This is the older thread.
http://www.chronofhorse.com/forum/showthread.php?419970-Asking-for-donations-for-horse-injury
As for tacky, it’s in the eye of the beholder. Long before these web sites came around, school children and Girl Scouts were peddling overpriced candy bars and cookies to fund their hobbies. I know plenty of poor high school/college students who “crowdfunded” by asking their parents and friends to give cash for Christmas toward a big purchase like a saddle. And guess what? Adults crowdfund too. It happens every single Sunday, in every single church in America, when they pass the offering plate.
What makes it “tacky” is when the requester’s motivations, or rhetorical pitch, is not compatible with your personal beliefs and goals. In this case, the campaigner is three months behind on her board already, appears to have no serious prospects for getting back on her financial feet in the near future, etc. So from my perspective, yes, this campaign is tacky. But let’s imagine tweaking the pitch just a smidge. And to really make my point, I’ll use a real campaign as an example: the campaign to raise funds for Talia Czapski, a young eventer who was hit by a drunk driver and suffered serious injuries that will take a year of recovery. Talia had a reputation for being a cheerful, hard worker at the barn who was affording her horse expenses just fine. Her friends and BO easily raised enough funds to care for her beloved eventing horse during Talia’s recovery year. So absolutely, in that case, crowdfunders were “funding Talia’s hobby.” But it’s because the campaign spoke to them.
Or to hit closer to home, how many of you gave money to the recent COTHer who had gotten a divorce and was desperate to afford hay for her horses + some basic car repairs? Some of you reacted with sympathy and sent money. Others said “If you didn’t plan for your own financial health separate from DH, that’s your bad.” Again, it’s all in the eye of the beholder.
“Panhandling” means “putting out your pan and hoping for a donation, for which people will receive almost nothing in return.” But sometimes, people do get something in return: at the very least, in a well-run crowdfunding campaign, they feel warm fuzzies. They often feel a sense of comraderie and community with the campaign sponsor and the other donors. In a really really good campaign, they feel like they’re part of something bigger and more important than themselves. And in some campaigns, you get actual physical stuff as a thank-you gift.
The campaign you linked to is not likely to inspire those feelings, but there’s plenty of other horse-and-hobby-related campaigns that can. Here’s just a few that were moderately successful and that I do not personally find tacky. Most of them are athletes who have been working hard to make their dreams come true, or rescue organizations working toward a particular fundraising goal. It’s clear from their campaigns that this isn’t the only way they’re raising money. And honestly, I would welcome a crowdfunding campaign from an eventing rider that I liked and supported. I keep waiting to see which eventer will actually figure this out first and do it. Syndicating a horse is sorta kinda a version of crowdfunding, I guess.
https://www.rallyme.com/rallies/65
http://www.gofundme.com/5xe8r8
http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/going-for-the-gold