Why aren't Quarter Horses More Popular in the H/J Ring?

[QUOTE=Equino;4676937]

Also, those popular Labradoodles Rugbug loves so much (I kid, I kid!), those breeders are known for culling the puppies born without the desirable coats in hopes of creating a new breed. One day they may be successful in producing a new breed. That is basically how Boarder Collies came about-from “Collie Dogs” who herded the best.[/QUOTE]

OK, OK I know it’s really off-topic but i have to chime in here. You could not have picked a more controversial breed to use in your example. If you really want to see knock down and drag out forum fights that put the mild bickering here to shame then look up some of the AKC/ISDS/ABCA Border Collie discussions. The ABCA fought long and hard to prevent the AKC from including the Border Collie, and lost. They will not register any dog that has a conformation title in it’s pedigree and will de-register one if it acquires it after the fact. The ISDS will not accept a dog based solely on its AKC registry. Effectively the breed has been split in two both in type and nearly in genetics. Some breeders maintain all 3 registries but if the dog or it’s ancestors get a conformation title… there goes the ISDS and ABCA registry.

The ISDS hosts the largest and most prestigious sheep herding trials and promotes the working dog. The AKC cares only for conformation (they have some small herding trials but nothing in comparison) and consistency and are quickly losing the working ability in their dogs. They are distainfully called “Barbie Collies” by the working dog afficianados and it goes the other way with distain for the wide range in the visual apppearance of the working dog and calling it “not a breed because there is too much variation”. But I don’t care if it’s a 25 lb smooth coated tri or a 50 lb long haired red, if it works like a Border Collie and moves like a Border Collie, it is one. There is no mistaking that crouch and intensity, and the “eye” that is so prized. The big, beautiful, fluffy, dome-headed dogs that the AKC is promoting that have soft eyes and little herding instinct are the same breed in name only. Not to say they aren’t sweet, loving, beautiful family dogs, but they are not the same animal.

But this really does pertain to the AQHA. The halter classes have produced what some consider a beautiful, uniform animal, and others deem as useless in function… but there are animals being bred for performance and the smart breeder and buyer knows the difference. I personally think that the AQHA registry is large enough for everybody to have their niche and get along. If you don’t like the 7/8 TB hunters then don’t buy them, don’t show hunters where they excel. Stick to the classes the foundation type horses excel in and buy from those breeders. We can all play nice.

To the OP, there are QHs doing well in hunters, as many have pointed out. The breed is evolving so that they are getting even better at hunters, but they are still overcoming the traits that the QH was originally bred for. A nice, up-hill, long strided animal with a beautiful natural jump makes the rider’s job easy. Packaging a long-backed, downhill horse, and trying to stretch a shorter stride to it’s max to make a line just makes it harder. No one’s saying there aren’t great QH hunters, but if you’re looking for a horse to do well at 3’ plus, there are other breeds who have been bred with the qualities to do that exceptionally well for much longer and the QHs that do excel are the ones that got the peculiar mix of genetics that make them look and function so much like the other breeds.

But that being said, you asked about fox hunting, and QHs are GREAT at that. They have wonderful minds which is your #1 priority in the field. They have a great jump. There are no “lines” in hunting so it doesn’t matter if your horse can’t comfortably canter a 12’ stride. An athletic QH of good conformation can easily do a 2’6"-3’ coop. You do want to look for a horse that is as balanced as possible, which usually means level or uphill. You don’t want a horse heavy and clumsy on the forehand while galloping down a steep stretch of road, or through trappy footing. Look for one of medium to lighter build for the endurance. You don’t want a big muscle-bound horse that won’t be able to last the day. I’d say any of the QHs you see in the 3’ AQHA classes have the potential to make fabulous fox hunters.

Our hunt is at least 3/4 paints, a few full TBs, a couple Arabs, a couple QHs and several draft crosses. Your best place to find a fox hunter is through word of mouth or FOL. Even the most level-headed show horse can lose it in a field of galloping horses and 50 dashing, speaking fox hounds!

I’ve seen the Pleasure Horse Division offered at two different “A” shows. I know one was over Easter weekend. Fri-Sat had all the usual classes, then Sunday just PHD division, canceled both years it was offered. I saw another circuit do the same thing-PHD was on the last day of the show, only division and was canceled. When I asked what was the point, I was told they had reserved those days for their show, so if they didn’t host some division, they would lose the day. So, maybe not the same idea as how many divisions must be offered.

To muddy the question, the 3’ divisions are C rated even if held at a AA rated, only the 3’6" and up are A rated divisions and there are money offered requirments a show must meet.

Right-Adults at the biggest AAA show is still run under the Zone specs, so it is always a “C” rated division, despite rating of the show. I have been to many shows (“A” or “B” rated) that offered 4 o/f classes for the “C” rated divisions, and held over two days. I just never been to a fully ran “C” rated show that lasted more than one day.

Most of the 1 day shows don’t offer a full slate of divisions-many top out at 3’.

I have seen Big Eq offered on one days. Sometimes even the Jr’s or 1st Years, etc, but with only 3 o/f classes, not a big draw, so it’s not popular.

I understand ABCA is concerned that the AKC doesn’t promote performance over conformation, or insist on performance AND conformation. But at the same time, ABCA is not going to turn away an aggressive working dog that kills sheep or one that is so crippled, it can’t herd anymore than the AKC is going to turn away an ugly dog that has a zillion conformation faults or is blind, deaf, lame and cannot herd/participate in agility or obedience or whatnot. So, I guess in a way, this is similar to the debate about the AQHA breed registry Vs performance registry that has been brought up in this thread.

My parents just bought their 1st Boarder Collie. The mother was imported to help the breeder improve on her line. Mom showed in the breed ring earned her Championship title, and has numerous Obedience, Agility and Herding titles. There is no doubt that she is all Borader Collie though! Our female won’t be shown in the breed ring and has started training for her career in Agility. What a fantastic dog, and such strong instincts. I realize different groups will insist on certain traits and characteristics, but I do believe form leads to function. I have seen some BC’s who are bigger, thicker boned and have fluffier coats-some who still work great, some who aren’t quite as athletic. But as long they still possess similar traits that make up the BC…I just hate when you see one who could be mistaken for an Aussie with an uncut tail-bigger, more square body, w/similar heads.

I’ve never shown in AQHA shows (I’m a cheap TB owning hunter gal through and through), but I’ve watched and even announced at a few over the years. To my non-expert eye, it appears that QH are being bred more for specialities now…ie. the Halter horses are a completely different body/conformation type than the Hunters.

When I think QH, I usually picture a heavier pleasure or halter horse, but the last local AQHA rated show I went to had a class full of gorgeous Hunter U/S that clearly had a TON of Thoroughbred in them. They were ridden with a lower head set than you’d ever see at a A show, but on the whole were not BUILT downhill. Ridden in a different frame, they would not have been out of place at a rated hunter jumper show. If I hadn’t known, I would have bet money that a few of them were warmbloods.

I own an Appendix Quarter Horse, and I’ve taken him to a good amount of Hunter Shows and have done extremely well. He is a 17.3 hh bay with a huge step and just glides over fences and is very quiet around the arena. Hunters actually want him more than AQHA people. I think it all depends on the type of AQH you have. And, it’s all about how well it goes around too!

The family horse we just lost dumped me plenty of time in the Beg division. Since he didn’t care for jumping, my trainer let me ride her ex grand-prix horse in beg and int divisions. He was a QH and absolute sweet heart. Added strides, good rollbacks, he was awesome. But this was almost 20 years ago…

One of our boarders is a registered QH who makes it down the lines with ease. Unfortunately, he has a puss face in general ( unless he is out on the trails) but that is another thread… we are trying to conquer that one. It just makes him look so miserable in the ring. He also prefers to shuffle along but moves well when we make him move out.

The anwer to the OPs question asked 7 months ago was also answered back then.

Reading back over the pages on this one-before it wandered into other species-yields some good discussion and example from those not likely to get involved again. Not a bad read.

hard to come by

I think it all depends on the type of AQH you have. And, it’s all about how well it goes around too! I think it all depends on the type of AQH you have. And, it’s all about how well it goes around too!Absolutely! though honestly, in the nearly 30 years I was buying and selling I came across onlyONE1/2 QH, 1/2 TB, but, t, not really an appendix; who, "fit the bill; I had a hunter friend show him and fox hunt him; she eventually sold him to someone in Charlottesville, where as far as we know, he, is still foxhunting; but, honestly, for the time effort and , $ we put into him; we could have done a couple of OTTbs!

form and function

having worked for QH breeders; the trot an canter bred for do not contribute to good jumping ability:no:/ movement; severely restricting their use. that unfotunately requires changes in judging; as long as the square downhill horse built around the forehand with sickle hocks, overly massive rump is bred for and rewarded not much will change; overemphasis on a pretty head and tail:no: ignores , the parts which make the horse a good athlete :yes:; I’m told the AQHA is made up of very intelligent smart, in a business sense people:cool:, they could use a course/ seminar, clinic with Susan Harris :yes:“the visible horse”) There is a reason the Parellis base is QH; especially the Western Pleasure:(:o type

I had a 15 hand QH as my first horse! He was awesome, but when we moved up to the 3 foot, he was just lacking the step. He was 19 yrs old and sound as could be, but 3 foot at the big shows was too big. He was a perfect 2’6"-2’9" horse.:yes:

He was more of the foundation QH, so not these TB labeled as QH.

Pictures(should be able to see without facebook):
Little me and him: http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=37875917&l=12a4cd537e&id=19200064

a confo shot of sorts:
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=37891368&l=582a42b6a9&id=19200064

Doing his thing:
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=37891455&l=f8f5584ad5&id=19200064

Ignore the fashion:
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=37891493&l=50473424d5&id=19200064

Collage of him:
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=37891494&l=d648d92577&id=19200064

Whole album of him:
http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=2245661&id=19200064&l=a5b8ded0dd

He brought me from cross rails to Children’s hunters. He sold before we even put him on the market after people heard I was looking for a new horse. He went and packed his new kid around 2’6"-2’9" like a pro.:smiley:

The Appendix Horse

I think these were the American answer to the WB before the WB arrived. I knew some very nice ones as a kid. Tall, big strided, balanced and friendlier than a Golden Retriever.

I understand they have been bred up-- into tall, narrow Wenglish horses. But if I had a lotta time and money, I’d create…

an Appendix QH USEF Hunter BREEDING EMPIRE.

A breeding empire, I tell you.

Who wouldn’t want a pretty pet of an animal with a 14’ stride?

Generally, the comments about size and build are true but there are some unbelievable quarter horses out there, for sure. I leased one that I rode in the jumpers and he was wickedly fast and careful and was one of the most fun I’ve ever ridden. We also had another in the barn who was 17 hands, gorgeous, gorgeous, gorgeous and he was a very successful junior hunter. My children’s hunter was an appendix. I think it has to do with how they are bred: if they do breed show h/j they are bred differently (for different characteristics) than we might breed a regular h/j horse. Plus, the training thing. At the breed level in the U/S, etc., they like to see a very different look. It’s hard to untrain one that has been trained to go with head to knees, downhill.

Needless to say, I never turn my nose up at one if they come along since they seem to have great heart, courage and personality.

Everybody wants that and if AQHA breeders had a market for it? They’d be breeding for it and you would actually see more of them in the ring. Especially at the USEF/USHJA AA rated Open level Hunters showing 3’6" and above where they are currently just about non exsistent. If you know one at 3’6" or better Hunters that pins, please name it.

Unfortunately, truely good moving mares and stallions of any breed are expensive and the best market (meaning more buyers wanting to spend more money) for AQHA horses is in the AQHA arena-where that 14’ stride at an actual gallop is the last thing that will entice those numerous HUS buyers. Plus the biggest market is also for the Junior horse, that being, IIRC, the horse is 5 and under. Breeders breed what they can sell the quickest.

[QUOTE=findeight;5127887]
If you know one at 3’6" or better Hunters that pins, please name it.[/QUOTE]

“She’s Got The Blue”, shows in the USEF under the name “Conundrum” Was very successful in the Sm Jrs. and when the rider aged out, she became her Mom’s mount in the AA’s, with an occasional outing in the Ammy ring.

Findeight, I hear you on AQHA trends and breeders meeting them. And have you seen the clothes that people thought were cool in the 1980s?

That’s why I wish I had started my Breeding Empire 30 years ago. (Well, OK, 20 years ago when I met my first very nice Appendix horses as a kid.)

Of course, if I started today, I’d be dead before the Breeding Empire attained true greatness and hegemony in the USEF hunters. But what I wouldn’t give to find some rare pocket of the kind of Appendix horses somewhere.

if I had a Qh hunter… i’d never show him on the open circuit. Not much prize money and prizes compared to AQHA.

Love them or hate them, you gotta admit the AQHA does a heckuva job getting prize money/sponsors/etc. lol.

I’m a QH gal and ride with a USEF trainer. I mainly show QH, because the entries, stalls, and show fees are cheaper and with a good horse you get returns with incentive fund which helps out more than you often get at USEF shows.

For breeding the over fences QH, unfortunately there is not a true breeding market. Most of the good ones are HUS bred that didn’t make it. They had too much step, a little too much knee, etc. Some are out of no name studs - they just happen to be athletic and typey. There are a few sires, like Sunnys Hot Jazz, that are known more for their o/f horses than HUS horses, but they are few and far between.

Also, the lines may not be 14’ like they are for some of the big Hunter classes, but at the larger shows, they will open the lines up past 12’ for the senior working hunter horses. They are going over the larger jumps, and have the bigger steps, and I remember watching at Redbud a couple of the trainers go up and ask the course designer to open the lines and they did. It was nice to see, but the horses looked like they could have handled them even more open without difficulty.

Wow. You AQHA folks make an open-minded, budget-minded gal think hard.

Stay in the USEF hunters and need a 6-figure horse to move up in Hunter World (then pay 2x or so the stall fees at the same venue that held the breed show last week)?

Or, buy a cheaper horse, pay cheaper entry fees and win more?

I might even get a deal on the horse because I’d want the failed HUS who could jump big.

Hmm… my QH supposedly had papers when he came through auction, that ended up “in the dealer’s files” (a.k.a. the back seat of his truck)… wonder if I could somehow find AQHA papers to match a chestnut gelding with a blaze and sock… d;

I wish AQHA could just take one look at my horse, say, “That’s a QH,” and give me papers so I could show him in breed shows. It’s not like he’s going to regrow balls and be bred…