What took my breath away was the cops didn’t tell the prosecutor the level of fear at that property and the comment made after the shooting by one of the cops in the lounge that they “knew something like that was going to happen” or words to that effect.
Actually, I’m surprised Lauren Kanarek didn’t sue the entire Township for allowing this to happen to her.
Did you gloss over the fact it was LAUREN and ROB who called the inspectors to come out? How interesting the entire county came riding to the rescue when the pretty blonde called (sarcasm).
All the ugliness in that brief and you’re still hung up on occupancy. Got it.
Why did LAUREN call the inspectors if not to harass?
WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP proceeded to invade the premises in response to a
complaint Kanarek and Goodwin made to WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP that the buildings on the
Farm had unpermitted renovations, alterations, and/or construction work being performed and/or
performed in the past.
“64. When the responding DEFENDANT POLICE OFFICER finally made it up to the
barn where BARISONE, Gray, and the other peaceful visitors/residence had congregated, the
DEFENDANT POLICE OFFICER were presented with the minor who Goodwin had assaulted.
65. Speaking through a torrent of tears, the minor told the responding DEFENDANT
POLICE OFFICERS how Goodwin had threatened her physically and placed her in fear for “in
fear for her life”; whereupon the DEFENDANT POLICE OFFICES asked the minor “Did he
[Goodwin] threaten to kill you?”
66. Upon hearing the minor’s response, which was “no,” the DEFENDANT POLICE
OFFICERS turned away from her, stopped listening to her legitimate report of fear and threats,
and failed to give the minor or her complaint any further audience or meaningful consideration.”
A tall burly adult man physically threatening a minor and the cops waved it off. In 2019.
Makes it all the more suspicious that the video cameras were not recording at the time of the shooting….and there was only 1 audio recorder at her locker. The assertion in this civil case that these devices were in their private spaces seems to go along with LK’s assertion of having pictures of things going on in the kids bedrooms.
Surveillance in a locker speaks to covert usage aimed with the intent to gather information to use against someone later on. It speaks to pre-meditated courses of action in order to attain a certain desired effect. If used in conjunction with another person, then the charge of Conspiracy is appropriate.
A recording device does not protect property so a defensive assertion wouldn’t stand a validity test. Using a big ole lock to protect property would.
If surveillance and recording is used to gain financial leverage from another or coerce or blackmail them in conjunction with other parties it May have elements applicable to RICO standards, depending on that state. Is there a continuing pattern of behavior?
Not saying it is applicable here. Just saying this exists.
SafeSport isn’t going to do anything. There have been umpteen reports filed regarding this woman and nothing is done. Lauren has NEVER been held accountable for ANYTHING and she won’t be in this situation either. She becomes more and more emboldened after each of her endeavors.