[QUOTE=CupOJavaa;8694266]
I very much appreciate your input on Default and Innkeeper. If you don’t mind, what makes you value Innkeeer as a stud more so than Default? [/QUOTE]
If your goal is a TB sporthose, the two stallions aren’t even in the same stratosphere IMO.
Default only has 4 registered TB foals. Four. I saw 2 of them years ago. I don’t know if maybe he’s been used for outcrosses or if his people just chose not to register his foals, but the horse has been at stud a loooong time and appears to have little to show for it. To my knowledge, Default has never been presented to any inspection and has not done any under saddle competition apart from his racing career. If he has, it has not been made public.
I saw Innkeeper quite a bit in the early to mid 2000s, watched him go through his RPSI inspection, and watched several of his foals showing in hand and at inspections. Innkeeper is the whole package for a stallion. Big, correct, athletic, fabulous temperament, etc. Hilltop Farm recognized it, accepted him as part of their guest stallion program, and bred some of their own mares to him; if anyone can separate the sh*t from the shinola when it comes to sporthorse potential, it’s them. Innkeeper has evented himself, albeit at the local level. He has also hunted, was shown in hunters and dressage, etc. all while ridden by amateurs. When looking for a sport horse stallion, I just think it’s nice to know they can actually do the sport.
Of course, this is all just my two cents. And I’m also incredibly biased having dealt with one stallion more than the other.
ETA: I found this article from 2013 which says Innkeeper, at the time, was only available AI. That may (or may not) be a deal breaker for you.