The droopy or V-shaped browband trend - flattering or not?

My first encounter with non-leg-based yardage measurement was A hotel course years back. Each cart had a monitor depicting the cart place on the hole and its distance in the flag, and my buddies and I concurred the system created our shot-planning more precise. Then, a couple holes into the circular, our carts ended up side-by-side, and someone noticed that the readings over the two screens differed by a dozen yards. That raised questions not only about the condition of the technology but also how much precision our shot-planning really needed.

Since That Time, digital yardage measurement is now, if not Necessarily more necessary, at least more prevalent. Now it can even be lawful under the Rules of Golf (in case a local rule is enactedsee the rule book). As with most modern doodads, nevertheless, there’s absolutely no single-best selection for all users.

https://www.plurk.com/BestGolfRangeFinder

The primary decision nowadays is involving laser-based apparatus, which Measure distance with a infrared ray, and GPS devices, that track data from the Department of Defense’s Global Positioning System. For anybody who was a child in the’60s, the option seems too good to be true: pocket column gun or outer-space communicator? Perhaps inevitably, every system’s fans tend to scorn the other, like PC versus Mac owners. As a representative of one company told me,“You’re either a laser guy or a GPS man”

A laser range finder is straightforward. You aim it in a Flag, a danger stake, the lip of a fairway bunker, or the back end of the dawdling fat guy from the group beforehand; press on a button; read your number; select exactly the ideal club; and make your normal, crummy swing. A number of the better models (generally $250$400) have minimal ranges of a thousand yards or more. That might seem like overkill to anybody who does not hit the ball six-tenths of a mile, but the premium devices tend to be better at picking up shorter targets, also, also, in my estimation, are worth the extra $50 or $100. (Avoid any laser using a"slope" or"incline/decline" feature, however; it’s against the rules, even if the device has the term"tour" in its own name or on its own package.)

GPS units are more varied. Most popular models also allow you to do Things like keeping score for your foursome, tracking your club selection, and measuring your own drives (you don’t wish to know). This past fall, I used a Callaway uPro (now deeply discounted to about $200). It let me start each hole with a TV-style flyover and gave me the option of seeing my yardages on aerial photographs. Some apparatus from market leader SkyCaddie (roughly $150 to $400) have a clever feature which allows you to move the flag round the green and can track the clubs you hit from various yardagesalthough, as is obviously the case with GPS, there’s still guesswork included. Additionally, I turned my Android smartphone into a passable GPS apparatus, by downloading the most favorite programs GolfCard ($10.99) and SkyDroid ($1.99).

how to choose the best golf range finder

Each technology has advantages and disadvantages. Any laser is More precise than any GPSwhich has a margin of error of several yardsbut it can not see through solid obstacles, such as that barn you just sliced your drive behind. GPS devices are normally cheaper, but most need continuing investments, possibly in annual fees or class downloads. They also demand varying amounts of setup. A laser, unlike a GPS, takes a fairly stable hand, but it allows you to shoot whatever you are able to see, including goals on a range. Flagsticks on some classes have small mirrors, which can make them easier to hit from farther away. A GPS can warn you about concealed hazards, but tracking satellites is brutal on batteries, particularly a cellphone’s.

Preferences divide over the handicap scale: Better gamers favor lasers. I find yardage helps me the most interior 150 yards using the flag In viewand for those shots that a laser is obviously exceptional. But I’ve got a foot in The other camp, too, because, in addition to my own Bushnell PinSeeker 1500 (no Longer made), I have a new Garmin Approach S1 Golf GPS wristwatch, Which is useful not only in providing ballpark yardages at a glance but also in Beginning conversations.

Read more

Looks would be a personal subjective thing. What they do do, is give the bridle crown more room behind the ears. I find even the longest straight browbands tend to pull the crown right up tight against the ears. The shaped ones tend to let it sit a little back… and not so snug. So from a comfort point of view, I would think they would be more comfortable for the horse.

4 Likes

I think they look best on a horse with a wider forehead. Personally I like the U shape over the V. If I had a horse like you describe (pretty but plain, wide forehead) I would probably go for the U shape with some bling - like a single row of stones or crystals. Keep in mind that highlighting the forehead with bling will call attention to any unsteadiness in the head.

Of course pictures of the mare in question would help. :wink:

1 Like

I, personally, do not like the V shape at all. I think it is unflattering on all horses. But, in the end, it makes little difference. I think people should have fun the way they want to, and dress their horses the way they want to.

5 Likes

Agree with most of the foregoing. I started out hating them (I tend to be old school like you, Victor) but they grew on me. I realized that it just depends on the head of the horse. I know someone who has an Arab gelding that she competes in dressage and frankly, I think the V browband on his tiny, chiseled head looks kinda silly. On my 17.1 Swedish gelding, the U shaped browband on him looks spectacular. Again, just depends on the horse. I am like a crow though, in that I adore sparklies! Give me bling, baby!

1 Like

Also agree with everyone else so far.
Personally, I like the U, not the V.
But to each their own; they’re all legal, use what makes you happy.
And I definitely notice a different in my mare’s comfort with a U vs straight.

2 Likes

I think they look better on big heads…

1 Like

I like the V but not the droopy ones. but all mine are straight, some with bling.

1 Like

I love them - I think they are flattering on most head shapes

I’m not a super-huge fan of the aesthetics, particularly if there’s a LOT of bling. They start reminding me of some of the stuff one sees in some Western show rings, particularly the V’s. Nothing inherently WRONG with it, but looks odd in a dressage ring to me. I also think a lot of them look like they just plain don’t fit, like the user grabbed a part from a larger-sized bridle and put it on the headstall. Gives a real “dressing up in mommy’s clothes” or “droopy drawers” sort of vibe to me, particularly the curved ones if the way the band hangs is such that it rotates and the top edge is not in contact with the face and the bottom edge is. I’m not exactly on the cutting edge of fashion, in or out of the show ring, though, so my opinion is probably not worth much!

1 Like

Personal opinion-

I think the “droopy U” only works on large, wide heads. I think it makes the bridle look poorly fitting and sloppy on smaller or averaged-sized heads.

To me, it seems like the “V” shape works on a greater variety of head sizes. But you can still overdo it with too pronounced of a “V” for the horse’s head. When that happens, it’s distracting to a fault.

My favorite “non-traditional” shapes are the ones that are very slight and almost a combination between the U and the V. The start off sharply in a V shape, but flatten out at the bottom of the V so there is not a sharp point.

I love the “droopy U” for my horse, here’s why: He has a wide forehead that tapers down to a delicate muzzle (he’s a Westfalen). He has a gorgeous head. That said, most straight browbands are a tad too tight and constrict the bridle. Unfortunately, my favorite stone and subtle bling browband that I showed my previous horse in is a tad too small. The thin, U shaped browband fits him well and contours to his head - It doesn’t look very U shaped. Thus, it was a functional choice for me.

I bought a couple at Indoor Brabant a few years ago and I was one of those people buying a blingy browband with a picture of my horse on my phone asking others what they thought! (It was really fun!) One woman said “He’s a nice looking gelding, but a gelding. PLEASE don’t get white diamond bling for a gelding. PLEASE”. I laughed and she was right. I got a grey bling browband and one that has small crystals that make up black and white squares.

I attached a pic of my horse’s head and a pic of him wearing the U shaped bridle. It doesn’t look very U shaped on him. I don’t have better pictures on my computer.

TP posing.jpg

Fior trail.jpg

I didn’t like most of the shaped ones at all…notice past tense. I ordered a bridle with a U shaped one. I didn’t keep the bridle as the noseband was too small but damn, that U blingy thing looked quite nice on my fairly refined mare’s head.
So, I have to change my mind a bit. As said above…they need to fit well. I don’t like them flopping around or dangling down between their eyes.

Susan

I love the U shape on my very, very broad and extremely “pony” Welsh Cob’s head. It definitely improves her bridle fit as well.

I really like the U shape, personally. My Oldenburg gelding has a wider forehead, more delicate nearer his mouth. No white markings — I think the U fits well.

fullsizeoutput_1a7a.jpeg

Barf. That’s what I think every time i see one. Sloppy. unkempt. Poorly fitting. Pretentious. Meant to satisfy something in the rider, no matter how bad it looks. Sorry but not really, that’s what I think of droopy, v shaped browbands.

5 Likes

Two words that definitely oppose one another: droopy and dressage. :slight_smile:

For the most part, my horse’s forehead is so wide that most straight browbands can look poorly fitting even if they’re long enough. I have him in a very shallow V and it looks very polished because it lies flat against his head.

It’s something that’s completely subjective to the individual. You’ll find people who hate one shape on one horse, and someone who will love it on the same horse. I make them (blinged U, V and straight), and personally really like U shape. This is what I’ve found and is my preference of what looks good/not so good:

Looks good in U: Warmbloods, bigger classic heads, standardbreds, lighter draft crosses, “handsome” heads
Not so good in U: Refined “pretty” heads, arabs, slight TBs, distracts from their subtle features

Looks good in V: Baroque breeds, marking free faces
Not so good in V: Stock horses

Looks good in straight: Most horses, particularly TB, stock horses, fine featured horses, interestingly marked horses
Not so good in straight: Plain or heavy heads, I find straight doesn’t help them look any less plain or heavy where U or V can help add some shape

3 Likes

I like a MODEST amount of drape, I don’t like any of the V’s - the shape is too harsh IMO. Bling should be modest, too.

this poor bub looks embarrassed, it’s too big, too blingy.
https://www.ponycouture.co.uk/bling-browbands-customers-photos/parker-in-his-bling-browband-by-ponycouture/

MUCH more flattering look
https://www.totally-tack.co.uk/p_1683_gfs-patent-rolled-leather-weymouth-double-bridle-black

1 Like