This article has me feeling very conflicted.
While I am thrilled there are people that are advocating for animals and saving them from horrible fates, I wonder if there can be repercussions that we don’t anticipate.
Not all “bitey” dogs need to be PTS, I think we can all agree. And I think even in most of the worst scenarios, it is the people - not the animals - at fault.
That seems to be what he is arguing…and on some level I agree. As a horse person there is a lot I forgive that I ascribe to prey animal behavior (or similar).
But he extrapolates that to a concerning degree.
Whether we have dogs, cats or horses, shouldn’t we assume they should act accordingly? Yes and no? I am not sure. That said, I think this line of thinking opens a lot of doors… doors I am not so comfortable with.
I think there have to be limits… but what then? Also, animal litigation is bound to find us too…
What think you, COTH?