OK, I’ll bite again. . .Maybe if the hunters were allowed to use the same devices (and it was customary and usual to) as the dressage, etc., then maybe some wouldn’t feel the need for ear poms. Hunters are not judged on “submission” (I hate that word). They are allowed some freedom to have that relaxed and huntery look. The horse I show in the hunters has PLENTY of mileage AND training. He’s done the QH stuff, jumpers, hunters, equitation, you name it. But he’s still a horse, bottom line. If using ear poms can eliminate one injury due to an unpredictable spook, you’d condemn their use??? I’m sorry. . .I just don’t understand your attitude on this issue, or what should be an non-issue, IMO.
I’m not attacking anyone - just trying to clarify my opinion. I just didn’t realize the sensitivity on this, obviously.
OK - I just read my post and I apologize for the tone in the beginning - definately defensive. I have to say, that I love watching dressage done well (you can go to my posts on the Dressage Forum to see that). I sure advanced level dressage riders use different tack/applicances because of the level of intricacy their movements require. Some of the training, IMO, is the same across the board in the different disciplines and I think that is a good thing. By the same token, the training takes different turns by necessity for the different disciplines. What I’m trying to say, and obviously not doing a very good job, is that different disciplines require different training techniques. I’m not condoning all of them, needless to say. But I’m sure that some are needed that are unique to each discipline.
Ok, I’m stopping now - don’t know if I’m helping or hurting here
[This message has been edited by Duffy (edited 04-17-2000).]