[QUOTE=wendy;7315025]
actually that isn’t true. Many of the so-called prescription diets have undergone remarkably little testing. For example, the diet to prevent bladder stones? it has NEVER undergone a long-term study to prove clinically that it actually does prevent bladder stones.
And the renal diets- there are studies out there showing they actually take years off the animals lives vs. other kinds of diets.
and there’s a really interesting review article by Hills himself talking about the results of many years of his research on diets- and if you look at what he says, and the composition of the diets sold by Science Diet, there are many severe discrepancies.
as to Blue Buffalo- I’ve never been impressed with their line. They don’t seem to have any consistent philosophy/plan about feeding and just produce various products willy-nilly in an apparent attempt to attract consumers.[/QUOTE]
There is a TON of research out there on these diets. These companies constantly sue eachother to prove claims they are making and when they go to court they have to either provide the research or pay the company that sued them. My husband has worked in the Research and Development Department of a major pet food company for almost 14 years. The competition between companies is insane and a whole lot goes on behind the curtain!
It actually makes me feel a whole lot better about pet food than I did before I met him.
As for the renal diets - there is a reason they diets are called prescription or veterinary diets. They are not intended for long term use. They are intended to help with an acute problem that needs to be addressed in as many ways as possible. As horse people we generally understand that. Our horse has something medical going on and we put them on a supplement - similar concept. The renal diet is not intended for a pet that has years left. Cats in particular are a difficult one once they go into renal failure. You are trying to pack as many calories into the cat as possible with a little protein as possible, all the while understanding that a cat requires a LOT of protein in their diet.
Does it surprise me at all that what Hills said conflicts with his own research? No. Does that mean the research is invalid? No. Many people in his position have so little hands on work in their company anymore they have an idealized view of what goes on, and have their own concepts in their head that people within their company aren’t always able to correct. Think about it this way - does the president/CEO of the company you work for REALLY understand what’s going on in the workplace?
I COMPLETELY agree that BB has too many ingredients in it - It almost feels like they tried to put everything in there that someone said is supposed to be good for a pet! LOL