In honor of @trubandloki!
Now, Now, Now, Donât backslide, you were making wonderful progress.
I am not sure if I could pray any harder for you.
Remember what you said wayyyy back when, You donât like bullies so donât be one now.
Isnât there a thing that if CH sends you a PM with all of their real information it will allow you to pray for them? Isnât that was KK told us way back when?
That must be the issue.
Go Team Michael!
The fact is that he doesnât remember the index event, so he cannot possibly do that, unless he lies. So maybe you need to come to terms with that fact. No psychiatrist would advise him to do that.
Of course thereâs also a lack of any forensic evidence presented, the bite from a dog high up on the left groin when he was supposedly face down on the ground, the 7 minutes of being beaten in the face with a cellphone, and other things that make no sense with the story 2 drug addicts, one an admitted liar tried to spin. BUT⊠even without that, there is the whole memory loss thing.
Well since CH is just ignoring me that could be part of the reason too.
I mean she didnât even thank me for the gift or the prayers that I sent to her.
Sigh whatâs a Pony to do.
Pesky fact #1: the doctors say the âunderlying delusionsâ were about the level of danger Lauren posed and the potential threat of her harming the kids and / or horses? To the point where Michael got security and wasnât sleeping out of vigilance?
IIRC the underlying delusions had nothing to do with the shooting itself, since he had / had no memory of it.
Pesky fact #2: There is no requirement for him to ârecoverâ from a delusional disorder in order to be released from the psychiatric facility. The requirement is that releasing him doesnât pose a danger to himself or to others. Itâs quite possible to have delusions and not be a risk. There are thousands of people living with delusions out there.
Your amateur diagnosis that in order to recover from his delusional disorder he needs to admit or acknowledge something about which he had no memory makes zero sense whatsoever.
@MHM has very usefully explained that her comment âNopeâ means absolutely nothing. So she is not expressing any opinion as to whether I am, or am not, an insider.
Does she have a bot programmed to answer âNopeâ to my every post? Letâs see:
Do I spy you backsliding to being mean again, CH?.
I thought you said you were better than that.
So disappointing, very, very disappointing.
He does not need to lie and say that he remembers pulling the trigger to understand that he shot her.
The jurors were not present at the shooting (excuse me, index event) but based on the evidence and testimony they arrived at the assessment that he shot her. He can understand that he shot her without a direct memory of pulling the trigger by evaluating the evidence presented at the trial, and by listening to his lawyers and doctors, who hopefully are not lying to him.
As usual, your interpretations are incorrect.
At the risk of repeating myself, which is something you certainly love to do:
Nope.
For those that do Thanksgiving, anyone have anything cool to be thankful for?
Me? Michael wonât be in Greystone. (Or behind bars.)
Why I must admit that a bowl full of yummy, yummy alfalfa soaked and warmed daily.
And of course FREEDOM for MB and for all those who love him and have supported him.
Whatâs really old is posters still holding on to the delusion that itâs not a fact that MB shot LK.
MB, thankfully, has faced the unpleasant truth and is trying to move on.
Huh? Now you are making even less sense. Where do these ideas come from?
Itâs a fact that the jury, based on the evidence and testimony they were allowed to see/hear, concluded that Michael shot Lauren while in a state of delusion.
That is not the same as âitâs a fact that MB shot LK.â
To my knowledge there has never been any conclusive evidence to prove that - no video, no gunshot residue evidence, nothing. Had the jury been privy to some information not admissible in court, they may have reached a different verdict. Weâll never know. Nobody can say itâs a fact he shot her; nobody can say itâs a fact he didnât shoot her. Only LK and RG know for sure.
Nowhere has it been reported that Michael had admitted shooting her or has taken responsibility for shooting her. All he allegedly said was that heâs sorry for what he did.
Sorry for taking her on as a student? Sorry for letting her stay on the property? Sorry for exposing his family and clients to such a dangerous individual? Sorry for giving her a deeply discounted rate in return for letting Rob work on the house? Sorry for not having the details of their arrangement spelled out clearly in writing? Sorry for not making her leave when MHG first asked him to? Sorry for getting tangled up in a client dispute which ruined his business and his personal life? Sorry for not simply packing up his horses and family and going to Florida, leaving Lauren behind?
We donât know. And neither do you. So why are you stating your speculation as fact?
Squirrel lâs response
Yes, Michael spending Thanksgiving with people who love him is for sure on my list of things I am thankful for.
Add that Michael has such an amazing list of long term friends who are there for him. That says so much about what kind of person Michael is.
Huh? Now you are making even less sense. Where do these ideas come from?
Itâs a fact that the jury, based on the evidence and testimony they were allowed to see/hear, concluded that Michael shot Lauren while in a state of delusion.
That is not the same as âitâs a fact that MB shot LK.â
Youâre wasting your breath. There are probably close to 10k, maybe more, posts trying to get this simple idea across. No traction yet.
Good to know lol
Pesky fact #1: the doctors say the âunderlying delusionsâ were about the level of danger Lauren posed and the potential threat of her harming the kids and / or horses? To the point where Michael got security and wasnât sleeping out of vigilance?
IIRC the underlying delusions had nothing to do with the shooting itself, since he had / had no memory of it.
Pesky fact #2: There is no requirement for him to ârecoverâ from a delusional disorder in order to be released from the psychiatric facility. The requirement is that releasing him doesnât pose a danger to himself or to others. Itâs quite possible to have delusions and not be a risk. There are thousands of people living with delusions out there.
Your amateur diagnosis that in order to recover from his delusional disorder he needs to admit or acknowledge something about which he had no memory makes zero sense whatsoever.
Thank you for sharing these facts!
Huh? Now you are making even less sense. Where do these ideas come from?
Itâs a fact that the jury, based on the evidence and testimony they were allowed to see/hear, concluded that Michael shot Lauren while in a state of delusion.
That is not the same as âitâs a fact that MB shot LK.â
Precisely!
To my knowledge there has never been any conclusive evidence to prove that - no video, no gunshot residue evidence, nothing. Had the jury been privy to some information not admissible in court, they may have reached a different verdict. Weâll never know. Nobody can say itâs a fact he shot her; nobody can say itâs a fact he didnât shoot her. Only LK and RG know for sure.
Exactly!
Nowhere has it been reported that Michael had admitted shooting her or has taken responsibility for shooting her. All he allegedly said was that heâs sorry for what he did.
Indeed
Sorry for taking her on as a student? Sorry for letting her stay on the property? Sorry for exposing his family and clients to such a dangerous individual? Sorry for giving her a deeply discounted rate in return for letting Rob work on the house? Sorry for not having the details of their arrangement spelled out clearly in writing? Sorry for not making her leave when MHG first asked him to? Sorry for getting tangled up in a client dispute which ruined his business and his personal life? Sorry for not simply packing up his horses and family and going to Florida, leaving Lauren behind?
Highly Likely
We donât know. And neither do you. So why are you stating your speculation as fact?
Interesting question.
I wonder if there are certain legal implications if MB were to actually admit he shot LK? I mean, there is still an insurance lawsuit hanging out there. Might it complicate that ongoing legal matter if he actually went ahead and admitted that he did shoot Lauren that day?
I think that might be an issue.
It sure would be a shame if MB was coerced into making an admission like that, because of the way the ongoing Krol process was being handled, and then lost out on a financial settlement from the insurance lawsuit.
Yes