Unlimited access >

Spinoff: Appraisers, Assessors, and Fair Market Value (MA)

This is really MA specific, but tagging @frugalannie and @quietann since both of you mentioned interest. Maybe there are some other assessors or residential appraisers on the board who can lend their knowledge too.

In MA, the market right now is very hot. It’s been in a steady uptick for years, and saw a big swing up over the summer. Most property owners in MA that are in a settled area can expect to see an increase in their home values on January 1st – you(g) actually should be receiving your impact notices (which are your new proposed values) over the course of the next few weeks, if your local Assessor’s Office has not been severely compromised by the staffing shortage or COVID. The impact notices are not final - they are notifying you of your home’s proposed value, which the DOR has to finalize and you have time to appeal it. As a home owner, you have the right to appeal it if you feel the assessment is wrong (note: in MA you have a very small window to make your appeal - Appeal forms are not released until January 2nd, and must be returned by March 1st).

How is your home’s value established?
All towns in MA use a cost-basis approach to establishing the values of homes. Most – if not all – towns and cities use a software program like Vision to establish values; this cost approach is based on what it would cost in that present year’s market to make that home/residence/structure. These software programs are even more powerful than Excel in their versatility; they can denote things that diminish a home’s value like functional obsolesces and things like being near a highway, a train depot, a beach, etc. They are also often recalibrated and updated over the course of the year, keeping in mind market value and inflation.

Your local Assessor’s office also pulls in all arms-length sales (those within the neighborhood or zoning district) from the year prior into this figure; if a similar home in your neighborhood sold for significantly more than assessed value, that will factor into that home’s value – next year.

An Assessor has a good idea if their values are FMV by pulling their own subjects and comps; they should be in line with exactly what their assessed values were when done by software/cost basis approach.

Once your home’s value is established, the DOR vets it. All real property (taxable property) values are uploaded to the DOR – which then vetoes or approves the valuations based on their own software program and independent manual appraisal system, where they pull random subjects in your town and vet them against similar homes (called comparables). Yes – someone (multiple people) from the DOR goes over every municipalities’ published values, every year.

In MA, Assessed values must fall within 10% of Fair Market Value of that year. In more affluent towns, I see a better correlation between FMV and AVs; in towns where there is not much movement or sales, there tends to be a higher +/- disparity because there’s fewer sales to draw examples from.

In better funded towns, external appraisers (govt officials) are hired to work in conjunction with the assessor and verify their records are accurate and reflect FMV.

Remember that all AVs are published only once a year - they are a snapshot in time (Jan 1st of the year prior) based on sales from the year before and reflect the year before’s FMV. This is really important to remember when you are looking at your residence’s current value in the middle of the year.

Appraisers
Appraisers take sales prices of similar homes (comps) – ideally within the last six months and the more recent the better – and compare them to their subject property. They are working with recent data, whereas the Assessor’s office is pulling in year old data.

I will admit professionally I much prefer government/official municipality trained appraisers over non-gvt appraisers. The reason for this being that in my professional experience, many of the non-govt appraisers come to our counties or towns with outrageous appraisals, rile up the residents with their results, get the residents to submit an appeal, and then when we or the Appellate Tax Board review the appraisal, find out that the appraisers used ineligible comps, miscounted rooms, and my personal favorite, counted basements and unfinished attics in the living space. This happens regularly in my municipality. We have had no approved ATB appeals in the last 5 years, because not a single appraiser has been accurate in their appeal.

Some things that are important to know about appraisers – in affluent towns they almost always over-appraise because they pull from higher end comps, and in towns where there are very few sales, they have to pull from ‘noncomps’ which means it can be very difficult to establish an accurate value.

One thing I see often in my area when it comes to appraisals versus assessed values (AVs) is that appraisals factor in some extraneous values that AVs do not. A major thing my town in particular (and many in MA) does is it does not factor basement area or unfinished attics into the living area. Anything below grade is not factored into living area. So we will have 3,000 SF homes and an AV of 1.8 million-- and the appraisers will come along and count both basement and unfinished attic into the living area, say the home is a 4,000 SF home, should be worth 2.5 million, and then the residents want to appeal. This leads to a lot of confusion that really could have been avoided if the appraisers were held to a uniform standard and understood how municipality assessments operated.

Appraisers in general are generalists - they appraise a wide swath of residential communities or towns; Assessors generally tend to be niche specialists, who have been in that community a long time, and know the pulse of the community’s current market.

Not sure if that answered any questions, or opened more.

3 Likes

I’m not yet caffeinated, so my comments may be murky. What’s very clear is that you have posted an excellent overview of the tax assessment system. Thank you for sharing your knowledge @beowulf!

I’ve never worked in the Assessors office, but I have learned a bit from the homeowner’s point of view. A few years ago our property taxes jumped over 10% in a Prop 2 1/2 % town. So I decided to look into why. My dabbling led me down a rabbit hole which resulted in a 19 page appeal document, a 45 minute meeting with the Board of Assessors, them visiting my home for a walk through, and an abatement of over $5000.

If you have an interest I can go into the specifics of the appeal, but two more general points that I learned. Prop 2 1/2 says that taxes can only go up 2 1/2% per year unless the town votes for an override. Being naive, I thought that meant that absent any changes to our hone, out tax increase wouldn’t exceed 2 1/2%. In fact, it’s the tax increase on all the properties in town combined that can’t be over that limit. So if ours went up 10% someone else’s could stay the same or even be decreased. There are good reasons for this sometimes: a house may have been damaged or fallen into disrepair. But not always

And Beowulf while you clearly like the company your town works with, I am not so impressed with the one our town uses. The primary reason is that they use proprietary algorithms which they won’t explain and which members of the Board of Assessors admit they don’t understand. They can tell me what they think some of the calculations are derived from but when asked they really don’t know. That concerns me as a tax payer.

I hope to learn that I’m wrong and I hope to learn lots more from this discussion. Thanks for starting it @beowulf!

1 Like

I think it is normal for residents to have some misgivings about Assessors. Assessors decide the valuation of a home, which factors into how much tax we pay. And none of us like paying taxes. Myself included, ugh.

Depending on your Assessor, you either love or hate them. Assessors are sometimes like farriers - you ask questions about their work and they get defensive. Working alongside them, the personalities that get attracted into this particular deportment are not always generous. I’ve run into my fair share of town Assessors who only begrudgingly assisted me in certain projects. Sometimes its easier to get information from the admin assistants. There is that expression “good enough for government work”, and I hate to admit it sometimes it is true. It’s always good for a resident to ask questions IMHO, and more government officials should be welcoming these questions instead of getting their back up.

Prop 2 1/2 is confusing and a lot of people (including me originally) had the same perception of it you did. Like you said, it is based on the total tax levy.

This may not be the same case for your town as it is for the one I worked for, but the “Board of Assessors” was a committee comprised of selected-by-appointment residents, not appraisers/assessors themselves. These residents were volunteers who went with the Assessor[s] to monthly BOA meetings, where things like freshly renovated homes would be discussed. They would then go with the Assessor and verify the Assessor’s record[s], and the Assessor would take that information and compute it. The BOA themselves never were involved in that and had no access to valuation software - so that may be why your BOAs don’t know, too. The main function of having the BOA members is to have a non-government official verify and audit the accuracy of the Assessor’s records.

Did they mean their ‘proprietary formula’ was one of the valuation softwares like Vision? It would probably be difficult for a BOA or appraiser to explain the formula - but it shouldn’t be hard at all for an Assessor to. The software program is a lot like Excel - there are multiple fields with preset formulas, you enter in information and the formula does the work for you.

OK not in MA but here the value is as of January 1… so if this program has running updates how is that fair? or are the updates to be applied in the next tax year?

Also we have a 10% rule but the 10% is the maximum adjustment upward allowed

The program is updated/recalibrated over the course of the year. Not the value of the home.

thanks, make sense

1 Like

I don’t think we’ve ever applied for an adjustment, but that may because the assessed value (~600K) is likely much less than we could actually get for the property — especially because it’s on 3.5 acres, which could be subdivided into 3 lots. Developers regularly come in and tear down the old houses like ours and replace them with the maximum allowed. (At this point, though, the house has a historic property designation, which I think means that it could not be torn down unless it was abandoned and in extreme disrepair. I think the acre-ish lots on each side could probably be sold separately, with some creative surveying to define property boundaries…)

I also wonder what is going on with a neighbor’s property… he bought for 1.7 million in 2001, and the assessment is 1.1 million. This one has a lot of land but I think it’s not subdividable for some reason. It’s a nice house – very long driveway, very private, built in 1987, has a tennis court and pool.

OP is correct that prices are a bit nuts here… The very “meh” house across the street that stood empty for about 8 years and needs a lot of work sold for ~550K a few weeks ago, it is assessed at $400K. The value is in the land, but it’s only 1 acre so can’t be subdivided. I have a hard time imagining paying over half a million dollars for a tear-down, but stranger things have happened.

That’s happening in the town I live in (I do not live in the wealthiest town, I am only privileged to work there, lol). For a long time my town was not really a desirable place to live - it was kind of considered “the boonies”, not close to many amenities, a bit too far for a regular Boston commute… but now that WFH is more popular and more and more people are being priced out of immediate metro-Boston ranges, it’s becoming more desirable because people gotta live somewhere.

I just closed on a 5-unit house here June that has an assessed value of $525,000 which is a little more than we paid for it. The appraisers valued it at closer to $700k, and Zillow has it estimated at $780,000.

It’s not even that nice of a house; it’s built in the 1900s, is only on half an acre of land, and we’re already getting offers from developers for way more than we bought it for. It’s 2m from the 495/Rt 2 junction, it’s right between a lot of new residential development, and around here rent is steadily climbing north of $1,800 a month for a one bedroom apartment. The people across the street from us are renting out their one bedroom units for $1.6-2k a pop, depending on SF. We’re a bit behind the curve, we honored the previous landlord’s rent and our biggest unit (2br) is $1,100 - the rest are $650-1000. We could hike the rent up 50% tomorrow and still be within the market.

Prices are really nuts here. My parents have lived in this area for over 35 years. They have a house that is assessed at $650k on some acreage. The house is older and needs some work. They’re regularly getting developers offering nearly $1 million. I’m going to be sad when they sell, but I don’t blame them. It’s hard to walk away from that kind of offer. I imagine that the developers see it as a demo - you can fit about seven lots on their acreage.

Interesting about the composition of the BOA. I know that when I appeared before ours, it was composed of the current assessor, an assessor from another town and a third party who may or may not have been a resident but was familiar with the town. I know that when I asked specifically how a particular number appearing on the back of the card is calculated, I wasn’t able to get an answer.

As far as on-site visits go, our Assessor’s card indicated that the last on-site visit (by someone who works for the company) had been in 2012 related to a permit. When I actually had two BOA members come out and walk the house, they agreed that two entire rooms that they had on the card didn’t exist. It dropped the square footage of our house by 1000. Kind of makes me wonder what kind of site visit the company was doing.

One of the things that really chaps me is that there are categories of houses in the program that our town uses. Each category indicates a multiplier for the sum of the calculated value of a house. In my town, a house categorized as a “Cape” has a multiplier of .98. An “Old Style” has a multiplier of 1.06, an “Antique” of 1.08, a “Contemporary” of .93 and a “Mansion” of 1.20. So an 8000 sq ft house with an indoor pool that gets categorized as a Contemporary pays significantly less in property taxes than a smaller house categorized as a Mansion. (Just an example, although the multipliers are accurate.) This is irrespective and on top of the add ons for feature like fireplaces, number of rooms/ bathrooms, building materials, condition and total square footage. So never have a house called a mansion or you’ll get hosed.

With our Antique, I compared it to other antiques in town and found that we were paying the highest amount per square foot of any of them (I told you it was a 19 page appeal). The BOA told me that was irrelevant.

Let me be very clear: Mr. Frugal and I believe we should pay our fair share of taxes, both income and property. But we believe the system should be fair and objective.

Phew. I feel better now. Thanks for letting me rant.

1 Like

In your shoes, I would be frustrated too. They need to be able to give you transparent, definitive answers. That is what our tax dollars are for.

:scream: Where did they get these two rooms? Did they get it from original site plans of the house circa the BOH? That’s not okay - and is another semi-common thing I see and hear about. I’m sorry that happened to you and very glad it got fixed.

Not uncommon in MA Assessment; the reasoning being that in the current market, XYZ has a higher base value than ZYX. In my town’s market, antiques and old style homes are much more valued than contemporaries or capes too. Capes and contemporaries depreciate at a different rate than Antiques and Old Style homes. It’s all factor based, there’s a lot of math involved – which is why most towns have gone to valuation software for fewer mistakes.

The valuation software we used was Vision. One of the first things this program asks is for zoning (location) info - then house style. An 8000 square foot home on the “poor side” of town, all things equal, will be valued significantly less than the 8000 square foot home located in a desirable location. In my town I work in specific, certain streets have status appeal tied to them which drives up the valuation of the homes because they sell for more – it means a lot more to say you live in the historic district than one of the busy side roads right off of Interstate 90. House features such as a desirable style will factor into the value as well. Certain construction details have a lower or higher base value (like stucco versus vinyl siding) and those construction details tend to usually be tied into specific house styles as well.

It should be! And you should have Assessors that are transparent and open to explaining how they arrived at a valuation rather than being beat around the bush.

Thanks for giving more perspective Beowulf. I still think that House Style multiplier is a less than fair additive factor.

“An 8000 square foot home on the “poor side” of town, all things equal, will be valued significantly less than the 8000 square foot home located in a desirable location. In my town I work in specific, certain streets have status appeal tied to them which drives up the valuation of the homes because they sell for more – it means a lot more to say you live in the historic district than one of the busy side roads right off of Interstate 90. House features such as a desirable style will factor into the value as well. Certain construction details have a lower or higher base value (like stucco versus vinyl siding) and those construction details tend to usually be tied into specific house styles as well.” (From your post above.)

All of these things: location, construction materials, view shed, etc. are already factored in separately, so it seems that a reasonably nice house in a reasonably nice area gets doubled down on or a discount depending on its style.

By the way, I have no idea where the two phantom rooms came from. As far as I can tell, they never existed. Best I can come up with is the inspector looked at building permits and misunderstood them. Had he (they are all males) actually looked at the building he would have seen that they weren’t there. One was supposed to be a second story over a mud room that connected to another living space above the garage. Just not there. Moral of the story: be sure that your Assessor’s card is accurate!!!

Thanks for this thread! Fascinating reading, from someone else who’s been meaning to figure out just what on earth has been going into my tax bill lately.