[QUOTE=TB or not TB?;3083535]
First, who peed in your cornflakes? :eek::eek::eek: Never did I say that eventing hasn’t changed or improved over the years, and honestly, I don’t understand why this thread offends you so much.
The facts actually aren’t that easy to find, contrary to popular belief. FEI statistics only cover events at * level or above, and not all FEI sanctioned events even report their statistics back to the FEI, so there are holes in their data as it is.
Furthermore, while many accidents are investigated on a case-by-case basis, there are almost no studies that look at overriding trends in rider deaths. The rotational fall is a pretty basic element that has been identified, but there are so many more similarities that it’s mind boggling that no one has identified them before.
And here’s what I plan to do about it: use the scientific process to actually STUDY accidents and identify factors and trends that contribute. Once these are identified, I plan to create a multi-pronged approach on how to counteract some of those common factors. For instance, everyone focuses on how to prevent rotational falls; while this is admirable, I intend to look at why rotational falls are statistically more fatal now than they used to be (according to the FEI’s 2006 safety report). As has been identified, the speed at which jumps is approached is often a contributing factor. I intend to calculate the physics equation that will tell us exactly what range of speeds are lethal in a rotational fall.
The final step will be creating a presentation for the USEA, USEF, and FEI, as well as publishing the findings of the experiment in notable eventing related media.
Oh, and here’s why I need COTHers - because as has already been pointed out, not all the deaths are reported to the FEI and many studies use ONLY their statistics as data. When I have the deceased’s name, I can find out what happened to him or her. Many of the names mentioned on this thread were not looked at by the FEI. So yeah, I think I WILL continue to utilize this forum, but thanks for your concern.
Oh, and as a last note, unlike notable members of the “Safety Committee,” I don’t have a dog in this fight. An impartial observer is a must in true science.[/QUOTE]
Additionally, there are no reported statistics for the injuries. That category could be limited to career ending. It seems that it would skew things a bit to report all injuries, unless there is a scale for types/recovery length or something to distinguish it from the garden variety type of injury that will heal quickly and is non career ending for horse and rider. Both have to be taken into account. Issues with horse injuries could be used as a red flag marker before it involved the rider if you understand my meaning.
I also think that anytime someone thinks they can no longer ask questions or a discussion/investigation is squelched or foreshortened so as to only collect superficial data, that the needed changes will never come. Everyone should be open to the full scope of the story, from the nagging doubts of the rider who subsequently fell or was injured, to the conditioning programs. If the intent is not to allow full disclosure then surely something is not being addressed. Hence the need for this kind of discussion as sad as it may become to some. Look at it from the standpoint of saving your loved ones and yourself from unnecessary harm. This is a very appropriate and well needed discourse. Thank you to the OP for opening up “the can of worms”.