DQs would be lining up to train with him or donate to a team trained by him. Just as there are many who flock to horse agents in Europe with far worse records than his, including one that is on the interpol red list and has been charged in the US for attempted murder.
Also, I love that for some people, posters here will quickly point out there are “two sides” to every story. But if someone is unpopular or – shudder – uses unpopular training methods, any allegations against them must be true (do you not get that a default judgment means that the court entered a judgment on the uncontested allegations of the plaintiff???).