[QUOTE=SnicklefritzG;8257138]
What makes you say it is weak? Not trying to argue, just curious.
If it was really that bad then how did he end up winning the Triple Crown?[/QUOTE]
Pretty much what Springboro said-- for consignment purposes, horses are evaluated on their “catalog page” which gives information on their sire and the first few dams. The belief is that good performing and good producing dams are the most likely to produce good runners, but of course, there are exceptions to everything.
Littleprincessemma was unplaced in her brief racing career, and by a very average sire. American Pharoah is one of her first foals, so it will be interesting to see if her foals continue to WAY outperform expectations.
The second dam, Exclusive Rosette, has some accolades that look better on paper than they actually were: she has stakes a win, in restricted company, in her only stakes appearance. She has performance in allowance races, but at lower tier tracks for very small purses. If her connections had chosen to run her on a more competitive circuit, she would have been outclassed in the claiming ranks. She did outproduce herself with some nice stakes horses, but nothing that would suggest the next Triple Crown winner was coming from her family! She was also by far the best offspring of the third dam, Zetta Jet, who was another non-winner on the track.
I’m not knocking his breeding at all. I’m just saying that on paper, it is nothing spectacular that would suggest TRIPLE CROWN WINNER. But horses can’t read their pedigrees and love to prove even the most knowledgeable of breeders wrong. From what I understand, it was readily apparent that he was something special early on. And now his dam has gone from looking quite average on paper to looking like a rockstar on paper. 