ACTHA bans treeless saddles

[QUOTE=Kyzteke;5641330]
Again – $2000 is not considered an expensive treed saddle (I can only speak for English – I haven’t ridden western in decades).

I can’t speak for or against either one, as I’ve never ridden in a treeless. Actually sounds like a cool idea and I’ve looked at some at tack stores & booths at some of the bigger endurance rides.

The part I find assuming is that this organization who banned them – don’t their rides only go 10 miles or under? Or am I wrong? Not familiar with them or their competitions at all.

For that little distance you could ride in almost anything and the horse would be ok…[/QUOTE]

Western saddles can run up into the stratosphere on cost. I’ve seen them well over $5000. What’s cheap to you may not be cheap to me. For me a $2000 saddle is expensive. Treeless saddles can run the gamut just like treed saddles, from the ebay trash at a couple hundred to upwards of $3000. The bottom line is don’t buy cheap and whatever you get it has to fit.

Just as an aside, the ACTHA folks don’t allow martigales and we all know what death traps they are…I think it’s more about what thye are comfortable with and not really about embracing different disciplines.

raises her hand

I am a heavy weight rider (230#'s, thank you), and I ride treeless. On a 14.3 hand horse even. He does not have a sore back, nor does he show any signs of his Freeform hurting him during long rides. I ride him with a double elastic girth, adjusted the same as I would for a treed saddle. I don’t NORMALLY mount from the ground because i have horrid knees, but I have, and as long as I’m not dawdling, I don’t have a problem with the saddle slipping.

I use a Haf pad under the saddle, and always ride with a breast collar just in case the saddle slips (it never has). My horse is trained to go with a crupper too, but we very rarely use it.

My boy has never worn a treed saddle, so I don’t know if how he would act with it. But I know me, the horse, my vet, and my chiropractor all agree, his treeless saddle isn’t causing him any problems. As long as he’s happy and pain free, we keep using that saddle.

Good thing I wasn’t planning on riding any ACTHA rides anyway.

Wow. I don’t know what to think about ACTHA now. I agree with them about treeless saddles - but I hate they backed down from their position.

Well, my niece is marrying a fellow whose mama is big into ACTHA. This’ll give us something to talk about at the rehearsal dinner!:yes:

Sounds like after listening to treeless supporters, that although her personal opinion didn’t change, she respected the personal choice of others to ride treeless and in an effort not to exclude people for their personal choices (just like the rope halters) they rescinded the rule. It ultimately was about personal choice in tack, which she obviously respects the rights of individuals to ride in what they see fit; don’t think it was a “money” decision, just a decision not to enforce her personal opinions on members. Kudos to Carrie for having an open mind to listen to different mindsets. I ride in an ortho flex and a Tucker, have done endurance and competitive for 20+ years. Seen some very successful treeless saddle competitiors, but am not one. Believe no one knows your horse like you - you’re responsible for the well being of your own mount!

If they ban treeless saddles I guess they’ll be no ACTHA rides in my future. I went thru 9 treed saddles before I tried a treeless saddle on my mare, my only regret is I didn’t try that route sooner. She has become a whole different mare, from being hot & nervous with her head in the air to relaxed, low headset & swinging walk, it was truly an amazing experience. I even paid Michael Stokes to make a saddle ($2500 many years ago) to fit my mare, but it never worked out, it kept causing pressure points and white hairs on her withers & it kept tipping me forward in the saddle. After much heartache & research I bought a BMSS & haven’t looked back. It’s been the best thing I’ve done for my mare. I am not against treed saddles one bit, everyone is entitled to use what works for their horses & themselves but for an organization to begin banning tack such as a treeless saddle seems useless to me. Maybe ACTHA isn’t worried about attracting new members like ECTRA & AERC but to start nit picking peoples choice of tack is a good way to deter folks from joining your club in my opinion.

The bottom line is that most folks who have moved to treeless saddles have done so for the good of their horse, not to join a fad or jump on a band wagon and certainly not because they are cheaper (the quality ones are not, necessarily). I would say that as a group we treeless saddle riders have a much, much higher percentage of folks that are hyper-aware of saddle fit issues because we have seen first hand the damage a poorly fitting treed saddle can do. Many of us regularly check for back soreness and look for obvious signs of abnormal pressure after every ride. Your average rider doesn’t usually give saddle fit a second thought. How many of you know people who use the same saddle on every horse they own? I’m guilty of it, before my horse started having issues with his saddle I used that same saddle on all my horses, and on my friend’s horses if I rode them. Looking back now with the clarity of hindsight I can see where there were several times that the saddle probably bothered the horse I had it on but it was explained away as a behavioral issue. At every big trail ride I attend I can spot dozens of uncomfortable looking horses now that I’m more aware of what to look for. It’s sad, really, that there are folks out there so narrow minded that they can’t see the value in something different from what they’ve always used. Many of them can only point to flawed studies and outdated information, or this: http://www.saddlefitting.net/equiscan/index.html .
There is one treeless saddle in this group of scans described as a “sports saddle”. Doesn’t say anything else. All the other scans are treed saddles and the overwhelming majority of them are causing severe pressure points. It should be pointed out that the Sharon Saare saddle had the most perfect scan and, oh yeah, coincidentally they sell Saare saddles on that website. I would like to see an INDEPENDENT study assisted by experts in fitting treeless saddles. On second thought, I don’t need to see a study. I’ll do my own in my barn and trails laboratory :-). Now that my horse and I are so comfortable in our treeless saddle I can honestly say: “Happy Trails!”

I’ve ridden in several brands of treeless saddles and they have just as much structure as treed saddles these days-spinal clearance, stability, weight distribution.
One could argue that treed saddles should be banned- we all agree that saddle fit is highly important, but it’s impossible for one treed saddle to fit a horse well all the time. Unlike a treeless saddle they have no give. So if your horse is well-fitted three weeks ago, if his muscling changes at all (which is very likely) it doesn’t fit anymore. Do you buy a dozen treed saddles and check each day which one fits for this day? of course not. Most people don’t even get their treed saddles restuffed every couple of months which is kind of essential for good fit because while the saddle may have fit when purchased the wool packs down.
One high-quality treeless saddle can adapt from day to day and fit well every day.

There is actually a saddle fitting clinic at the Palmyra CTC the weekend of June 10th. Double Diamond Equine, one of the top equine saddle fitters will be there doing the saddle mapping and talking about debunking saddle fitting myths. She supports all saddle types - fit and comfort of the horse is paramount. www.doublediamondequine.com . I think that we as horsepeople, in general are becoming more aware of the direct correlation between better communication, comfort of the horse and a better performance. We’ve evolved a long way from a “one size fits all” approach. As we are all individuals, so are our horses. Kudos to those who seek to improve the comfort of their partners!

Tom

Not really…our decision, even though the FEI bans them, we don’t believe we should be a policing authority. We are about fun and horses. Therefore whatever our members feel, within reason, they want to ride in is fine with us.
Tom
Actha GM

[QUOTE=tomscrima;5650666]
Not really…our decision, even though the FEI bans them, we don’t believe we should be a policing authority. We are about fun and horses. Therefore whatever our members feel, within reason, they want to ride in is fine with us.
Tom
Actha GM[/QUOTE]

FEI doesn’t ban treeless saddles! Include a link to where that is stated in their rules please.

Don’t know where you got that idea–FEI has no rules that prohibit treeless saddles.

Treeless or treed - I compete in both, and which type used to ride 50 > 100 milers depends entirely on which horse being - who was fitted with with type. Each of our high end horses has gasp their own specific fitted saddle - some treed, some not. All depends on the horse. It’s that simple.

I can’t remember the last time any of them had a back issue during vetting, pre/during/post race, so obviously atm, we are in the luck and all our horses have correctly fitting saddles.

they don’t need to be more heavily girthed, half the time my girth is loose. But thenI ride by balance (due to many years of riding bareback as a kid) I don’t require a ‘platform’ to cling to when racing. shrug

as for being a fas… eh, I’m not a fad person , I’m a 'what works best for each specific horse ’ person.
Take bitless for example. fad? Maybe.
I have horses who race in bits, some who don’t. I prefer to have horses racing in hackamores, simply because its easier for them to eat and drink on the a trail (imo) however… I also have a few horses who race in snaffles, cuz they are just turds in a hackamore. Not what I consider ‘fad’.

I also have shod and barefoot endurance horses - again - whatever works.
I have one gelding (100 milers) , who races in a snaffle, a treeless and is shod with pads all round so… go figure.

another mare, she races in a treed CC english saddle, hackamore, barefoot (50 miler)
both examples work. so… eh. I’m not changing it just to be or no be a ‘fad’ person

I ride in a BMSS because I love the way I can feel my horse underneath me. I also enjoy the fact that my seatbones don’t take a beating after being in it for more than an hour.

I didn’t buy it to join a fad or follow a trend. I tried a friend’s and liked it. I looked into various options and chose the BMSS with the thought that if it doesn’t work out, I can always resell it and not lose a ton of money.

I also still occasionally ride in a cheaper old beat up Collegiate dressage saddle or a cordura Big Horn. My older mare gets ridden in the BMSS or the dressage saddle. She used to get ridden in a cheapo Aussie, but it doesn’t seem to fit as well any more. So I obviously am not on the treeless bandwagon. I use what hopefully works. And the treeless so far has been our most expensive saddle, so I didn’t get it to save money.

I also have never had an issue with my BMSS as far as mounting or having it roll. I can see where it could be a problem on some horses with some people. But I also have to be fairly quick getting into my dressage saddle from the ground. And I tighten the treeless less than the dressage saddle, and the same as a treed Western.

I presently ride in a treeless. My choice for the horse I was riding. They (she was leased) went thru 8 saddles before I got my older model Torsion. It worked much better for her. Less bucking an bitting of my feet! She was no longer a “problem” mare!

I have a bad feeling it is not going to fit my new hores and I am shopping again.

That said, I don’t care if you prefer to ride in a treed. I just hope it is well fitted for that horse.

There was an interresting “study” posted, that I found very fascinating. http://das-sattelhaus.de/Druckmessung.html . Interresting because it is in German and I have no idea what it is saying! But they have linked video and pressure plates for 4 saddles; 3 treeless and one treed western. If you look closely, the Startrekk have really good reading at all 3 gaits. Barefoot, not so much (I think the rider was applying cues as it looked like outside seatbone when the horse turned). The treed western (not really a fair one to use, IMO) was the worst. It showed LOTS of pinching on the shoulders.

It showed me a few things. I definitely like Startrekk over Barefoots (but it just confirmed an opinion I already had about quality). Treeless are pretty good, if set up right. I KNEW IT!!!

The “conventional treeless” showed just how bad it can be! I find it to be the other was than what kyeteke stated: Unknowlegable horse people tend to get western treed saddles! (obviously not all, since there are many great western horsemen out there!) But how many times have you heard, toss the western on, it fits ALL horses?! I worked at a few riding stables. New horse came in, needs a saddle- put Rex’s on, we sold him last week! Doesn’t fit? Toss a second pad on! That’ll fix 'er! GAH! In this impression it is both pinching and bridging. And you can clearly see when the horse moves it’s shoulders and bends. Course, I wish I knew if this saddle was fitted to that horse! Bet it wasn’t. But to me it shows a more common theory to saddle fitting that I have come across. Westerns fit all! NOT!

Do I think this is unbiased… NO. Even without understanding the language, just by the saddles they picked I could see it wasn’t. But it did show that those treeless are not harming the horses.

Anyone speak German and can correct me?

I think, like anything else in horses, it is up to the individual rider to do what is better for their particular horse. You certainly know him better than me!

I won’t translate the whole page but just wanted to clarify: This was done by a business that sells a variety of saddles and they guarantee that your “system” (saddle with pad) is pressure-tested before you buy from them. So on this webpage they’re just showing you some examples of what they’ve done and how they set up the test. They’re not trying to make a point either way, or promote a certain brand or style, they’re just showing you can test your saddle/pad fit this way and find out if it works for your horse.

How uneducated to suggest that only beginners without any knowledge or skills gravitate towards treeless. Any one I know, which primarily encompasses endurance riders, are far from uneducated, rank newbies intent on following a “fad”.

I guess the shit ton of people riding treeless saddles successfully in endurance, up to and including FEI level-are clueless morons who have conspired with the vets to pass sore and damaged horses through all those vetting parameters? Much more of a test than a 5-6 mile ACTHA snooze.

I have two Freeforms. Beautifully made Italian leather saddles that ran me about $1700@. I do not consider that cheap. Very few people can afford $3000+ saddles and that in itself does not mean it will be a good fit. FWIW, I’ve owned many treed saddles, some of which I liked but most I did not. My last one was a custom Black Country Vinici which cost me $2800 several years ago and is over 3k now. Beautiful saddle, but didn’t work for me or my horse in endurance. What is important to me is the comfort of both my horse and myself and so I went through many demos finding a saddle which did.

I could give two craps what folks ride in whether it is bits, treed or non treed saddles, shoes or no shoes. Whatever works for that horse and rider is AOK with me. I’ve owned many treed saddles and would be willing to go that route again if one worked for my horse and me. At the present, it is a FF.

[QUOTE=pandorasboxx;5653792]

I guess the shit ton of people riding treeless saddles successfully in endurance, up to and including FEI level-are clueless morons who have conspired with the vets to pass sore and damaged horses through all those vetting parameters? [/QUOTE]

Is shit ton more or less than a metric ton? I like it. I’m gonna use that. Even though I have a shit ton of housework to do, I’m gonna go play with my horses…

Thanks Lieselotte, for the explanation! Wish there was a business near me with a system like this! My youngster was bought to do longer distances and I want to be sure we have the best system possible! I’d pay, to be sure my saddle money is well spent.

At the 2nd vet check at an endurance ride a few weeks ago, I counted 6 of 7 horses in the check wearing a Bob Marshall saddle, my horse included. A couple of these horses were entered in the 75, the others were 50s. My horse has gotten straight As on her back at every check she’s been through since I’ve been riding treeless.

Yes at one point I had major problems with a treeless rolling under the horse, but I sold that saddle, switched to Bob Marshall and never had one problem since. And just this summer I finally learned how to MOUNT FROM THE GROUND in my Bob Marshall on my 15 hand Arab. No problems. The saddle barely moves. I reach over to the right side and grasp the breast collar tug with my left hand instead of grabbing mane. I never thought I could mount a horse from the ground anymore (broken pelvis), treeless or not. But since learning that one small trick I have no problems.

I have ridden out every manner of spook and bolt you can imagine in my Bob Marshall and been far more secure than in any treed saddle I have ever ridden. I have gone off my horse 9 times since I broke her out as a youngster. Of those 9 times, 1 time was in my Bob Marshall and ONLY because I mounted from the side of a hill, over-launched myself and promptly flopped right off the opposite side. It made for a howling good laugh from everybody, but it had nothing to do with the saddle. Every other time I’ve been spooked and spun off was in an Abetta, an Aussie, or a little western trail pleasure saddle. And I can recall a few instances in the Bob Marshall when the horse spooked and spun and I stayed on top perfectly fine.

You do have to buy the expensive, nice pads with a treeless or you will probably have problems at some point. I use a Toklat Woolback with ultracell inserts, as well as an Equipedic with inserts. I am 5’7" and 150 and only one ride did my horse’s back get sore in my Bob Marshall. It was a 30 mile training ride over a lot of rock and hills, I let her roll in the sand at our rest stop and she got sand embedded down to her skin. I think the sand made her skin sore but also the inserts in the Toklat pad were too old and worn out. Totally my fault. No more sand rolling during a ride, and brand new inserts, and that was the only sore back experience my horse has had since we’ve been treeless.

But when I was riding treed, she developed white patches with various saddles, and was very sore under the bars. She was reluctant and stiff to go down hills. And while she’s never been a bucker, she would twist her head and pogo stick in protest. With the treeless she can step out in a big swinging walk down a steep hill, put her head and neck down, stretch out, and have no pain or reluctance.

Treeless is an awesome way to ride, if you have the right saddle and the right pad. An endurance style breastcollar also helps stabilize the saddle side-to-side.

I really cannot imagine trying to fit a horse into a treed saddle at this point in my life. Their fitness and muscle tone changes constantly throughout the season. You can buy a $5,000 custom built and fitted treed saddle, and 1 month later it won’t fit the horse anymore. Treeless saddles are just as changeable and flexible as the horse’s back (for the most part.) You still do have to do some fitting, but it’s nowhere near as touchy a process as treed.

I love my Bob Marshall so much I bought a 2nd one and my young Arabs coming on will be started in the Bob Marshall.

I would really love to see a current tack survey done through the AERC. I see so many Bob Marshalls at rides, and on the trails conditioning. They seem to be the most popular treeless of everything on the market.

The Barefoot London, Bandos, and Black Forest all were a total bust for me. I owned the Bandos and trialed the others. So it still took me a few saddles to find the one that works, but it was worth the journey.

Reading through some of these answers I thought of this quote. Glad that ACTHA could go back and change a rule. “He that never changes his opinions, never corrects his mistakes, and will never be wiser on the morrow than he is today.” ~ Tryon Edwards