That’s definitely the problem: there’s just no money in it (breeding for eventing). And I am not sure that that is going to change anytime soon since I get the feeling that your rank-and-file eventers take great pride in making “something” from what was basically “nothing.” The diamond-in-the-rough syndrome is actually what is most sought after when it comes to unproven horses–among the average riders, that is. The ones with major aspirations, I suspect, do show interest in some youngsters that have some breeding to back them up–but it also has to have type and stride and they still want something going u/s, not a baby.
So few (in any sport) have the time to wait and there are soooo many variables between breeding and performance, even more so for a “multi-dimensional” sport like eventing.
As a typical example: I have a full sister to Connor going right now, and I have her priced as a hunter pony (she’s top of the line, etc., etc.). Karen said there were lots of people interested in her in Florida (where I put up posters), but I just know none would pay what I want for her and what I could get, probably fairly quickly, if I sent her to a hunter barn (she’s doing courses, fancy, no changes yet though–but inclined to do them, etc.).
And so I’ve actually decided not to bring her to Karen to get her sold, but rather just to get Karen to ride her a few times–just to see if, if, if things go well enough for me to afford it, I might keep her to prove that Con isn’t the “freak” everyone calls him! (Really important if you believe in your breeding program, wouldn’t you say–and an interesting dilemma, don’t you think?)
Edited to add: And as I think about it, maybe that’s why there are so few (no, not “none,” but definitely a lot fewer) known “relatives” that compete in eventing. One relative doesn’t really sell another (or help it follow the same path). In dressage and hunter-jumpers, that certainly helps (and helps breeders, too!), but the skepticism in eventing, I think, really shuts those possibilities down sometimes.