[QUOTE=hurleycane;6488301]
Just curious here - Has anyone looked up the participants in that class to see if any are violators on HPA??? And to my eye - the “winner” is off. You see it in the off nod. Poor horse. Love the way the guy wallops him in the flanks to come into the line up. Great horsemanship no??? Splendid show no??? The sorry horse deserved the snatching and kicking I am sure.
Hey!!! Tell me something… what is to stop us from putting little foals under saddle… or maybe yearlings??? It would be a blast!!! And hey - if they break down - well we will just breed us some more right?? fun fun fun.
We don’t need no rules.[/QUOTE]
I think the point some are missing is not that “we don’t need rules”, but that we don’t need animal rights extremists making the rules.
Blanket statements of “well, lets ban riding two year olds” are the absurd proposals that will come from that and are not going to help what is wrong here.:no:
By the same idea of just banning riding two year olds, I would say just ban TWH and you will also eliminate what is wrong in TWH showing.
Right, senseless, throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
Lets just ban all we don’t like.
For me, no more pads/stacks, or grotesque odd gaited horses, no NASCAR, no commercial sports like football and basketball, golf and tennis and while I am God for a day, no more drought also.:rolleyes:
Seriously, keep making the rules that help curb abuses and make them strong enough to throw the abusers in a dungeon.
Letting animal rights extremist groups, with their agendas to eliminate all animal uses, make rules like not riding two year olds in general, rules that will affect so many others than the ones here, when riding two year olds is not the problem anyway?
Senseless.:no: