This is not meant to be a super-controversial discussion but I had forgotten how much harder the I1 used to be until I dug up footage of my mother riding her stallion in the mid-late 80’s.
if this is viewed as advertising, it is not meant to be…just footage of the test in question & the horse is deceased
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXVjKEnD5ac
There was a swing rein back (trot-halt-back-forward-back-trot out), 4-8-8-4 zigzag, extended trot into medium AROUND the arena, as well as the regular extensions, mediums, 2s, 3s, full pirouettes and then the capper - a canter-halt-rein back-canter out on the last centerline before the final halt.
Blame some form of amnesia but I honestly didn’t remember the tests being HARD until I watched the footage. By comparison, the current test is a breeze. (I am not being snotty, I swear) But all of the HARD stuff is gone at I1…what is left is not easy by any means but it is a dumbed-down version of the old test.
I remember the PSG had canter 10m 1/2 circles in true & counter canter with a single change on the long side to do the same exercise on the other rein. And there used to be a 6 loop serpentine & the swing (halt-rein back-forward-back). The canter zig zag used to be 5m-10m-10m-5m…where did all this stuff go?
The GP has had major changes for crowd appeal (gone are the walk pirouettes, swing rein back, etc). Test B is is wa-aay easier than Test A was…so that too is part of my question…is the marketing aspect ruling what riders/horses are expected to do in the arena?
Why did this happen?