[QUOTE=Sandy M;4005124]
ā¦Mass marketing, at a very high price, of old knowledge wrapped in a new package. But you canāt sell the experience needed to make it work effectively (e.gā¦, reading the horseās reactions properly) , ergo, the most adept Parelli practitioners Iāve encountered are ammys or pros in other disciplines ā¦[/QUOTE]
Yes, and therefore, most Parelli followers and doomed to be unsuccessful, since the target audience is those w/o such experience.
One would think this marketing flaw would backfire at some point, but I guess that never happens till after the $$ are in the Pās pockets, and voracious capitalists that they are, what happens after that is of no import. Itās a shame that the horses are the ones that pay the price.
A friend of mine, a devoted, successful classical dressage rider who has clinicād w/ WAZāand was told how refreshing she was because she rode sympathetically and with soft, minimal, but effective aidsātook a difficult youngster to a local, good horsemanship cowboy (student of Brannaman and Hunt) to be started. After a few days, she and I went to visit, and she jokingly asked what the filly was doing, was she WTC under saddle yet? The cowboy smiled his shy smile and said, well, as a matter of fact, yes. Her jaw dropped to her knees. She went back several times, of course, during the course of his work with the filly, and has actually clinicād with the cowboy several times since and has been able to further improve some aspects of her work with her horses, based on what she learned from him. She was flabberghasted that there was still some simple, elementary things for her to learn that really made a differenceāthings weāve talked about here that simply get overlooked in a lot of dressage programs, things that the ānaturalsā assume are natural to the rest of us, but in fact are not.
It is a shame that the Parellis and their kind give this kind of horsemanship such a bad name. Itās the horses that are ultimately hurt by it, and that is just very, very sad to me.