[QUOTE=Bristol Bay;7613281]
If the Triple Crown is indeed a media construct, it’s a popular one. Everyone agrees it would be good for the sport if more horses won it. So why not make it a series of races as Many have suggested?
In other sports, rules are changed all the time to avoid injuries or to increase scoring. Hockey changed the rules so there can only be one player defending the area in front of the net. More goals are scored as a result. Basketball had already made a similar adjustment. Baseball lowered the mound and widened the strike zone. All of these tweaks were to make the games more fan-friendly, as my husband put it.
So, okay, people are hungry for a Triple Crown horse. Make it fair so a good horse has a better chance.
Racing history and tradition haven’t kept tracks from closing.[/QUOTE]
It doesn’t need to be changed.
The English Triple Crown hasn’t been won in 44 years. Racing still thrives in the British Isles.
You don’t need more TC winners to appreciate racing. It is what it is. Love it for what it is.
Those changes in other sports, like defender in hockey, backpass in soccer, etc, were changed to address negative aspects of the game that had crept in and had changed those games as a spectacle. They don’t make it easier to win the Stanley Cup or the World Cup or the Champions League. So those are bad analogies.