I was going to avoid commenting, but then thought this might be useful to others.
I ran across the WF/Art2Ride stuff on this forum a couple years ago. At the time, I was working with my new OTTB gelding who needed to work more over the back and overall just loosen up. So I watched a few videos, subscribed to the channel, even submitted a video for critique at one point. Yeah, I bought into it. Didn’t do homework or know about the abuse charge. Also, I didn’t learn anything from his input that I didn’t already know. Come to think of it, I can’t recall a single piece of information he provided that was particularly useful, or that he hadn’t already repeated in someone else’s critique.
I come from a hunter background, but grew up with a fundamental knowledge and practical application of basic dressage, and used periodic stretching to help reschool and rehab many a poorly started horse, with good results. It was something I used to a point (and then bring the horse up), never before had I considered using it to the extent that WF preaches. Bottom line, my horse turned out fine, but spending months focusing on stretching probably didn’t get us any further along than a more conventional training model. My gelding seems to enjoy the stretching, and we still use it every ride as a break and to change the length of his outline. I think a lot of his development and the strong back he has is in part because some of that stretching contributed to a solid foundation. But so did the hill work, the long hacks, the ground pole exercises, the gridwork, a well-fitted saddle…
Bottom line: don’t give this man your money. This is his “method” at work:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83jYtsPHFxI
Another COTHer pointed that out to me back in the day, and this video says a lot. If someone can explain why WF’s shoulder blades are almost touching the horse’s back I’d love to know.
Stretching is good. It has its time and place, and usefulness. It is a valuable tool and a stepping stone, but not the end goal. I don’t subscribe to some of the theories I’ve seen on this forum that a horse has to be 2nd/3rd level in order to properly and usefully stretch. I’ve seen it work wonders on horses of all ages, shapes, and levels of training. But WF’s problem appears to be that it’s his one tool in his toolbox. I looked on that YouTube channel yesterday and some folks from a couple years ago are now “associate trainers” and still doing the same stuff with the same horses. WF offers some passionate discussion about the state of dressage and tells people THIS is the one thing that will fix it. And they buy it. And then they do endless loops in the arena with their horse’s nose in their dirt, and end up going nowhere anyway. It’s just taking advantage of people who don’t know any better.