I am finally, finally seriously looking at getting My Very Own Cat- after several years of stealing time with other people’s kitties because my living situation was not conducive (e.g. housemate with cat-chasing dog.) I’m a few months away from feeling like I am in Ideal Cat Space, but am starting the process of looking at breed-specific rescues, local adoption agencies, etc. to be ready when Right Cat comes along. (I may have already found Right Cat, but I can’t get him for another few weeks, at which point I sincerely hope he will have found himself his Right Home. Sigh.)
I grew up with a complete menagerie of family dogs and cats, but the only veterinarian reference I think is appropriate for me to give is the horse vet. The vet for the family critters does know me as a representative of my family; the horse vet can speak to how I take care of my actual existing critter.
In your experience with various rescues and shelters, is it an item of concern if the veterinary reference does not habitually treat the animal in question, provided that the potential adoptee also lists “and this is the name and number of the veterinarian I am planning to use for not-horse”?
I would think that not everyone can provide a vet reference in the first place, so this shouldn’t be a problem, but the recent thread on stringent rescue requirements prompted the question. (So did my family’s experience adopting an animal through a rescue, vs. keeping the known-to-have-no-home stray dog who stole my dad’s candy bar out of his hand and then took it into his SUV to eat. We’d had dogs for 20+ years and a list of references as big as the backyard, but because we trained the dogs to an Invisible Fence to perimeter said big backyard- because the Husky would jump a fence that could keep a jumper stud in, and the Pyr would go right under it- we were an unsuitable home. And other stories.)