[QUOTE=Rbow;6357982]
In this case, I think the lack of regulation is more empowering to the animal rights movement. Even without soring/stewarding, the Big Lick is an effective recruiting tool for AR activism. This 50-year old mess is a gold mine.[/QUOTE]
Not really. This will be pushed off the front page by some other outrage in some other equine discipline. That has been the history for the past 50 years and will likely be so in the future. If anything the “hot news life cycle” decreases with each new technology. The Industry knows this and is just “hunkered down” for the time being.
And HSUS will just pocket the extra funds raised and look for another issue to back. Not that this one will “go away,” but will just drop back in priority.
Further, the real action is in Nashville, not New York or DC. If you want to push our oft-times redneck legislature into non-action (or worse, into re-action) just push hard from the Left or Right Coast. If you wish to suceed at the State level then you’ll have to deal with the people that are in place.
This statute does give some new tools to the prosecution to address serious issues. Note that the legislation also forbids dragging an animal behind a vehicle. That was the genesis of this proposal. It stemmed from a case in McMinn Co. last year.
I live in a county where an overzealous ACO made an inappropriate siezure of dairy cattle. I was personally involved in the matter. The county got sued for a Federal Civil Rights violation and ended up paying $300,000 to the owners in compensation. This also resulted in a change in State law requiring a pre-investigation by a person with specific knowledge of livestock care before a herd can be siezed. The risk of “animal rights activism” is quite real.
You don’t note where you live. If you’re a TN resident then your concerns should be addressed to your state sen. or rep. If you don’t live in TN then you can make your feelings known to any state authority you wish. How seriously you will be taken is unknown.
G.