JB… your #1 fan is baaaaack…:no:
2 Likes
Also adding: What you read and quoted was the abstract. Also not the same as the conclusion. It is shocking that people do not know this.
1 Like
Definitely not a fan.
1 Like
More like a vendetta :lol:
1 Like
How about basic comprehension? What was quoted was the abstract. The conclusion is a very different part of the paper. Did you read either of them? Amazing that you do not know this.
1 Like
https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/abstract
"An abstract summarizes, usually in one paragraph of 300 words or less, the major aspects of the entire paper in a prescribed sequence that includes: 1) the overall purpose of the study and the research problem(s) you investigated; 2) the basic design of the study; 3) major findings or trends found as a result of your analysis; and, 4) a brief summary of your interpretations and conclusions."
https://writing.wisc.edu/handbook/as…esearch-paper/
"SAMPLE ABSTRACT 4, A STRUCTURED ABSTRACT
…
…
…
CONCLUSIONS"
https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/abstracts/
"An abstract is a self-contained, short, and powerful statement that describes a larger work. Components vary according to discipline. An abstract of a social science or scientific work may contain the scope, purpose, results, and contents of the work. An abstract of a humanities work may contain the thesis, background, and conclusion of the larger work.
Not to mention, the part she quoted said “in conclusion…” Did you read what she quoted?
It’s amazing what I’m at least pretty sure I know to be true and then can prove to be true
6 Likes
@Fellbutbackup you’re that bored, huh? Just HAD to come back here and tell us all how stupid we are?
PS: still waiting for any actual data to back up your claims.
9 Likes
There will be none. This isn’t about the topic. This is weirdly personal. It would be funny if it weren’t so pathetic.
4 Likes
From the full paper:
“In conclusion, this study showed no apparent adverse effects of feeding a fat-supplemented diet for 16 months nor any apparent disadvantages of supplementing with a predominantly saturated vegetable oil rather than the more typically fed predominantly unsaturated oil.”
Sound familiar?
And, if you have bothered to read the original full text, you may have noticed that it does not contain a separate “Conclusion”, but ends with the above quoted sentence in the “Discussion”.
15 Likes
Does Troll Bingo have a box for stalking?
5 Likes
:yes::yes::yes::yes:
extra points for deleting posts, changing the title of a thread, or resurrecting said thread that’s been quiet for a while to take another swipe at someone who has been nothing but helpful. Or maybe it just calls for a shot or three…
11 Likes
I’m not reading the whole thing, I’ve had enough of every kind of entertainment reading the first couple and last page, but has anyone put down “No gallbladder” yet. That’s the one folks who think they know things about equine digestion love to bandy about.
“They can’t digest it!!! They have no gallbladder!!! :o !!!”
Signed,
FatFeeder
(Been feeding oil in quantity for pushing 20 years now and the only fat I didn’t like was prilled because it came out the other end as tiny diamonds that sparkled in the sunlight. Fats prilled for cattle are not as easily digestible as liquid fats in MY experience)
posts 57, 67, 69 talk about the gall bladder 
2 Likes
