I’m so on the fence about this and I’d love some opinions
Last year I relocated to a new area and hunted the season with the local hunt – Hunt A. I was excited to get out into some new country, meet local people etc. It was . . . fine . . . the people were nice and I have made some friends, but it wasn’t as friendly as my old hunt. The hunting itself was quite different – the country tends to be steep and clay footing – so it can be pretty slippery and therefore the hunting is slower. Cancellations when it gets wetter through winter aren’t uncommon.
I also went out a few times with Hunt B as a guest. Hunt B is quite a bit further, but on very good footing and while steep at some properties it’s never slippery and rarely has cancellations. Hunt B is over some beautiful open country and runs fast. Even on “average” days I’ve enjoyed myself with them.
Average drive time to Hunt A is just over 1hr, Hunt B is 2-2.5hrs. I’ve done day trips to Hunt B fairly frequently and it’s fine, but I’m worried I’ll get partway into the season and get sick of it. Most of the drive time is on reasonable roads, some of the hunts are on some windy back roads for the last 30min or so. The distance would also make it more difficult for me to be involved in the hunt – working bees etc.
Financially I can’t afford to join both. I can cap with Hunt A up to 6 x per season, which means I could go out with them if Hunt B is at one of their further away fixtures. I generally only hunt in the weekend and work full time, so don’t want to be totally shattered every Monday! I can occasionally overnight at a friend’s in Hunt B’s area if I wanted/needed to.
Really, I love Hunt B – the country and the style of hunting just really suits me. Hunt A is nice – if it was the only option I’d enjoy it.