[QUOTE=WalkInTheWoods;6485683]
Banning working 2 yr olds of any breed that strenuously doesnt bother me a bit. I have always thought it was wrong. I have to admit i rode my horse as a 2 yr old about 15 times for under a half hour each time. That was eight years ago. I dont think i hurt him - we mostly just walked in the woods. He gaited a tiny bit and cantered slowly up a couple hills but just walked 98% of the time.
But the honing a 2 yr old goes thru to get them ready for the ring or the race track is a bit much. It all depends on how heavy a rider is and if the horse is ridden into the dirt.
If i had it to do over, i may still have ridden him lightly at that age.
But the breeders who want to break them young, work them hard, get them showing or racing just to peddle them often are not the ones who have to deal with the problems that develop. Nor do they seem to care. JMO[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=walknsound;6485842]Today’s Chattanoogan:
Horrible Court Outcomes For John Mays - Cruelty To Horses - And Richard Batson - Foster Child Rape
Tuesday, August 07, 2012
One gets off writing a newspaper article about soring? The other gets probation? No wonder the world is so messed up.
Those horse abuse videos make me ill and I cannot imagine such torture. A 16-year-old child preyed upon by her foster parent and coerced into a threesome with a neighbor? How much more deviant and sordid does it have to be?
Child abusers and animal abusers are the lowest life form on the planet, and should not be unleashed upon society. The law bungled these two sentences to the max. Unbelievable. Horrible.
Veronica Madaris[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=katarine;6485433]and the riding of two year olds under saddle.
if you like horse racing, or any number of breed shows or competitions or breed evaluations…(including showing and evaluating 3 YOs under saddle)…fair warning.[/QUOTE]
The HSUS, remember, is nor for the animals themselves, but trying to eliminate all uses of animals, one at the time.
They don’t want resolutions, they want the controversies and exposing the abuses to get the general public to see owning animals as unsavory and cruel by all and any that own them.
They are slowly making second citizens of anyone having anything to do with animals, that is their goal.
We need to be careful who we align with, as their goals may not always be ours in VERY important ways.:no:
As for riding two year olds, most anyone can tell you that a blanket statement against that is absurd, too many studies and any old timer can tell you that horses started early in their path to be whatever they will be when adults are better at it and stay more sound mentally and physically than those started later.
You would not keep kids by themselves playing unsupervised and not taught anything until they are in their late teens and mature?
You would expect any animal, including humans and horses, to learn about the world around them and what their lives will be from the time they are able to.
I think what some don’t want is any abuses while that handling and riding is happening.
I have handled too many horses over their lifetime and can definitely say those started very early and properly lived sound and heathy lives, just as good and probably better suited for their lives than those started later.
I have right now a 15 year old, started as a four year old in a ranch, that still has his moments, is watchy and will only trust the world around him so far, something you don’t find in horses started very early and right, that consider the world their oyster.
He is also not as soft and athletic as a horse started younger, just as a gymnast or basket ball player that starts training in his late teens/early twenties would not be competitive with one that started learning the right motor memory and game plan when a kid.
Always remember, whatever you do with horses, it is not when you do it, but HOW you do it that will make what you do right, or wrong.
That 15 year old had a late start in life, but if he had been handled right, knowing that he was behind already, he would not still at 15 and, being fairly bombproof otherwise, still have his bad, scared of the world moments and less than graceful performances.
He is harder on his body because doing what he does was not taught to him well and early, but manhandled into doing it without those important years of the right preparation for it, that he is finally learning now.
When we hear any statement, like “starting two year olds is too early”, we really owe it to our horses to study this carefully and listen to all sides, consider that there is so much more out there than a blanket statement can determine is right or wrong, because “it depends” comes into play.
I do think it is shameful that the abusers are not being hung up to dry, put in jail for a while, fined out of their pants.
I am not sure it is because we need more laws and regulations, or because the ones enforcing them are lacking.
I definitely will say, be careful what more rules and regulations we ask for and where those ideas come from, because not all playing this game are quite honest with what they want out of this::eek:
HSUS Criticized For Minimal Donations To Pet Shelters
Aug. 8, 2012 2:40am by Amanda Radke in BEEF Daily
RSS
EMAIL
INSHARE
COMMENTS 0
Full-page ad blasts the Humane Society of the U.S. (HSUS) for paltry donations to America’s pet shelters.
If you want to line your pockets, go work for the Humane Society of the U.S. (HSUS). But, if you want to help animals, you might want to seek work elsewhere. A watchdog group, Humane Watch, recently released a full-page ad in USA Today blasting HSUS for its minimal effort to support hands-on pet shelters.
HumaneWatch, a project of the nonprofit Center for Consumer Freedom, used the advertisement to warn Americans that only a tiny fraction of their contributions to HSUS actually goes to pet shelters.
With a multi-million-dollar budget, less than 1% of it actually goes to helping animal shelters. In my home state of South Dakota, for example, only $15,000 was given to help local shelters, leaving many, including one shelter in Sioux Falls, our largest city, barely able to scrape together enough money to keep its doors open.
“Despite most Americans’ belief to the contrary, HSUS is not a national umbrella group that represents community-based humane societies, and it shares just 1% of its income with underfunded pet shelters at the local level,” says Humane Watch.
“The ad features a statement from HSUS President Wayne Pacelle: ‘We never said we funded animal shelters.’ Yet the animal rights group continues to largely rely on the images of sad-looking cats and dogs to tug at the heartstrings and, most importantly, to HSUS, the wallets of America’s pet lovers. The ad goes on to explain where HSUS’s money is going: Millions into its executive pension fund, $32 million stuffed in hedge funds, and for its defense against charges of corruption in federal court.
“A new HumaneWatch study finds HSUS’s direct mail, telemarketing, and television appeals actively perpetuate the misperception that HSUS’s primary focus is to care for abandoned and abused cats and dogs. However, HSUS doesn’t run a single pet shelter and local shelters aren’t seeing much of HSUS’s donations, with several local organizations across America going so far as to change their names in order to prevent donor confusion.”
Do you think most Americans are aware of how HSUS uses its money? How many people do you know who have unknowingly donated to HSUS because they want to help animals?
By the way, if you are in Fayetteville, AR, on Aug. 9, join me at a University of Arkansas symposium sponsored by the Center for Food Animal Wellbeing, for a discussion on food animal welfare. I will be one of the speakers featured at the symposium, and I would love to visit with you at the event."—