<BLOCKQUOTE class=“ip-ubbcode-quote”><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by BlueGooPonyShampoo:
I find it interesting that men are more proportionally represented at the top levels of the sport than at the local levels. Someone explained it to me thus: this is a man’s sport if you consider the physical attributes that contruibute to success (i.e. upper body strength). There may not be as many men in the “up-and-coming” ranks but those that are tend to rise to the top faster than a lot of women because they are simply stronger where it counts. Do y’all by that?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Nope, don’t buy that. If success was solely, even mostly, dependent on brute upper body strength, perhaps I’d agree with your friend’s conclusion. However, there are too many riders of varying body types, strengths, weights, of both gender, to attribute success to upper body strength. Don’t have to wonder who’d win an arm wrestling match between Leslie McNaught and Rodrigo Pessoa; but pit them against each other in a jump off, my money’s on Rodrigo.
I do agree though that the few men in the sport do tend to rise to the top more quickly than women. Why that should be the case, I don’t really know. It’s most likely a combination of the physical, social, emotional and financial. Perhaps because men don’t suffer as we do from distractions like uncomfortable thongs.
Canter, thank you for noting that there are greater life skills than the mere ability to part a damn sea. Marriage is such a constantly blissful, peaceful and equitable state that I do feel the need to infect all with the marriage virus