Vetting the OTTB....how exhaustive should you be?

@Jleegriffith
I have noticed with reading back rads, that it can be like reading tea leaves and it is not always indicative of whether or not the horse is in pain, or pain free. I have not seen much correlation between degree of remodeling (or separation) and pain. :yes: Barring the major overlap, which usually is obvious. This is the same for alljoint and/or bone problems in the horse, though, and is not at all unique to back x-rays… we all know horses do not read their x-rays. :lol:

One vet will say “this is not a problem”, the other will be more guarded and advise you to pass… However, if there is remodeling, that does show that physically, there is something the horse’s body has reacted negatively to.

What do you do with that information?

I think sellers are getting frustrated that they are “missing out on sales” due to these films showing some sort of remodeling, so they think that this is unnecessary or annoying or inconvenient… but that’s not fair to the buyer either. We know that remodeling can be early evidence of kissing spine, and that it does impact a good deal of sport horses; it also limits the career of them down the line… so why buy trouble?

Ironically, horse people seem to have short memories – this was the same exact complaint of several breed registries when certain x-rays became required for approval and/or for PPEs… hock and stifle among them… :lol:

Most buyers understand that KS is not curable, so even a small shred of evidence on x-rays, can be one of the first warning signs of the disease.

It’s good that buyers are vetting for this now. It gives vets more exposure to this disease, which is not very well understood – and it also has picked up momentum to study the disease… Hopefully we get more answers and definitive ways to diagnose and treat…

There’s a few studies out now, some more heartening than others, that show that the disease can be at least managed in some cases. There’s also plenty of literature that proves that Kissing Spine can be a career killer, and causes wastage in sport endeavors.

It gets messier because there is not much information out there about what is a symptomatic kissing spine horse, and even better, not every horse demonstrates reliable symptoms! KS is one of those diseases you might not diagnose off of an x-ray alone. usually it is a clinical examination of the horse, combined with undersaddle behavior. Most horses are stoic and protect themselves so just a visual exam is not always helpful.

Most people can’t tell a horse is lame unless it limps. And with KS horses, many do not limp.

A lot of the behaviors or things you’d see that clue you off a horse has KS, can be explained away by other issues: general young horse weakness, young horse temperament/freshness, “laziness”, dishonesty, sore feet, bad saddle fit… then there’s the actual physical symptoms that manifest and not all of them related to a limping leg: weak stifles, balance issues, toe drag, suspensory lesions, bucking after fences, girthiness, saddle/blanketing irritability, loss of energy, thriftiness, intermittent front limb lameness, work and/or exercise intolerance.

Pretty big list… could cover everything from ulcers to suspensory injury!

The problem with some TB and WB lines, is that there are several big name stallions that are at least to my knowledge, consistently siring horses with close or interlapping vertebrae and/or cervical arthritis. Add that they race so hard so young, and are not worked correctly in terms of sport horse work, and you are likely to find some sort of abnormality or pathology on film if you go looking hard enough… Whether or not it hurts the horse, you don’t find out until the horse is in serious work - a handful of rides off the track is NOT serious work… Palpitation of the back is absolutely worthless for diagnosing the amount of pain and whether or not the horse has KS.

Now, remodeling is very different than overlapping, which is something you should always be walking away from in a PPE. Some minor noise in a film is not always a big deal, but major remodeling and or overlapping processes is absolutely a red flag for long term soundness. Kissing spine becomes systemic: the horse compensates body-wide and the most common thing I see is suspensory soreness and/or stifle soreness from compensation.

I have seen enough radiographs of symptomatic horses to know that if you see some sort of remodeling, it likely means something. I am more likely to be wary of a 3 y/o with remodeling than a 16 y.o… IME, it’s very rare that an adult sport-horse’s back and neck vets completely clean – especially as they get into the teens and up. I would be more likely to consider it a non-issue in a 15 y/o that has been doing its job happily for the last 5 years, than a 3 y/o riding prospect.

The other problem with kissing spine is I usually see it get worse in yearly check-ups. I have seen the disease be cumulative; over time it typically causes other issues, because it impacts everything. SI soreness, stifle soreness, and suspensory soreness are the most common side effects of KS, You won’t see this in a 3 y/o you have for a few weeks. You will see it in your riding horse that you have for ten years.

If you want to track the longevity of horses diagnosed with KS, I do urge anyone interested to at least follow on any one of the KS Support Groups on FB. There’s two big groups (one is German, Pferde Mitt Kissing Spines), and it is very eye-opening to read. Even with the best treatments out there (such as lig snip surgery and/or bone shave), there is a disproportionate amount of failure to return to a riding career with these horses… and you would be surprised at their radiographs – not all of which look awful.

Wow, this post got long – and I have not even touched into c-spine arthritis… which you should ALWAYS walk away from on film, with both WBs and TBs…

2 Likes

As a side note though is kissing spine a symptom or a cause? Anecdotally I’ve known a long backed WB to “develop” it after lengthy time off and then both the symptoms Nd closeness of the processes resolved with a rigorous rehab focused on core fitness. Also it’s been implicated as a “chicken or egg” with things like ulcers and suspensories- as in vet felt (and recovery supported) that the other issue caused poor posture and subsequent back problem which resolved when the primary issue did.

And like Beowulf said, sometimes the findings are “incidental” because it’s not associated with actual symptoms (like the notorious navicular xray study where vets couldnt pick a lame horse reliably on rads alone)

I wouldn’t look at the question as “should I PPE a cheaper horse?” but rather for an OTTB the question should be “should I PPE a horse who worked extremely hard long before his skeleton was mature, usually on painkillers/lasix, and trained by people who only care if he lasts a year or two?” and also “is the cost of retiring a youngster less than a PPE” or “am I OK with letting an unsound horse go to an unknown fate by not keeping it?”

1 Like

If you are assuming the worst in all cases to be safe, then this is probably an okay plan. But for the record, it is not an accurate representation of everyone on the backside. When I bought my horse of a lifetime for $1900 as a low-end claimer at a small racetrack, I knew from talking to the trainer and looking at his entire shedrow that this guy cared about his horses. They were not throw-aways. That particular trainer was known to say “no” to prospective buyers because he felt they were a bad fit for his retiring racehorses. He talked to me for two hours about this horse. He actually finished his entire string early that morning so that he could concentrate solely on my visit at 0900. Is that every trainer? Absolutely not. The other horse I looked at (did not purchase) another trainer literally pointed at the stall down the aisle, said “He’s in there,” and left me to check him out by myself while he worked his entire string. Not another word. So sometimes knowing the trainer (speaking to references or organization staff like CANTER) can help the buyer gauge how in depth they need to take the PPE.

My guy was meant to stay with me, he was not a resale project. Thus, I spent about $200 on basic PPE and flexions and took the horse home. Never took a lame step in the 4.5 years we had together. For resale prospects, I would do a more thorough PPE and get rads.

My current horse was a more expensive 3 year old unblemished polo reject (TB but not track trained), I spent $1300 on a PPE and xrayed All The Things just to have a baseline.

3 Likes

I think this is very unfair to a lot of racing connections. There’s good and bad eggs in every discipline, racing included.

I am not against racing and there is no better litmus test IMHO than racing consistently in terms of long term soundness… which is why I prefer a horse that has more than a handful of starts in general. The ones that campaign consistently usually retire to second disciplines and do very well, and stay sound.

My first OTTB had 75 starts. I got him when I was 13. He raced for seven years, averaging ~15 starts a year. He barely made more than it cost to feed, board, and train him a month, per start. Actually, if I do the math, I think they lost money with him… but he was consistent. He was being raced by connections that adored him. The owner bred him, owned him for almost nine years, and when she lost her husband was forced to disperse everything down to her farm - he was one of the last things she let go, and she begged a friend who ran a rescue to take him in and find him a forever home… and… that’s how I ended up with him. He was sound, sound, sound; the only issue he ever had in the 17 years we were lucky to have him was a suspensory injury caused by poor trimming. He was no one’s throw-away, cast-away, or anything – and he ended up being the horse of a lifetime for not one, but four people. He was an incredible horse, and everyone at the farm still misses him.

Anyway, if you think that is a one off, we have a TB now that came through the CANTER adoption program. After a handful of lackluster starts he was donated to the program by his owner, who he was named after. This horse never had a bad day. I never had a friendlier, happier, sweeter horse step off of a trailer than him - you can tell he was never mishandled a day in his life, and his owners were very fond of him.

I know I am not supposed to have favorites, but my favorite OTTB that I’ve owned, also came from very conscientious connections. He hadn’t even raced yet (but had been training) and they knew he was not going to be a race horse. They gave him to me for free, which was a huge hit for them, since he was bred in the purple and his father’s stud-fee could have bought you a house.

Racing is a hard sport. It’s unforgiving, in a lot of ways – but that does not mean the people in it are callous or uncaring about where their horses go after their racing career is over. It only takes a few rotten apples in the discipline to sour the whole cart, IME.

7 Likes

Hey, call me burned by my experiences, but even with the best of trainers, the facts are:

  1. A racing TB starts work at 18-24 months old on average. A change from 40 years ago, when they got started at 3.

  2. “Ninety two percent of all horses who raced in North America in 2001 ran on Lasix. The states with the highest percentages were Kentucky and California, while New York had the lowest. The numbers are nearly as high for 2-year-olds.” ( http://www.espn.com/horse/columns/misc/1417524.html ) As we know, most of them don’t need it for lung bleeds…

  3. “Data compiled by the Daily Racing Form indicates that in 2009 99% of horses that ran in California pre-raced on Bute (7391 out of 7443). In a similar study of Suffolk Downs runners, 92% of horses pre-raced on Bute (1062 out of 1158).” ( https://www.paulickreport.com/news/ray-s-paddock/keeping-bute-out-of-the-food-chain/ )

Yes, you’re right. Those trainers may be really nice people, they may truly love the horses, they may watch carefully for injuries and sincerely wish the horses ended up in good homes when they cease racing (often due to injury…), but they are involved in an industry whose default practices are detrimental the the horse as an animal, based on the above three points alone. And there are more to consider.

The thoroughbred is an amazing animal - my favorite breed. It’s just that it’s acceptable to treat them in a way that doesn’t do anything for their long term soundness, let alone short term - but a few hardy individuals that can escape the almost inevitable racing injuries… ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racehorse_injuries )

So, my advice stands: PPE a TB more thoroughly than his price would indicate.

1 Like