Zayat- A little background

[QUOTE=Tiger Paws;8178018]
Not to derail this thread further, but with all due respect I think the various people on this thread who are part of the industry are missing the point.

All commercial transactions, be they for the purchase of a horse or anything else should as a matter law be open and transparent. What has been described on this thread is anything but. What has been described is no more than a con game.

If the point of a sale or auction is to come to a meeting of the minds as to what the sale price should be, why not state that up front? Why not say, the owner of this horse will not accept less than $X, and then let the buyer decide if he or she is willing to pay that amount? [/QUOTE]

That is exactly what happens through the auction process. If you think that’s a “con game” then you still don’t understand what’s going on.

When you have false bids the problem is not that the buyer pays more than they are willing to pay, that can’t happen unless there is a gun to his head. The problem occurs because he pays more than he had to pay.

How can the price be more than the buyer had to pay if that’s the lowest amount that the seller is willing accept in order to make the deal? Why should the buyer be able to choose the amount the horse is worth rather than the seller??

That’s like saying that if you go look at a horse that’s for sale privately at a price of 30k and you offer 20k and the seller refuses your offer, the seller is doing something illegal by not accepting your offer. And that if you subsequently pay 30K for that same horse, you’ve been conned.

The bids made below a horse’s reserve are not “false bids”. They are legitimate bids made by people who hope to pay less for the horse than the seller wants to sell him for.

Has no one here ever gone horse shopping and when inquiring about price been told “Make an offer”?? That’s the same thing that’s happening at an auction.

(Done now. Really.)

I understand LaurieB’s point- if you do not want to bid what is being asked, don’t

I also understand that if some of those bids are just people jumping up the bid, which happens virtually everywhere- even at the low end sales- that is something that takes away from the transparency of the process.

But, it is part of the game, and it isn’t going away. So, bid to where you want to, and then, walk away.

[QUOTE=ravenclaw;8176616]
… I have lost a little respect for Zayat. Doesn’t he have enough money already? :lol:[/QUOTE]
I was starting to warm a bit toward Zayat because his enthusiasm post-Derby was sort of endearing. Then, in between Derby and Preakness, I heard him being interviewed (Steve Byk, I believe) and discussing the heartbreak of his Derby misses. Now this is one pain I could never quite feel but…anyway. Anyway, in good-naturedly sighing over the vagaries of racing, Zayat refers to Pioneer of The Nile (I know, but autocorrect isn’t having it) getting beat “by a longshot that never won another race.” And the conversation moves on while…
Cue the skidding record noise. Now I’m no raging Mine That Bird fan, and whatever his post-TC record may have been and however technically true this statement may be – but didn’t MTB show up to all three races and hit the board every time (beating POTN uh-gain in the process)? And, uh, could it also not be said POTN never won another race again either? It just burned my whatever because, as far as I’m concerned, any horse that shows up (and shows up) three times in five weeks, at the classic distances, deserves at least grudging respect in this day and age.
I had (nearly) forgotten about it until I read Zayat’s magnanimous comments regarding the worthiness of AP’s Belmont competitors. I guess he can afford graciousness now!

[QUOTE=ASB Stars;8178494]
I understand LaurieB’s point- if you do not want to bid what is being asked, don’t

I also understand that if some of those bids are just people jumping up the bid, which happens virtually everywhere- even at the low end sales- that is something that takes away from the transparency of the process.

But, it is part of the game, and it isn’t going away. So, bid to where you want to, and then, walk away.[/QUOTE]

I don’t think it is possible to prevent shill bidding. It happens all the time on places like ebay. It is too hard to police 100% of it out of the system.

A college professor of mine was very involved in racing and would talk about how certain high profile people were paid to bid on a horse just to drive the price up. The idea was to make people think “oh, so and so is bidding on this horse, this must be a good one” and then at some point the fake bidder would drop out, having forced the bids up higher than the horse would have gone for otherwise

While I’m sure there are safeguards in place, I doubt it can be policed out of the racing scene.

That kind of thing (shills, etc.) is why I would never buy at auction.

[QUOTE=SnicklefritzG;8179201]
I don’t think it is possible to prevent shill bidding. It happens all the time on places like ebay. It is too hard to police 100% of it out of the system.

A college professor of mine was very involved in racing and would talk about how certain high profile people were paid to bid on a horse just to drive the price up. The idea was to make people think “oh, so and so is bidding on this horse, this must be a good one” and then at some point the fake bidder would drop out, having forced the bids up higher than the horse would have gone for otherwise

While I’m sure there are safeguards in place, I doubt it can be policed out of the racing scene.[/QUOTE]

I will rehash what LaurieB said in her last post. NO ONE is forced to pay for a horse any more than they planned to pay when the horse walked into the ring. There is no need to “police” the bidding and or sales process. If someone walks into the sales pavilion with a pot full of money and doesn’t know how the “game” is played. Whose fault is that? The “rules” are fully are available to anyone who takes the time to read them. It’s not like they are only available to “insiders”.

It’s no different than sitting down for a game of poker. If you don’t know how the game is played you are going to get fleeced. “Bluffing” is a big part of the game. I can play poker well enough with local my poker buddies. But no way in the world would I sit down with “seasoned” players. I’d lose my shirt.
As LauireB said, she has a set price at which she values a horse and if the reserve is more than what she is willing to give then the horse will sell to someone else. If the seller values the horse more than everyone else bidding the horse doesn’t sell. If the under bidder/s are still interested in the horse they can go to the seller and try and negotiate a price.

People who understand the “game” also understand that the Sales Company works for the seller. It is their job to get as much for the horse in the ring as possible. It benefits the seller their client and it benefits the sales company. Because at the end of the day they receive 5% of the sales. Which by the way is a bargain compared to non-horse auctions. Where they collect 10% from the seller and 10% from the buyer.

The auctioneers are the best in the business. They know how to “read” the “crowd” the bidders. A lot of the times seasoned buyer can tell when a horse is “on the market”, the horse has passed the reserve. But just because it has they do not “hammer” the horse, sell the horse to the first bid above the reserve. The bidding continue until there is a “last man standing”. But there are times when the auctioneers feels/knows there is more money in the “room” than is being bid. So at their digression they may “run” the bid up hoping to get more money out of an enthusiastic bidder. A seasoned bidder can usually but not always tell when this is happening. So they “call” the auctioneers “bluff” and “back up” the bid. As I explained in an earlier comment. So sometimes but not always an unseasoned buyer will ended up paying more for the horse than they had to.

However if the auctioneers “misjudge” the bidder and “run the horse out of bidders” and get caught with their paints down. The auction company is on the hook to pay for the horse.

"A college professor of mine was very involved in racing and would talk about how certain high profile people were paid to bid on a horse just to drive the price up. The idea was to make people think “oh, so and so is bidding on this horse”

This is one of those “urban legends, auction myths”. At least in the big leagues when playing with pros. None of us give a rat’s butt what someone else is doing, bidding by and large. That’s a sucker’s play. The majority of people who “play” in the big leagues are a very good judge of a horse. It’s not as much about picking out a top prospect as it is have a budget to pay for it. I have lost out on some VERRY good horses because my client didn’t have the budget to outbid others. I was the agent who selected Point Given and was very fortunate to have a client with deep pockets. Most of the time I didn’t.

I lost out buying Afleet Alex for my own account and partners by $5,000. Sometimes you win sometimes you loose

A lot of “known” wealthy buyers like to use an agent instead of making their interest known to the sellers and auctioneers. So the price of the horse is not inflated. A lot times when an agent has made a high profile purchase and is interviewed more times than not they will decline at their clients request to “name” who they bought the horse for.

[QUOTE=SportArab;8179289]
That kind of thing (shills, etc.) is why I would never buy at auction.[/QUOTE]

I and anyone IN the business, buyer or seller would take total exception to calling the auction process a “shill”. Total BS.

I am glad this came to a close quickly and before the “race” Less fodder for negative press for both the horse and the Zayat’s.

http://www.paulickreport.com/news/the-biz/judge-cites-statute-of-limitations-in-dismissing-gambling-debt-lawsuit-against-zayat/

He avoided paying a gambling debt. That’s great !

[QUOTE=gumtree;8179335]

"A college professor of mine was very involved in racing and would talk about how certain high profile people were paid to bid on a horse just to drive the price up. The idea was to make people think “oh, so and so is bidding on this horse”

This is one of those “urban legends, auction myths”. At least in the big leagues when playing with pros. [/QUOTE]

you’ve got a lot of knowledge Gumtree, but to imply that there aren’t dishonest business practices going on in racing is ridiculous. If you want to PM me, I’ll tell you exactly who the players were that my professor referred to. They absolutely were BIG league players and very big names.

Just because some of us don’t make a living off of racing doesn’t mean that we have no idea of the types of things that can happen behind the scenes.

[QUOTE=SnicklefritzG;8179493]
you’ve got a lot of knowledge Gumtree, but to imply that there aren’t dishonest business practices going on in racing is ridiculous. If you want to PM me, I’ll tell you exactly who the players were that my professor referred to. They absolutely were BIG league players and very big names.

Just because some of us don’t make a living off of racing doesn’t mean that we have no idea of the types of things that can happen behind the scenes.[/QUOTE]

Horse trading in general doesn’t have the best of reputations and I know stories of shenanigans that have happened at sales. But I have also bought and sold horses in multiple TB sales in different states using different sales companies. I’ve set those reserves and I am pretty offended by the thought that if I live bid over the reserve that I am “shill bidding”.

Auctions are not private sales. There is an ebb and a flow to them depending not only on the broader market which may draw people to the sale but what is also sitting at any given time in the pavilion. To get a decent price, you really need two live bidders because savvy people tend to sense where the reserve is. Bidding a single buyer up can be a dangerous game if it fails because not only does the horse not sell but the owner then has to pay the commission to the sales company as though the horse did sell for an illusory sales price which when combined with sales prep, day rate, commissions to the agent and transportation, makes for a very expensive day for the seller. Sellers may do it for a different reason, ie to plump up a stallions’ sales averages but that stuff is easy to sniff out.

If you do your homework, TB auctions are probably as transparent as any horse related transaction. Horses have to be on the grounds for at least a day or two before the sale. They’ve been vetted, they’ve been walked, they’ve been scoped, XRays are generally in the depository. A savvy buyer gets an Auction Edge supplement and has access to encyclopedic information about the family – who owns what and how they sold and what that black type really means. There are short term warranties in place.

But the buyer still has to understand that there are no guarantees --either way–which is why champions can sometimes sell for the proverbial ham sandwich while others selling for more than the average house in the Hamptons can’t win. It’s really up to the buyer to decide on the horse, know why they want the horse and what they will pay and not worry about who they are bidding against because at the end of the day that is not relevant if you know what you are doing.

[QUOTE=gumtree;8179339]
I and anyone IN the business, buyer or seller would take total exception to calling the auction process a “shill”. Total BS.[/QUOTE]

The word “shill” refers to the person who is bidding up the item and has no interest in buying it, just in driving up the price for the seller. Shills have been around since the first auction, I suspect. But buyers don’t like them. And some auctions declare that they will make sure that there are no shills. Certainly on ebay, if you’re caught colluding with a shill, there are consequences.

[QUOTE=gumtree;8179341]
I am glad this came to a close quickly and before the “race” Less fodder for negative press for both the horse and the Zayat’s.

http://www.paulickreport.com/news/the-biz/judge-cites-statute-of-limitations-in-dismissing-gambling-debt-lawsuit-against-zayat/[/QUOTE]

I agree. Also feel the whole thing smacks of a shake down: that is, you give me money or I will embarrass you in public.

[QUOTE=SnicklefritzG;8179493]you’ve got a lot of knowledge Gumtree, but to imply that there aren’t dishonest business practices going on in racing is ridiculous. If you want to PM me, I’ll tell you exactly who the players were that my professor referred to. They absolutely were BIG league players and very big names.

Just because some of us don’t make a living off of racing doesn’t mean that we have no idea of the types of things that can happen behind the scenes.[/QUOTE]

I don’t want to speak for gumtree, but I believe he was not talking about any or all dishonest practices but rather taking issue with the assertion above.

I have to agree with his “urban myth” designation for the simple reason that the idea doesn’t make sense. Any buyer that plays at the level of the “high profile” guys has his own expert advisors. Believe me, they’re not hanging around the sales pavillion waiting to see what Wayne Lukas wants. They’re out back at the barns finding their own prospects. There’s a reason that the high dollar horses bring the big money and it’s because they’re the standouts in their books and everyone lands on them.

The notion that someone in the pavillion might see Baffert (eg) bidding two hundred, three hundred, five hundred thousand dollars on a horse and say to himself, “I haven’t seen the horse, I haven’t vetted it, I haven’t checked out its family, but if Baffert wants it, let’s just throw money at it” is kind of ludicrous.

I know the figures that get thrown around at TB sales begin to feel like Monopoly money after a while but to the people who are spending those amounts, that’s real cash. So they’re a good deal more careful than that about where it goes.

As an aside: the real work of the TB sales goes on back at the barns, not up in the sales pavillion. In the early books of Keeneland September, for example, every horse that comes onto the grounds gets a thorough look by dozens, if not hundreds of people. The big buyers and agents have advance teams who look at every single horse in the sale and make short lists. On the first day a horse is showing, as soon as they barns open at 8 a.m., it’s one “all show” after another. On the second day (if you’re lucky and the short-listers liked your horse) the agents and trainers will show up. And if you get a third look and/or a scope you know you’re doing well. We’ve had horses who’ve been looked at more than 150 times before they go through the sales ring.

So people are out there doing their jobs (and generally hoping to find a diamond in the rough that someone else might have overlooked). They’re not just sitting around waiting to see which horse some high profile guy might like.

You guys are still talking as if nothing dishonest is going on behind the scenes. I doubt there is any industry anywhere that is 100% honest.

I take issue with the fact that I expressed an opinion based on discussions I’ve had with people involved with racing and he felt the need to call it “urban legend”. That’s rude.

Racing isn’t 100% clean and I doubt anything else is.

No one has said it’s squeaky clean… just that the general auction process at Fasig or Keeneland is nothing shady. Bidding up one’s own horse is allowed and not considered unethical. The auction company acting as a commercial business and squeezing every last dollar out of a horse is not unethical. It’s how things work.

Similarly, there are “paper sales” which really aren’t. Like Zayat, through David Ingordo, buying back American Pharoah at Saratoga. You could say it was 100% honest that he didn’t want to sell the horse…but insiders will recognize the six-figure sale helps prop up his sire Pioneerof the Nile. Skimming through the results of a sale, you may see a lot of big numbers and get impressed that it was a “good sale.” But ask someone in the know, and they’ll tell you whether it was “real money” or not. The multiple six-figure Tapits are probably legit sales. The first-crop sire getting a bunch of hot attention, purchased by several anonymous “____, Agent?” Maybe legitimate, or maybe just an effort to boost the stallion stats.

Keeneland and Fasig don’t care… they make commission regardless.

Dirty deals are things like agent-to-agent behind the scenes fleecing the clients (kickbacks to themselves). Double-dipping. Those are illegal practices. Happens in other horse sales too. Honestly, I feel MUCH MUCH safer shopping at a TB auction than trying to buy a nice horse in the h/j world. In the TB buying business, the owner can choose to be as involved as he/she wants, preferably with the help of a trusted agent. The TB you’re buying will be guaranteed in its identity. Buying a high-dollar hunter, it’s trainer-to-trainer deal only, “your people talk to my people,” and likely the horse’s passport was tossed as soon as it stepped onto US soil. A few sales later, it may have lost a year in age and been through four name changes. Who is there to protect the buyer?

Different worlds have different ways of doing things. Just because it seems foreign doesn’t mean it’s unethical.

I read all the posts in this thread, and with all of the talk of integrity (or lack thereof), does anyone else find it somewhat ironic that the initial post links to the webpage “ahmedzayat.com” with a title “Ahmed Zayat, Owner of American Pharoah” and “About Ahmed Zayat”, while the website is essentially impersonating Ahmed Zayat and misleading users about site content, then posting every possible dirty laundry innuendo from the past 20 years.

Doesn’t say a lot for the integrity or credibility of the website creator.

“If you do your homework, TB auctions are probably as transparent as any horse related transaction. Horses have to be on the grounds for at least a day or two before the sale. They’ve been vetted, they’ve been walked, they’ve been scoped, XRays are generally in the depository. A savvy buyer gets an Auction Edge supplement and has access to encyclopedic information about the family – who owns what and how they sold and what that black type really means. There are short term warranties in place.”
Ditto this!

[QUOTE=wanderlust;8179897]
I read all the posts in this thread, and with all of the talk of integrity (or lack thereof), does anyone else find it somewhat ironic that the initial post links to the webpage “ahmedzayat.com” with a title “Ahmed Zayat, Owner of American Pharoah” and “About Ahmed Zayat”, while the website is essentially impersonating Ahmed Zayat and misleading users about site content, then posting every possible dirty laundry innuendo from the past 20 years.

Doesn’t say a lot for the integrity or credibility of the website creator.[/QUOTE]

No kidding. And the latest opus by Joe Drape was just more of the same.

[QUOTE=SnicklefritzG;8179493]
you’ve got a lot of knowledge Gumtree, but to imply that there aren’t dishonest business practices going on in racing is ridiculous. If you want to PM me, I’ll tell you exactly who the players were that my professor referred to. They absolutely were BIG league players and very big names.

Just because some of us don’t make a living off of racing doesn’t mean that we have no idea of the types of things that can happen behind the scenes.[/QUOTE]

My comment was nothing personal. There’s no “professor” on earth unless he/she retired from the “game” that can speak with authority. If you professor did, PM me the name. I know pretty much all of the major players of the last 40 years. I know most of the BS that has been pulled and or tried.

I don’t think I ever eluded to the everything being on the up and up. I gave a short scenario in one of my comments.

I have been “taken” by couple of the biggest “names” in the game. Names that a lot of people in this forum think are beyond reproach. In the industry in general. Total BS. Maybe I’ll leave the “rest of the story” in my will.

I don’t know for fact but I doubt little if any money changed hands in the “$16 mil Green Monkey” deal. I have a feeling it falls under “pay back is a b***h”.