Kevin Keane’s Sportsfields Candy (a delicious horse) was gorgeous, what a quality animal 

Wow!!!
His score was as good as his test, and in the four-star there are several (4? Would have to check the leaderboard) under 30.
Poor Erin Kanara having to follow him on a horse with almost identical markings, but not in any way comparable in the movement department - and unfortunately tense.
Re: scoring: I was thinking about this last night, and it seems to me that in the past judges were more generous with positive scoring, resulting in more scores in the 20s.
Obviously the mistakes are going to hurt, especially if they have a double coefficient!, but they are just a couple of scores out of the entire test - if the rest of it was consistently good (like Colleen’s), one or two low scores should not result in a 70/30. So where are the “8s” for the really exceptional work?
I wonder about the double coefficient harmony mark; do one or two mistakes really affect it by a full number score - or more? Just my random musings.